Analysis of responses of Long Beach, California residents to the Smoke-free Bars Law.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated survey responses to the Smoke-free Bars Law by residents of Long Beach, California (population 460,000), a city that reflects the state's diverse population. The research specifically aimed to determine: (1) residents' approval for the 1998 California Smoke-free Bars Law when it was implemented; and (2) changes in approval between baseline and 2-year follow-up. Data were also assessed for the demographic characteristics of the respondents and whether the respondents were self-acknowledged smokers or non-smokers. STUDY DESIGN: A random telephone survey was conducted in 1998 and 2000 in Long Beach to determine the degree of community support for the 1998 state law that prohibited smoking in all workplaces including alcohol-serving establishments. The numbers analysed were 784 in 1998 and 1237 in 2000. METHODS: Statistical analyses used in this research included univariate frequency distributions and logistic regression for 1998 and 2000. RESULTS: The major findings were as follows. Overall community approval for the 1998 state law increased from 65.2% in 1998 to 72.6% in 2000. Over this period, the rate of approval by smokers increased from 20.6% to 37.1%, and the rate of approval by non-smokers increased from 74.5% to 80.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The general public in a large city in California strongly approve of the prohibition of smoking in all indoor public places. This strong endorsement has major public health implications.

Public opinion analysis regarding the uses of master settlement agreement (MSA) funds.

OBJECTIVES: In the present research, we assessed the relationship between characteristics of the residents of Long Beach, California, a typical city in America, and their opinions regarding the uses of master settlement agreement (MSA) funds. METHODS: The statistical analyses used in the present research included univariate frequency distributions, cross-tabulations, and classification and regression trees. RESULTS: The results indicate that the majority of Long Beach residents share the opinion that the MSA funds should be allocated to health programmes. They do not, however, feel that these funds need to be earmarked solely for smoking prevention or cessation. CONCLUSIONS: Due to state budget deficits, legislators may strongly advocate for the MSA funds to be used for non-health purposes. Our findings provide support for community advocates who wish to bring the current uses of MSA funds and tobacco taxes to the forefront of national and international public debate.

Nosocomial infection and antibiotic utilization in geriatric patients: a pilot prospective surveillance program in skilled nursing facilities.

Prospective surveillance of nosocomial infection was conducted at seven skilled proprietary nursing facilities in Orange County, Calif., USA. The average incidence of facility-acquired infection was 5.2 infections/1,000 patient days. The most common source of infection was urinary tract (47%), followed by respiratory tract (26%) and skin (14%). The four most common pathogens isolated were Proteus spp. (20%), Escherichia coli (17%), Staphylococcus aureus (13%) and Pseudomonas spp. (11%). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (20%) was the most frequently used antibiotic among all prescriptions, followed by ampicillin (16%) and ciprofloxacin (14%). Among all residents surveyed, 33% received at least one course of antibiotics during the study. Of special significance was the fact that 4 (22%) of the 18 strains of Pseudomonas were gentamicin resistant as were 12 of 80 (15%) of the strains of Enterobacteriaceae. Furthermore, 9 of 29 (31%) strains of Pseudomonas tested were found resistant to norfloxacin as were 15 of 129 (12%) strains of enterobacteriaceae. Susceptibility patterns of the isolated pathogens were similar to those of the acute care hospital. This study indicates that infection continues to be a major problem in the skilled nursing facility and that antibiotic-resistant pathogens will be a challenge for the future.