Morphine Use in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Downstream P2Y12 Receptor Blockers-Insight From Observational Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Morphine use for patients presenting with NSTE-ACS is associated with excess mortality. However, the role of morphine in STE-ACS is ill characterized. We have recently confirmed direct prothrombotic effect of morphine using murine models. We sought to explore whether morphine use in STE-ACS patients, used to be scheduled for downstream P2Y12 blockers, is negatively associated with procedural and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A single-center, observational retrospective analysis enrolling 130 non-randomized stable patients sustaining STE-ACS as their first manifestation of coronary disease, who presented between December 2010 and June 2013. All were managed by early invasive approach. Of study patients, 55 were treated by morphine, and 75 were not. All were administered downstream P2Y12 blockers according to an already abandoned local policy. Outcomes evaluated included TIMI grade flow, thrombus burden, ST-segment resolution, myocardial function by echocardiography, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Morphine administration was associated with a significantly higher incidence of impaired final TIMI grade flow (TIMI < 3, 40% vs 4%, P < .05), lower incidence of ST-segment resolution >70% (40.7% vs 76.5%, P < .05), and a higher incidence of moderate or severe systolic dysfunction (48.1% vs 29.1%, P < .05) compared with morphine naive patients. Interestingly, the overall mortality rate was higher in the morphine-treated group (18% vs 5.3%, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Morphine administration combined with the downstream P2Y12 blockers practice signify a group with a higher occurrence of impaired myocardial reperfusion and cardiovascular death despite established on-time primary angioplasty.

Differentiation between myopericarditis and acute myocardial infarction on presentation in the emergency department using the admission C-reactive protein to troponin ratio.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of myopericarditis is different than that of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, since their clinical presentation is frequently similar it may be difficult to distinguish between these entities despite a disparate underlying pathogenesis. Myopericarditis is primarily an inflammatory disease associated with high C-reactive protein (CRP) and relatively low elevated troponin concentrations, while AMI is characterized by the opposite. We hypothesized that evaluation of the CRP/troponin ratio on presentation to the emergency department could improve the differentiation between these two related clinical entities whose therapy is different. Such differentiation should facilitate triage to appropriate and expeditious therapy. METHODS: We evaluated the CRP/troponin ratio on presentation among patients consecutively included in a large single center registry that included 1898 consecutive patients comprising 1025 ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, 518 Non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients, and 355 patients diagnosed on discharge as myopericarditis. CRP and troponin were sampled on admission in all patients and their ratio was assessed against discharge diagnosis. ROC analysis of the CRP/troponin ratios evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of myopericarditis against all AMI, STEMI, and NSTEMI patients. RESULTS: Median admission CRP/troponin ratios were 84, 65, and 436 mg×ml/liter×ng in STEMI, NSTEMI and myopericarditis groups, respectively (p<0.001) demonstrating good differentiating capability. The Receiver-operator-curve of admission CRP/troponin ratio for diagnosis of myopericarditis against all AMI, STEMI, and NSTEMI patients yielded an area-under-the curve of 0.74, 0.73, and 0.765, respectively. CRP/troponin ratio>500 resulted in specificity exceeding 85%, and for a ratio>1000, specificity>92%. CONCLUSION: The CRP/troponin ratio can serve as an effective tool to differentiate between myopericarditis and AMI. In the appropriate clinical context, the CRP/troponin ratio may preclude further evaluation.

Direct Admission of Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction to the Catheterization Laboratory Shortens Pain-to-Balloon and Door-to-Balloon Time Intervals but Only the Pain-to-Balloon Interval Impacts Short- and Long-Term Mortality.

