Cost-utility analysis of the universal pneumococcal vaccination programme for older adults in Norway.

The aim of this study was to establish whether the universal pneumococcal vaccination for older adults in Norway is likely to be cost-effective from the perspective of the health care provider. A decision tree model developed by the Public Health Agency of Sweden was adapted to the Norwegian setting. Two cohorts, consisting of 65-year-olds and 75-year-olds grouped into vaccinated and unvaccinated, were followed over a 5-year time horizon. In the base case, the 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) was used while the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) was included in scenario analyses only. The costs and health benefits (measured in quality adjusted life years (QALY) gained) were compared in the two cohorts between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. The impact of indirect effects of the vaccine, such as herd immunity and serotype replacement, were not investigated. The relative importance of change in price was assessed by performing one-way sensitivity analyses. Under base-case assumptions, the programme for the 75-year-old cohort is expected to be dominant (cost-effective) from the health care perspective at the current maximal pharmacy retail price and at 75% vaccination coverage. In comparison, for the 65-year-old cohort the cost per QALY gained is approximately NOK 601,784 (EUR 61,281) under the base-case assumptions. A reduction in the cost of the vaccine to one quarter of its current level also brings the cost per QALY gained within the acceptable ranges in a Norwegian context for both the 65- and 75-year-old cohorts. There is no exact cost-effectiveness threshold in Norway. However, introducing a vaccination programme against pneumococcal disease for 65-year-olds in Norway is likely to fall within the acceptable range while for the 75-year-old cohort the universal programme appears to be dominant (cost-effective).

Pertussis epidemiology including direct and indirect effects of the childhood pertussis booster vaccinations, Norway, 1998-2019.

BACKGROUND: The acellular pertussis vaccine has been used in the Norwegian national immunisation program since 1998. Following an increase in pertussis incidence in all age groups, booster doses were introduced for 7-8-year-olds in 2006, and for 15-16-year-olds in 2013. We assessed the effects of the booster doses on pertussis incidence in different age groups to inform potential changes in vaccination policy. METHODS: We included all pertussis cases notified to the Norwegian Surveillance System for Communicable Diseases in 1998-2019. We calculated annual incidence rates (IR, per 100,000 inhabitants) by age group. We estimated average annual changes in IRs (incidence rate ratios, IRR) for each age group for 2006-2012 and 2013-2019 using Poisson regression. RESULTS: In 1998-2019, 74,675 cases of pertussis were notified. Coinciding with booster introduction, between 2006 and 2012 the IR decreased among 8-15-year-olds (from 433 to 199/100,000, IRR 0.89 [95% confidence interval 0.88-0.90]). A similar decrease was seen between 2013 and 2019 among 16-19-year-olds (from 171 to 77/100,000, IRR 0.84 [0.82-0.86]). There was no significant change in IRs among children < 1 year of age between 2006 and 2012 (IRR 0.99 [0.95-1.04]) or 2013-2019 (IRR 0.96 [0.91-1.02]). The IR decreased in both periods among adults aged 20-39 and 40+ (IRR 0.94 [0.93-0.95] and 0.92 [0.91-0.92] in 2006-2012; IRR 0.97 [0.96-0.99] and 0.97 [0.96-0.99] in 2013-2019, respectively). Despite steady, high vaccination coverage, in 2013-2019, there was an increase in the IR among children aged 1-7 (63 to 86/100,000, IRR 1.05 [1.03-1.07]) and 8-15 years (88 to 122/100,000, IRR 1.08 [1.06-1.10]). CONCLUSIONS: Pertussis booster doses have offered direct protection in the targeted age groups. Our findings suggest indirect protection in adults, while the incidence in infants hasn't changed. The recent increase in IRs among 1-15-year-olds warrants close monitoring and further evaluation of the vaccination schedule.