[Prevalence of ulcers in Dutch nursing homes]. / Het vóórkomen van ulcera in verpleeghuizen.

INTRODUCTION: Earlier cross-sectional research in the Netherlands has found that one out of three nursing home patients has a pressure ulcer. The prevalence of other ulcers is unknown. METHODS: In eight nursing homes 2295 patients were assessed with the Minimum Data Set (MDS). The mean age of the patients was 82.9 years (SD 7.4) and 70% was female. One third had severe cognitive impairment and only 17% had no or little ADL impairment. RESULTS: Prevalence of pressure ulcers was: stage 1: 3,6%; stage 2: 2,5%; stage 3: 1,2%; stage 4: 0,8%. Having a pressure ulcer was strongly correlated with ADL dependency: Odds Ratio (OR) 8,4 for moderate ADL-dependency, and OR 35,4 for severe ADL-dependency. Patients with pressure ulcers had more often pain (OR 2,7) and depressive symptoms (OR 2,1). Bowel incontinence was significantly correlated (OR 2,6) with pressure ulcers, just as the presence of an indwelling catheter (OR 3,2) and the use of diapers (OR 2,2), but urinary incontinence was not correlated with pressure ulcers. The prevalence of a venous ulcers was 2,6% and 1,7% had a venous ulcer higher than stage 1. The combination of foot ulcers and diabetes occurred in 1,2%, the combination of a peripheral vascular disease and ulcers in only 0,7%. The use of pressure reducing interventions increased with ADL dependency, nevertheless only 44% of the very dependent patients used these interventions.

[The calculation of quality indicators for Home Care agencies in 11 European countries]. / Berekenen van kwaliteitsindicatoren voor de thuiszorg: voorbeeld uit het ADHOC project, een vergelijking tussen thuiszorgorganisaties uit 11 Europese landen.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and calculate Home Care Quality Indicators from data of the European Aged in Home Care (ADHOC) project. With due regard for risk factors, home care agencies at country level have been compared with each other on quality of care. METHODS: The indicators of Home Care quality of care (HCQIs) are calculated based on methods that have been developed in the US and Canada. The values of these QIs are risk adjusted on the basis of odds ratios of covariates resulting from logistic regression analysis on the ADHOC sample. To enhance the comparison of QIs between countries we have used the method of percentile thresholds and QI aggregate sum measure related to those. RESULTS: Risk adjusted values of 22 Home Care Quality Indicators differed considerably between home care agencies in the eleven European countries that participated in ADHOC. The QI aggregate showed which countries probably had the best home care and which had the worst. CONCLUSIONS: There are quality indicators available, derived from data of the Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care, with which quality of care between home care agencies in and across nations can be adequately compared. Examples of this type of indicator are: social isolation, inadequate pain control, failure to improve in impaired locomotion in the home.

The MDS Challenging Behavior Profile for long-term care.

The objective was to construct a reliable and valid challenging behavior scale with items from the Minimum Data Set (MDS). Exploratory factor analyses of a sample of 656 nursing home residents yielded a 16-item Behavior Profile containing four internally consistent and valid subscales measuring conflict behavior, withdrawn behavior, agitation and attention seeking behavior (alpha range: 0.69-0.80). On a second dataset of 227 nursing home residents, internal consistency, inter-rater reliability and validity against the Behavior Rating Scale for Psychogeriatric Inpatients (GIP) were established. Internal consistency of the subscales ranged between 0.54 and 0.78. The overall inter-rater reliability of the items was 0.53 (kappa); of the scale it was 0.75 (ICC). The MDS Challenging Behavior Profile could potentially be an important contribution to existing clinical MDS-scales but additional studies on reliability, validity and usefulness are needed.

[The ZZP Questionnaire. Reliability of a new resource utilization measure]. / Betrouwbaarheid van de Zorgzwaartepakket (ZZP) scorelijst.

Data to determine the resource utilization of care recipients need to be reliable and the items that are measured need to be useful. In 2006, the Dutch Ministry of Health and Welfare has mandated all nursing homes and homes for the elderly to measure the Resource Utilization of all residents with the ZZP Questionnaire. Are the data resulting from this measurement reliable and is each of the 54 items of the ZZP Questionnaire useful? To answer this we tested the reliability of the data in a nursing home and a home for the elderly in two wards each. For 122 residents questionnaires were completed such that the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the answers could be assessed. Ten of the 54 items in the questionnaire showed insufficient inter rater reliability (<0.40) on the weighted Cohen kappa and another sixteen moderate (0.40 - 0.60). On the intra rater reliability test seven items had an insufficient kappa and another fifteen moderate. Besides, ten clusters of items could be formed with in-cluster Spearman correlation rates of .75 or higher. From the results of the reliability tests and the item intercorrelation rates we concluded that a substantial number of items needs to be improved and that in the ZZP Questionnaire 15 of the 54 items appear to be redundant on statistical grounds.

[Combined vision and hearing impairment: in an estimated 30,000-35,000 people aged 55 years or over in The Netherlands]. / Gecombineerde visus- en gehoorbeperking: naar schatting bij 30,000-35,000 55-plussers in Nederland.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the number of older people with acquired dual sensory impairment (DSI) in The Netherlands. DESIGN: Combination of studies in the general population and in relevant subpopulations. METHOD: Eight databases derived from recent studies on older persons with vision and hearing data on Dutch subjects aged 55 years or over were selected for further analysis. The measurement methods included self-reports, clinical measurements and observations. The prevalences of DSI were calculated for the general population, the non-institutionalised population, and subgroups such as older people in nursing homes and homes for the elderly. The calculated prevalences were extrapolated to the overall Dutch population. RESULTS: For the non-institutionalised population of 55 years and older, the prevalences of acquired DSI in two different data sets were 0.4% (95% CI: 0.2-0.6) and 0.6% (95% CI: 0.3-0.8), respectively. Among the inhabitants of homes for the elderly these percentages were 5.4% (95% CI: 0.9-9.9) and 5.5% (95% CI: 3.8-7.2), and in nursing homes they were 12.7% (95% CI: 9.7-15.7) and 16.7% (95% CI: 14.6-18.8). Acquired DSI was most common in persons 85 years of age and older. It was estimated that the number of people aged 55 years and over with acquired DSI in The Netherlands is 30,000 to 35,000. CONCLUSION: DSI is particularly a problem of the oldest old. An integrated approach to the visual and hearing problems of these subjects is essential.