Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
2.
Euro Surveill ; 18(26): 20512, 2013 Jun 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23827527

ABSTRACT

Nosocomial influenza is a large burden in hospitals. Despite recommendations from the World Health Organization to vaccinate healthcare workers against influenza, vaccine uptake remains low in most European countries. We performed a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial in order to assess the effects of implementing a multi-faceted influenza immunisation programme on vaccine coverage in hospital healthcare workers (HCWs) and on in-patient morbidity. We included hospital HCWs of three intervention and three control University Medical Centers (UMCs), and 3,367 patients. An implementation programme was offered to the intervention UMCs to assess the effects on both vaccine uptake among hospital staff and patient morbidity. In 2009/10, the coverage of seasonal, the first and second dose of pandemic influenza vaccine as well as seasonal vaccine in 2010/11 was higher in intervention UMCs than control UMCs (all p<0.05). At the internal medicine departments of the intervention group with higher vaccine coverage compared to the control group, nosocomial influenza and/or pneumonia was recorded in 3.9% and 9.7% of patients of intervention and control UMCs, respectively (p=0.015). Though potential bias could not be completely ruled out, an increase in vaccine coverage was associated with decreased patient in-hospital morbidity from influenza and/or pneumonia.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/transmission , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cluster Analysis , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Immunization Programs , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/immunology , Male , Netherlands/epidemiology
3.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 31(7): 1473-7, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22045049

ABSTRACT

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected physicians have been reported to infect some of their patients during exposure-prone procedures (EPPs). There is no European consensus on the policy for the prevention of this transmission. To help define an appropriate preventive policy, we determined the prevalence of HCV infection among EPP-performing medical personnel in the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The prevalence of HCV infection was studied among 729 EPP-performing health care workers. Serum samples, stored after post-hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination testing in the years 2000-2009, were tested for HCV antibodies. Repeat reactive samples were confirmed by immunoblot assay and the detection of HCV RNA. The average age of the 729 health care workers was 39 years (range 18-66), suggesting a considerable cumulative occupational exposure to the blood. Nevertheless, only one of the 729 workers (0.14%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: <0.01% to 0.85%) was tested and confirmed to be positive for anti-HCV and positive for HCV RNA, which is comparable to the prevalence of HCV among Amsterdam citizens. Against this background, for the protection of personnel and patients, careful follow-up after needlestick injuries may be sufficient. If a zero-risk approach is desirable and costs are less relevant, the recurrent screening of EPP-performing personnel for HCV is superior to the follow-up of reported occupational exposures.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Hepatitis C/transmission , Hepatitis C Antibodies/blood , Humans , Immunoblotting , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prevalence , RNA, Viral/blood , Risk Assessment , Young Adult
4.
Neth J Med ; 69(10): 465-8, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22058270

ABSTRACT

To implement adequate preventive measures in a hospital, the number and nature of occupational exposures to blood must be known. In the Amsterdam Academic Medical Centre a standardised procedure was used to assess all reported occupational exposures to blood from 2003 to 2010. 1601 incidents were reported of which 66% were needlestick accidents. Thirty-five percent of the incidents concerned persons in training and 27% concerned experienced nurses. Twenty-nine percent of accidents occurred during cleaning up after a medical procedure, including the recapping of needles in 6%. In 8% of the accidents the patient was known or found to be infected with hepatitis B or C virus or HIV and in 86% of accidents the personnel were immune to HBV. One case of HCV transmission occurred. The number and nature of the occupational exposures indicate that preventive measures must focus on the replacement of needles by safety devices and on awareness training of experienced nurses and of persons in training.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Needlestick Injuries/etiology , Netherlands/epidemiology , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data
5.
J Hosp Infect ; 77(4): 327-31, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21316803

ABSTRACT

A questionnaire study was performed in all eight University Medical Centers in The Netherlands to determine the predictors of influenza vaccination compliance in hospital-based healthcare workers (HCWs). Demographical, behavioural and organisational determinants were assessed based on behavioural and implementation models. Multivariable regression analysis was applied to assess the independent predictors for influenza vaccine uptake. Age >40 years, the presence of a chronic illness, awareness of personal risk and awareness of risk of infecting patients, trust in the effectiveness of the vaccine to reduce the risk of infecting patients, the HCWs' duty to do no harm and their duty to ensure continuity of care, finding vaccination useful despite the constant flow of visitors and having knowledge of the Health Council's advice, social influence and convenient time for vaccination were all independently associated with vaccine uptake. The accuracy of the prediction model was very high (area under the receiver operating curve: 0.95). Intervention programmes to increase influenza vaccine uptake among HCWs should target the relevant determinants identified in this study.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Health Personnel , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Female , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Netherlands , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 28(9): 1041-4, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19350292

ABSTRACT

In response to the confirmed transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) from a surgeon to several patients in the Netherlands, a 'Committee for Prevention of Iatrogenic Hepatitis B' was established in 2000. During the years 2000-2008, the committee reviewed 99 cases of HBV-infected health care workers. Fifty of them were found to perform exposure prone procedures (EPPs). Because of high levels of HBV DNA (>100,000 copies/ml), a ban on performing EPPs was applied in 11/50 cases; 25/50 low-viremic health care workers were allowed to continue EPPs while their HBV load was being monitored; and 14/50 cases had stopped working or changed profession. In five restricted workers who started oral antiviral treatment, HBV replication was persistently suppressed, enabling the ban on EPPs to be lifted. Throughout the European Union different levels of HBV viremia have been chosen, above which health care workers are not allowed to perform EPPs. It remains unknown how this affects the safety of patients. Application in the Netherlands of a European or a British guideline would have, respectively, doubled or tripled the number of restricted health care workers.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/blood , Health Personnel , Hepatitis B virus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hepatitis B virus/genetics , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Netherlands/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...