Pulmonary Embolism After Endovascular Aortic Repair, a Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is associated with an increased risk of pulmonary embolism, which is often clinically silent and therefore difficult to recognise. The aim was to investigate the incidence of pulmonary embolism after EVAR using routinely performed pre- and post-operative aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA), and the association between pulmonary embolism and mortality. METHODS: This single centre retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent EVAR in the University Medical Centre Utrecht between January 2010 and July 2015 and who had a total aortic, thoracic aortic, or pulmonary CTA within one month post-operatively. Baseline and mortality data were obtained by reviewing hospital and general practitioner records. The primary outcome was pulmonary embolism within one month after surgery. Secondary outcomes were 30 day and six month mortality. RESULTS: During the study period, 526 EVARs were performed. Seventy-four of these procedures were included in the analysis of which there were 40 thoracic and 34 abdominal EVARs. In nine patients (12%, 95% CI 7-22) pulmonary embolism was observed of which one was central, two were segmental, and six were subsegmental. Seven were clinically silent and two were present on the pre-operative CTA. Thirty day mortality was significantly higher in patients with pulmonary embolism (relative risk 14.4, 95% CI 1.4-143, p = .037) though none of the deaths seemed directly attributable to it. CONCLUSIONS: This study, although preliminary, suggests that silent pulmonary embolism after EVAR occurs in approximately one in 10 patients, despite routine thrombo-embolism prophylaxis. Pulmonary embolism was associated with a higher 30 day mortality risk yet it was not the cause of death in any of these patients.

Barriers and Facilitators to eHealth Use in Daily Practice: Perspectives of Patients and Professionals in Dermatology.

BACKGROUND: The number of eHealth interventions in the management of chronic diseases such as atopic dermatitis (AD) is growing. Despite promising results, the implementation and use of these interventions is limited. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess opinions of the most important stakeholders influencing the implementation and use of eHealth services in daily dermatology practice. METHODS: The perspectives of health care professionals and patients towards the implementation and use of eHealth services in daily practice were assessed by using a mixed method design. A cross-sectional survey based on the eHealth implementation toolkit (eHit) was conducted to explore factors influencing the adoption of eHealth interventions offering the possibility of e-consultations, Web-based monitoring, and Web-based self-management training among dermatologists and dermatology nurses. The perspectives of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) regarding the use of eHealth services were discussed in an online focus group. RESULTS: Health care professionals (n=99) and patients (n=9) acknowledged the value of eHealth services and were willing to use these digital tools in daily dermatology practice. Key identified barriers (statements with <50% of the participants scoring totally agree or agree) in the implementation and adoption of eHealth interventions included concerns about the availability (12/99, 12%) and allocation (14/99, 14%) of resources, financial aspects (26/99, 26%), reliability, security, and confidentially of the intervention itself (29/99, 29%), and the lack of education and training (6/99, 6%). CONCLUSIONS: Health care professionals and patients acknowledge the benefits arising from the implementation and use of eHealth services in daily dermatology practice. However, some important barriers were identified that might be useful in addressing the implementation strategy in order to enhance the implementation success of eHealth interventions in dermatology.