Influence of Flavors and Nicotine Concentration on Nicotine Dependence in Adolescent and Young Adult E-Cigarette Users.

Objective: The objective of this study is to examine the relationships between e-cigarette flavors, nicotine concentration, and their interaction on measures of nicotine dependence.Methods: Survey data are drawn from a cross-sectional convenience sample of past 30-day e-cigarette users aged 15 to 24 years (N = 2037) collected between October 2020 and November 2020. Participants were asked to provide information about the e-cigarette products they used most regularly. Only those with available information on flavors (fruit, mint, menthol/ice, and tobacco), nicotine concentration (0-2.9%, 3-4.9%, and 5% or greater), and time to first vape after waking (within 30 minutes, greater than 30 minutes) were included in analyses (N = 1430). Generalized linear regression models were used with log link and binary distribution to assess the relationship between flavors, nicotine concentration, and nicotine dependence. Effect modification by nicotine concentration was assessed using an interaction term for flavors by nicotine concentration. Models were adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, gender, and financial situation.Findings: Fruit, mint, and menthol flavor user groups had a very similar dose-response relationship between nicotine concentration and prevalence of vaping within 30 minutes. These groups showed that the prevalence of vaping within 30 minutes gradually increased as nicotine concentration increased. Meanwhile, tobacco flavor user groups demonstrated a decrease in prevalence of vaping within 30 minutes, as nicotine concentration increased.Conclusion: Results highlight the need for understanding how e-cigarette product characteristics like flavors and nicotine concentration can facilitate nicotine dependence to e-cigarettes. Findings suggest that comprehensive e-cigarette product regulation of all flavors and reducing nicotine concentration will help to reduce the risk for nicotine dependence among young people.

A Randomized Trial of Nicotine versus No-nicotine E-cigarettes Among African American Smokers: Changes in Smoking and Tobacco Biomarkers.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this clinical trial was to compare the effects of e-cigarettes with and without nicotine on patterns of combustible cigarette use and biomarkers of exposure to tobacco toxicants among African American smokers. METHODS: African American smokers (n = 234) were enrolled in a 12-week, single blind, randomized controlled trial and assigned to ad lib use of nicotine e-cigarettes with or without menthol (2.4% nicotine [equivalent to combustible cigarettes], n = 118), or no-nicotine e-cigarettes (n = 116) for 6 weeks. Surveys were administered at baseline, 2, 6, and 12 weeks, and urinary biomarkers 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) and total nicotine equivalents (TNE) were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks. RESULTS: Participants smoked an average of 11.4 cigarettes per day (CPD) and 88% used menthol cigarettes at baseline. At Week 6, the nicotine group reported using e-cigarettes 9.1 times per day compared to 11.4 times in the no-nicotine group (p = 0.42). Combustible cigarette smoking decreased 3.0 CPD in the nicotine group compared to 2.7 CPD in the no-nicotine group (p = 0.74). Neither TNE nor NNAL changed significantly between baseline and Week 6. There were no differences in nicotine withdrawal symptoms between treatment groups. Smoking reduction persisted in both groups at Week 12. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our hypotheses, nicotine e-cigarettes did not significantly reduce the use of combustible cigarettes compared to no-nicotine e-cigarettes in this cohort of African American smokers. Findings suggest e-cigarettes are modestly associated with the decreased use of combustible cigarettes among non-treatment seeking smokers, regardless of nicotine content, but without a reduction in tobacco toxicants. IMPLICATIONS: Although e-cigarettes have the potential to reduce harm if substituted for combusted cigarettes (or if they promoted cessation) because of lower levels of tobacco toxicants, this study suggests ad lib use of e-cigarettes among African American smokers, with or without nicotine, results in modest smoking reduction but does not change toxicant exposure in a cohort where smoking cessation or reduction is not the goal. These data suggest that testing future harm reduction interventions using e-cigarettes should include more specific behavioral change coaching, including substituting for or completely stopping combusted cigarettes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT03084315.

Subjective response to intranasal nicotine administration in oral contraceptive users and naturally-cycling women.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately half of premenopausal women who smoke cigarettes also use hormonal contraceptives, with most using oral contraceptives (OCs). While research on the effects of endogenous hormones on smoking-related outcomes continues to expand, little is known about the influence of OCs on similar outcomes. We sought to explore differences in the subjective response to nicotine by OC use after stratifying by testing condition (e.g., smoking status). METHODS: Participants were regular (≥5 cigarettes/day) smokers, classified into OC and naturally cycling (NC) groups. All participants completed four total lab sessions by smoking status (ad libitum smoking, acute smoking abstinence) and anticipated progesterone level (low progesterone week (LPW), high progesterone week (HPW)). Each lab session included self-administration of intranasal nicotine (Time 0 min), assessment of subjective response via the Subjective State Scale (-30 and + 5 min). RESULTS: Compared to the NC group (n = 28), the OC group (n = 14) was younger (26.2 ±â€¯1.1 versus 24.2 ±â€¯1.1; p < 0.001) and had a lower Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence score (3.4 ±â€¯0.5 versus 2.6 ±â€¯0.5; p = 0.011). Progesterone-to-estradiol ratios varied significantly by group at three of the four time points (p < 0.05). During ad libitum smoking, the OC group had significantly lower craving after nicotine administration than the NC group (1.93 ±â€¯0.33 versus 2.89 ±â€¯0.23; p = 0.024). No other significant differences in subjective response were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significantly different hormone levels, group differences in subjective response to nicotine were relatively few. Additional research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms involved in these observations, as well as explore how they may influence cessation in women.

Teaching Community Health Needs Assessment to First Year Medical Students: Integrating with Longitudinal Clinical Experience in Rural Communities.

Community health education is especially important for physicians who will practice in rural communities. However, the majority of efforts to teach community and population health in medical school appear in later years and focus on non-rural contexts. This article presents data from a formative evaluation of a newly developed curricular component on population health and community health assessment for first year medical students in a rural longitudinal clinical preceptorship. Curricular elements included: a classroom lecture and review of online community health databases, an individual homework assignment and a classroom debriefing session. In a sample of 210 students, pre- and post-course surveys and exam questions assessed gains in awareness and skills over the course period. Analyses of data aggregated over four academic years (2013-2014 to 2016-2017) showed that first year medical students reported significant increases in familiarity with online resources (29.5% pre vs. 94.8% post, p < .001), understanding the importance of community health assessments (67.5% pre vs. 96.7%, p < .001), knowing how to plan a community health assessment (20.0% pre vs. 90.5%, p < .001), and awareness of Affordable Care Act expectations for community health assessments (12.4% pre vs. 82.4% post, p < .001). Further, students performed well on exam questions and reported that this component fit well with the objectives of the rural longitudinal clinical preceptorship course. Later-year education should reinforce early learnings and future studies involving long-term follow-up of physicians could assess the impact of early exposure to community health education on physician behaviors.