What Do We Know about Opioids and the Kidney?

Evidence suggests a link between opioid use and kidney disease. This review summarizes the known renal manifestations of opioid use including its role in acute and chronic kidney injury. Both the direct and indirect effects of the drug, and the context which leads to the development of renal failure, are explored. While commonly used safely for pain control and anesthesia in those with kidney disease, the concerns with respect to side effects and toxicity of opioids are addressed. This is especially relevant with the worldwide increase in the use of opioids for medical and recreational use.

Randomized controlled trial of strain-specific probiotic formulation (Renadyl) in dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Primary goal of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of Renadyl in end-stage renal disease patients was to assess the safety and efficacy of Renadyl measured through improvement in quality of life or reduction in levels of known uremic toxins. Secondary goal was to investigate the effects on several biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress. METHODS: Two 2-month treatment periods separated by 2-month washout and crossover, with physical examinations, venous blood testing, and quality of life questionnaires completed at each visit. Data were analyzed with SAS V9.2. RESULTS: 22 subjects (79%) completed the study. Observed trends were as follows (none reaching statistical significance): decline in WBC count (-0.51 × 10(9)/L, P = 0.057) and reductions in levels of C-reactive protein (-8.61 mg/L, P = 0.071) and total indoxyl glucuronide (-0.11 mg%, P = 0.058). No statistically significant changes were observed in other uremic toxin levels or measures of QOL. CONCLUSIONS: Renadyl appeared to be safe to administer to ESRD patients on hemodialysis. Stability in QOL assessment is an encouraging result for a patient cohort in such advanced stage of kidney disease. Efficacy could not be confirmed definitively, primarily due to small sample size and low statistical power-further studies are warranted.

Chronic kidney disease in the elderly: evaluation and management.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a very common clinical problem in elderly patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. As life expectancy continues to improve worldwide, there is a rising prevalence of comorbidities and risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes predisposing to a high burden of CKD in this population. The body of knowledge on the approach to elderly patient with CKD is still evolving. Thus, this review seeks to explore the epidemiology and to discuss current understanding of challenges in the diagnosis and management of elderly patients CKD.

Peritoneal dialysis should not be the first choice for renal replacement therapy in the elderly.

Based on our review, it appears fair to infer that substantive differences in long-term outcome with PD compared with in-center HD have not been documented. PD may offer a slight advantage in younger, nondiabetic patients in the early phase of renal replacement therapy. Nevertheless, PD is not an advantageous option for that large cohort of the dialysis population in the United States comprised of elderly patients with diabetes.

A step toward solving the long-term care dilemma for living kidney donors.

Living kidney donor transplantation, universally recognized as the best current option in care for patients with end-stage renal disease, has shown a static growth in application in the United States despite continued expansion of the prevalent number of patients sustained by dialysis. Whether insurance providers' deficient payment to transplantation facilities for long-term costs generated by living kidney donors contributes to the problem was examined by the facility. Precise focus on all coding and billing for services rendered during care beyond 6 months effectively increased reimbursement from insurance providers for a living kidney donor from 47% to 85% of the amount billed. Although the sample of 82 donors was small and predominantly white (81.7%), it seems reasonable to suggest that centers with a low rate of payment consider an examination of their own billing and coding practices. The extent of donor resistance to participate in a continuing posttransplantation relationship with the transplantation center previously linked to financial issues borne by the donor remains unaddressed and could be explored in a subsequent study.

Obstructed or malpositioned urethral catheter induced acute kidney injury.

Unanticipated renal failure may be induced by an obstructed urethral catheter that was a component of complex management or difficult insertion. Two patients with new-onset uremia due to obstructed urethral catheters evinced rapid return of renal function when their blocked catheters were replaced.

Pilot study of probiotic dietary supplementation for promoting healthy kidney function in patients with chronic kidney disease.

INTRODUCTION: Uremic syndrome consists of nitrogenous waste retention, deficiency in kidney-derived hormones, and reduced acid excretion, and, if untreated, may progress to coma and eventual death. Previous experience suggests that oral administration of a probiotic formulation of selected microbial strains may extend renoprotection via intraintestinal extraction of toxic waste solutes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)stages 3 and 4. This report presents preliminary data from a pilot study. METHODS: This was a 6-month prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of a probiotic bacterial formulation conducted in four countries, at five institutions, on 46 outpatients with CKD stages 3 an nd 4: USA (n=10), Canada (n=113), Nigeria (n=115), and Argentina (n=8). Outcomes were compared using biochemical parameters:blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine, and uric acid. General well-being was assessed as a secondary parameter by a quality of life (QQOL) questionnaire on a subjective scale of 1-10. RESULTS: Oral ingestion of probiotics (90 billion colony forming units [CFUs]/day) was well tolerated and safe during the entire trial period at all sites. BUN levels decreased in 29 patients (63%, P<0.05), creatinine levels decreased in 20 patients (43%, no statistical significance), and uric acid levels decreased in 15 patients (33%, no statistical significance). Almost all subjects expressed a perceived substantial overall improvement in QOL (86%, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The main outcomes of this preliminary trial include a significant reduction of BUN, enhanced well-being, and absence of serious adverse effects, thus supporting the use of the chosen probiotic formulation for bowel-based toxic solute extraction. QOL and BUN levels showed statistically significant differences in outcome (P<0.05) between placebo and probiotic treatment periods at all four sites (46 patients). A major limitation of this trial is the small sample size nd elated inconsistencies.