Background Shortening the pain-to-balloon (P2B) and door-to-balloon (D2B) intervals in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is essential in order to limit myocardial damage. We investigated whether direct admission of PPCI-treated patients with STEMI to the catheterization laboratory, bypassing the emergency department, expedites reperfusion and improves prognosis. Methods and Results Consecutive PPCI-treated patients with STEMI included in the ACSIS (Acute Coronary Syndrome in Israel Survey), a prospective nationwide multicenter registry, were divided into patients admitted directly or via the emergency department. The impact of the P2B and D2B intervals on mortality was compared between groups by logistic regression and propensity score matching. Of the 4839 PPCI-treated patients with STEMI, 1174 were admitted directly and 3665 via the emergency department. Respective median P2B and D2B were shorter among the directly admitted patients with STEMI (160 and 35 minutes) compared with those admitted via the emergency department (210 and 75 minutes, P<0.001). Decreased mortality was observed with direct admission at 1 and 2 years and at the end of follow-up (median 6.4 years, P<0.001). Survival advantage persisted after adjustment by logistic regression and propensity matching. P2B, but not D2B, impacted survival (P<0.001). Conclusions Direct admission of PPCI-treated patients with STEMI decreased mortality by shortening P2B and D2B intervals considerably. However, P2B, but not D2B, impacted mortality. It seems that the D2B interval has reached its limit of effect. Thus, all efforts should be extended to shorten P2B by educating the public to activate early the emergency medical services to bypass the emergency department and allow timely PPCI for the best outcome.

Modern Stents: Where Are We Going?

Coronary artery stenting is the treatment of choice for patients requiring coronary angioplasty. We describe the major advancements with this technology. There have been significant developments in the design of stents and adjunctive medical therapies. Newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have almost negligible restenosis rates and, when combined with proper anti-platelet treatment and optimal deployment, a low risk of stent thrombosis. The introduction of newer-generation DES with thinner stent struts, novel durable or biodegradable polymer coatings, and new antiproliferative agents has further improved the safety profile of early-generation DES. In parallel the effectiveness has been kept, with a significant reduction in the risk of target lesion revascularization compared with the early-generation DES. However, to date, the development of completely bioresorbable vascular scaffolds has failed to achieve further clinical benefits and has been associated with increased thrombosis. Newer-generation DES-including both durable polymer as well as biodegradable polymer-have become the standard of care in all patient and lesion subsets, with excellent long-term results.

Optimal Timing for Coronary Intervention in Patients With Transient ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

STEMI patients admitted urgently to the hospital but experience early complete resolution of both ischemic symptoms and ST-elevations on the electrocardiogram are diagnosed as transient STEMI (TSTEMI). Current evidence indicates that primary intervention is plausible but in certain circumstances intervention can be delayed. We sought to examine whether there is a time limit to such a delay that may affect long-term outcome. Study population included prospectively admitted TSTEMI patients whose demographics, pertinent medical history, and clinical and angiographic features were recorded. Study patients were divided by the median time interval from admission to intervention and their characteristics and long-term survival were compared. Study population comprised 260 consecutive patients (age: 57±10 years, men: 84%) diagnosed as TSTEMI who were included from January 2000 to June 2019, which represent 6% of all STEMI patients. Coronary angiography was performed in 254 patients. The median time interval from admission to angiography was 17 hours (IQR: 7.2 to 38.7 hours). Early (<17 hours from admission) and late (>17 hours from admission) study groups were comparable. One patient died during admission and 41 throughout the long follow-up period of 8.5 ± 5.2 years (median: 8.2 years, IQR: 3.4 to 13.1). Mortality of early-treated TSTEMI patients (11.2%) was significantly lower than of the late-treated patients (21.6%, p <0.04). The Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrated a clear tendency toward improved survival in early-treated TSTEMI patients (p <0.09). In conclusion, the present data suggest that TSTEMI patients should be treated, if not by primary coronary intervention, then at least within 17 hours from admission to achieve better long-term outcome.

[DIRECT ADMISSION OF STEMI PATIENTS TO THE CARDIAC CARE UNIT VERSUS ADMISSION VIA THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT FOR PRIMARY CORONARY INTERVENTION IMPROVES SHORT AND LONG-TERM SURVIVAL].

INTRODUCTION: Shortening door-to-balloon time intervals in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is necessary in order to limit myocardial damage. Direct admission to the cardiac care unit (CCU) facilitates this goal. We compared characteristics and short- and long-term mortality of PPCI-treated STEMI patients admitted directly to the CCU with those admitted via the emergency department (ED). METHODS: To compare 303 patients admitted directly to the CCU (42%) with 427 admitted via the ED (58%) included in the current registry comprising 730 consecutive PPCI-treated STEMI patients. RESULTS: Groups were similar regarding demographics, medical history and risk factors. Pain-to-CCU time was 151±164 minutes (median-94) for patients admitted directly and 242±226 minutes (160) for those admitted via the ED, while door-to-balloon intervals were 69±42 minutes (61) and 133±102 minutes (111), respectively. LVEF evaluated during admission (48.3±13% [47.5%] vs. 47.7±13.7% [47.5%]) and mean CK level (893±1157 [527] vs. 891±1255 [507], p=0.45) were similar between groups. Mortality was 4.2% vs. 10.3% at 30-days (p<0.002), 7.6% and 14.3% at one-year (p<0.01), reaching 12.2% and 21.9% at 3.9±2.3 years (median-3.5, p<0.004) among directly-admitted patients vs. those admitted via the ED, respectively. Long-term mortality was 4.1%, 9.4%, 21.4%, and 16% for pain-to-balloon quartiles of <140 min, 141-207 min, 208-330 min, and >330 mins, respectively (p=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Direct admission of STEMI patients to the CCU for PPCI facilitated the attainment of guidelines-dictated door-to-balloon time intervals and yielded improved short- and long-term mortality. Longer pain-to-balloon time was associated with higher long-term mortality.

Characteristics, Management, and Outcome of Transient ST-elevation Versus Persistent ST-elevation and Non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Patients with acute myocardial infarctions (AMIs) present as persistent ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or as non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). In some patients with STEMI, ST elevations are transient and resolve before coronary intervention (transient ST-elevation myocardial infarction [TSTEMI]). We analyzed our registry comprising all consecutive patients with AMI admitted during 2009 to 2014, and compared the characteristics, management, and outcome of patients with TSTEMI with those of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. Of 1,847 patients with AMI included in the registry, 1,073 patients sustained a STEMI (58%), 649 had a NSTEMI (35%), and 126 presented with TSTEMI (6.9%). Patients with TSTEMI were younger than patients with NSTEMI and STEMI (56.5 vs 62.8, p <0.001, and 59.5 years, p <0.02, respectively), smoked more (77.8 vs 54.0, p <0.001, and 62.1%, p <0.0005), and fewer were hypertensive (52.4 vs 74.2% and 58.8%, both p <0.001) and diabetic (26.2% vs 47.7%, p <0.0001, and 36.9%, p <0.02). The extent of coronary artery disease in patients with TSTEMI was similar to that of patients with STEMI except for less involvement of the left anterior descending artery (p <0.001), but less extensive than in NSTEMI patients. TSTEMI involved less myocardial damage by troponin-T level (p <0.005) with better cardiac function (LVEF 61% vs 55% and 49%, both p <0.0001). Mortality was lower among TSTEMI both in-hospital (0 vs 2.3% [p = NS] and 4.2% [p <0.01]) and long-term (4.8% vs 14.7% and 14.2%, both p <0.003) at a median of 36 months. In conclusion, TSTEMI is an acute coronary syndrome distinct from NSTEMI and STEMI, characterized by fewer risk factors, a similar extent of coronary artery disease to STEMI, but is associated with less myocardial damage and portends a better outcome.

Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus In-hospital thrombolysis as Reperfusion Therapy in Early-Arriving Low-risk STEMI Patients.