Stressful ethical issues in uremia therapy.

The objectives of this review are to introduce and explore the following representative ethical problems generated by modern renal replacement therapy: (1) reviewing the historical origin of medical ethics with specific reference to nephrology; (2) recognizing the complex stresses surrounding assignment of a deceased donor renal transplant to a geriatric patient while young patients continue waiting for a donor kidney; and (3) appreciating the concept of futility and support for a uremic patient opting for death rather than further uremia therapy as the best in choice in coping with renal failure.

Continuously evolving management concepts for diabetic CKD and ESRD.

During the past 50 years, a global pandemic of kidney failure attributed to diabetes mellitus provoked continuously changing treatment strategies based in the belief that micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes may be preventable. Both patient and physician have revised, and sometimes reversed drug regimens based on inferences extracted from prospective, controlled, properly populated trials. Illustrating this dilemma is a newly relaxed target for glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7%, introduced because of the greater rate of cardiovascular complications noted when striving to reduce attained HbA1c to < or = 6.5%. Our concept of the natural history of kidney disease in diabetes has repeatedly been modified by a rising mean age of those developing uremia (now 64.5 years). Underscoring the reality that the majority of diabetic kidney failure patients fall within the geriatric age group. An encouraging finding first reported in 2005 and continuing through 2009 is a declining incidence rate of irreversible advanced kidney failure in individuals known to have diabetes. That this "good news" results from appropriate renoprotective treatment is as yet unsubstantiated wishful thinking.

New-onset diabetes after hemodialysis initiation: impact on survival.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of new-onset diabetes after initiation of hemodialysis (NODAD) and its impact on survival is not known. METHODS: We used data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) from January 2000 to December 2001, with at least 3 years of follow-up for this study. Patients aged 18-80 years were included. NODAD was defined as two Medicare institutional claims for diabetes in patients with no history of diabetes prior to starting hemodialysis (HD). Incidence (per 1,000 patient-years), prevalence (%) and hazard ratios for mortality in patients with NODAD were calculated. RESULTS: There were 59,340 incident patients with no history of diabetes prior to starting HD, of which 3,853 met criteria for NODAD. The overall incidence and prevalence of NODAD were 20 per 1,000 patient-years and 7.6%, respectively. In a cohort of 444 patients without diabetes and documented glycosylated hemoglobin A1c, <6% prior to starting HD (from January 2005 and March 2006), at a mean follow-up of 4.7 +/- 2.6 months, 6.8% developed NODAD defined by two Medicare claims for diabetes after initiation of HD. NODAD was associated with a significantly increased risk of death as compared to non-diabetes patients (hazard ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 1.14-1.25). CONCLUSION: The USRDS showed a high incidence of NODAD, associated with significantly higher mortality compared to those who did not develop NODAD. The mechanism of NODAD needs to be explored further in experimental and clinical studies.

Evolving pandemic diabetic nephropathy.

The expanding impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to pandemic diabetes mellitus is recounted emphasizing its epidemiology that has induced global socioeconomic stress on health care systems in industrialized nations now attempting to proffer optimal therapy for end stage renal disease (ESRD). Strategies to delay and perhaps prevent progression of diabetic nephropathy from minimal proteinuria through nephrotic range proteinuria and azotemia to ESRD appear to have decreased the rate of persons with diabetes who develop ESRD. For those with ESRD attributed to diabetes, kidney transplantation affords better survival and rehabilitation than either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. It is likely that advances in genetics and molecular biology will suggest early interventions that will preempt diabetic complications including renal failure.

Diabetic nephropathy in the elderly.

Although diabetes is clearly linked to macro- and microvasculopathy in multiple organs resulting in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular catastrophic diseases, blindness, and limb amputations, it is the relentless progression of diabetic nephropathy toward becoming the major cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) that now challenges budgets and treatment facilities providing hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation. Nephrology, as a specialty, is now dominated by the necessity to address geriatrics and endocrinology to cope with the tidal wave of elderly ESRD patients suffering from uremia caused by diabetes. On the brighter side, emergence of effective renoprotective regimens now slow the incidence rate of ESRD in those with diagnosed diabetes. There is bona fide reason to hope that within a decade, kidney failure attributable to diabetes will be transformed into a preventable complication of a disease that has dominated and directed our heritage.