BACKGROUND: Trials have shown superiority of primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI) over in-hospital thrombolysis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated within 6-12 hours from symptom onset. These studies also included high-risk patients not all of whom underwent a therapeutic intervention. OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcome of early-arriving stable STEMI patients treated by thrombolysis with or without coronary angiography to the outcome of PPCI-treated STEMI patients. METHODS: Based on six biannual Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Surveys comprising 5474 STEMI patients, we analyzed the outcome of 1464 hemodynamically stable STEMI patients treated within 3 hours of onset. Of these, 899 patients underwent PPCI, 383 received in-hospital thrombolysis followed by angiography (TFA), and 182 were treated by thrombolysis only. RESULTS: Median time intervals from symptom onset to admission were similar while door-to-reperfusion intervals were 63, 45 and 52.5 minutes for PPCI, TFA and thrombolysis only, respectively (P < 0.001). The 30-day composite endpoint of death, post-infarction angina and myocardial infarction occurred in 77 patients of the PPCI group (8.6%), 64 patients treated by TFA (16.7%), and 36 patients of the thrombolysis only group (19.8%, P < 0.001), with differences mostly due to post-infarction angina. One-year mortality rate was 27 (3%), 13 (3.4%) and 11 (6.1%) for PPCI, TFA and thrombolysis only, respectively (P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: PPCI was superior to thrombolysis in early-arriving stable STEMI patients with regard to 30-day composite endpoint driven by a decreased incidence of post-infarction angina. No 1 year survival benefit for PPCI over thrombolysis was observed in early-arriving stable STEMI patients.

Pericardial Effusion due to Primary Malignant Pericardial Mesothelioma: A Common Finding but an Uncommon Cause.

This case report describes a 37-year-old female who was admitted to our Emergency Department because of shortness of breath. On physical examination, she had dyspnea and tachycardia and blood pressure was 80/50 mmHg with a pulsus paradoxus of 22 mmHg. Neck veins were distended, heart sounds were distant, and dullness was found on both lung bases. Her chest X-ray revealed bilateral pleural effusion and cardiomegaly. On both computed tomography and echocardiography the heart was of normal size and a large pericardial effusion was noted. The echocardiogram showed signs of impending tamponade, so the patient underwent an emergent pericardiocentesis. No infectious etiology was found and she was assumed to have viral pericarditis and was treated accordingly. However, when the pericardial effusion recurred and empirical therapy for tuberculosis failed, a pericardial window was performed. A typical staining pattern for mesothelioma was found on her pericardial biopsy specimen. Since no other mesodermal tissue was affected, a diagnosis of primary malignant pericardial mesothelioma was made. Chemotherapy was not effective and she passed away a year after the diagnosis was made. This case highlights the difficulties in diagnosing this uncommon disease in patients that present with the common finding of pericardial effusion.

Non-Invasive Lung IMPEDANCE-Guided Preemptive Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial (IMPEDANCE-HF Trial).

BACKGROUND: Previous investigations have suggested that lung impedance (LI)-guided treatment reduces hospitalizations for acute heart failure (AHF). A single-blind 2-center trial was performed to evaluate this hypothesis (ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT01315223). METHODS: The study population included 256 patients from 2 medical centers with chronic heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% in New York Heart Association class II-IV, who were admitted for AHF within 12 months before recruitment. Patients were randomized to a control group treated by clinical assessment and a monitored group whose therapy was also assisted by LI, and followed for at least 12 months. Noninvasive LI measurements were performed with a new high-sensitivity device. Patients, blinded to their assignment group, were scheduled for monthly visits in the outpatient clinics. The primary efficacy endpoint was AHF hospitalizations; the secondary endpoints were all-cause hospitalizations and mortality. RESULTS: There were 67 vs 158 AHF hospitalizations during the first year (P < .001) and 211 vs 386 AHF hospitalizations (P < .001) during the entire follow-up among the monitored patients (48 ± 32 months) and control patients (39 ± 26 months, P = .01), respectively. During the follow-up, there were 42 and 59 deaths (hazard ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.78, P = .002) with 13 and 31 of them resulting from heart failure (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.58 P < .001) in the monitored and control groups, respectively. The incidence of noncardiovascular death was similar. CONCLUSION: Our results seem to validate the concept that LI-guided preemptive treatment of chronic heart failure patients reduces hospitalizations for AHF as well as the incidence of heart failure, cardiovascular, and all-cause mortality.

Thrombolysis-facilitated primary percutaneous coronary intervention as a therapeutic approach to stent thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Stent thrombosis is a clinically significant event occurring days to weeks or, infrequently, months or years after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Current therapeutic approach is immediate PCI aimed to recanalize the occluded artery in order to restore flow and diminish irreversible myocardial damage. METHODS: We evaluated the coronary patency, TIMI flow and TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) in 6 patients presenting with STEMI due to stent thrombosis treated by thrombolysis followed by immediate PCI. These were compared with control patients treated conventionally by primary PCI. RESULTS: Immediate or early coronary angiography in the treatment group showed good coronary flow in 5 of 6 implicated arteries, whereas immediate angiography in the control group demonstrated 8 completely occluded coronary arteries of 9 with stent thrombosis. The pre-intervention TIMI flow in the control study group was 0.2±0.5 (median-0), and TMPG was 0.1±0.3 (median-0) compared with 2.1±1.1 (median-2.3, p<0.001) and 1.8±1.0 (median-2, p<0.001) in the treatment group, respectively. This striking difference in the rate of coronary patency, pre-procedural TIMI flow and TMPG, however, did not translate into better cardiac function in the treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that thrombolysis-facilitated PCI may confer benefit and need not be considered contraindicated when treating stent thrombosis. This therapeutic approach should be evaluated as a viable therapeutic approach to stent thrombosis.

Derivation of baseline lung impedance in chronic heart failure patients: use for monitoring pulmonary congestion and predicting admissions for decompensation.

The instantaneous lung impedance (ILI) is one of the methods to assess pulmonary congestion or edema (PCE) in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. Due to usually existing PCE in CHF patients when evaluated, baseline lung impedance (BLI) is unknown. Therefore, the relation of ILI to BLI is unknown. Our aim was to evaluate methods to calculate and appraise BLI or its derivative as reflecting the clinical status of CHF patients. ILI and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class were assessed in 222 patients (67 ± 11 years, LVEF <35 %) during 32 months of frequent outpatient clinic visits. ILI, measured in 120 asymptomatic patients at NYHA class I, with no congestion on the chest X-ray and a low-normal 6-min walk, was defined as BLI. Using measured BLI and ILI values in these patients, formulas for BLI calculation were derived based on logistic regression analysis or on the disparity between BLI and ILI values at different NYHA stages. Both models were equally reliable with <3 % difference between measured and calculated BLI (p = NS). ΔLIR = (ILI/BLI - 1) × 100 % reflected the degree of PCE, or deviation from baseline, correlated with NYHA class (r = -0.9, p < 0.001) and could serve for monitoring. Of study patients, 123 were re-hospitalized for PCE during follow up. Their ΔLIR decreased gradually from -21.7 ± 8.2 % 4 weeks pre-admission to -37.8 ± 9.3 % on admission (p < 0.001). Patients improved during hospital stay (NYHA 3.7 ± 0.5 to 2.9 ± 0.8, p < 0.0001) with ΔLIR increasing to -29.1 ± 12.0 % (p < 0.001). ΔLIR based on calculated BLI correlated with the clinical status of CHF patients and allowed the prediction of hospitalizations for PCE.

Relation of the systemic blood pressure to the collateral pressure distal to an infarct-related coronary artery occlusion during acute myocardial infarction.

Collaterals to occluded coronary arteries have been observed early after the onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The pressure distal to the occluded segment of the culprit coronary artery (P(d)) is generated by collateral flow from the feeding coronary artery supplied by the systemic circulation. The aim of the study was to assess the relation between systemic blood pressure (BP) and P(d). Systemic BP and P(d) were measured simultaneously during intervention of totally occluded coronary arteries in 152 patients admitted for AMI. Patients were divided into groups by time from symptom onset to P(d) measurement. There was a significant positive correlation between P(d) and the systolic, diastolic, and mean BPs measured during the first 3 hours from symptom onset (n = 60; p <0.05, p <0.006, and p <0.005, respectively), from 3 to 12 hours (n = 56; p <0.02 for all), and >12 hours after symptom onset (n = 36; p <0.003 for all). The collateral flow, represented by calculated collateral flow index (mean 0.37 ± 0.14, median 0.36), was correlated with mean BP (p = 0.05) but not with diastolic or systolic BP (p = NS) in the overall study population. A direct relation was established during AMI between systemic BP and P(d) at all time intervals from symptom onset. Collateral flow index correlated with mean BP and was strongly associated with P(d) at all time intervals. In conclusion, the relation between P(d) and systemic BP suggests caution when administering therapy that may lower systemic BP during AMI before restoring flow in the occluded culprit artery, as it may compromise collateral pressure and exacerbate myocardial ischemia.

Novel acute collateral flow index in patients with total coronary artery occlusion during ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The effect of collaterals to occluded coronary arteries during ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unclear. The conventional CVP-based formula to calculate collateral flow index during STEMI yields values higher than in elective patients, which prompted derivation of a modified formula, pertinent in STEMI when left ventricular mean diastolic pressure (LVMDP) is the extravascular pressure limiting collateral flow. We aimed to evaluate this new LVMDP-based acute collateral flow index (ACFI). METHODS AND RESULTS: The pressure distal to coronary artery occlusion (P(d)) was measured during intervention in 111 consecutive STEMI patients, 67 (61%) of whom underwent primary intervention, followed for 58 months. ACFI (0.18 ± 0.17, median 0.15) correlated with both P(d) and collateral grade (P<0.0001). Higher creatine kinase levels and white cell counts were measured in the lowest ACFI tertile compared with the highest tertile group (P<0.012). ACFI correlated slightly with early regional but not with global left ventricular ejection fraction or with long-term coronary events and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The ACFI is appropriate for evaluating collateral function during STEMI. Collateral flow during STEMI may marginally limit myocardial damage but had no effect on left ventricular contraction or long-term mortality, most likely because of the low flow provided by emerging collaterals and the high proportion of patients undergoing intervention before the beneficial effect of collaterals could be realized.

Collateral pressure and flow in acute myocardial infarction with total coronary occlusion correlate with angiographic collateral grade and creatine kinase levels.

BACKGROUND: The validity of angiographic collateral grade according to the Rentrop classification during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and its relation to flow in occluded coronary arteries before angioplasty have never been evaluated. METHODS: We assessed the validity of the angiographic collateral grade according to Rentrop classification in relation to collateral pressure and flow beyond occluded coronary arteries during AMI. Pressure distal to coronary artery occlusions before balloon dilatation was measured in 111 patients undergoing angioplasty for AMI. We calculated the collateral flow index (CFI) and compared it to observed Rentrop grade and measured creatine kinase sum. RESULTS: The values of pressure distal to coronary artery occlusions with respect to collateral grades 0 to 3 were 33 +/- 12, 37 +/- 13, 42 +/- 10, and 60 +/- 14 mm Hg (P < .0001). Overall CFI was 0.35 +/- 0.13 (median 0.33), with CFI values of 0.3 +/- 0.13, 0.33 +/- 0.13, 0.39 +/- 0.1, and 0.57 +/- 0.2 for collateral grades 0 to 3, respectively (P < .0001). Larger creatine kinase elevation (P < .016) and higher white blood cell count (P < .022) were recorded in the lowest tertile CFI compared with highest tertile CFI group; but no difference in the global, regional, or infarct-related regional left ventricular contraction was found. CONCLUSIONS: These observations demonstrate that the Rentrop classification is valid in AMI patients with occluded coronary arteries and that collaterals are recruited acutely. These collaterals, whose pressure-derived CFI during AMI was shown for the first time to be higher than its value reported in chronic conditions, may limit the immediate myocardial damage or the systemic inflammatory response. No impact on global or regional cardiac contraction was detected in a population where most patients were treated early.

Transient ST-elevation myocardial infarction: clinical course with intense medical therapy and early invasive approach, and comparison with persistent ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), whose symptoms and electrocardiographic changes completely resolve upon admission and before the administration of reperfusion therapy, pose a therapeutic dilemma. The optimal management of this syndrome, termed here as transient STEMI (TSTEMI), has not yet been fully determined. We describe 69 prospectively recorded patients with TSTEMI, of which 63 patients (56.7 +/- 11 years, 48 men) were available for long-term follow-up out of 1244 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (5%). Patients with TSTEMI treated with intravenous isosorbide dinitrate, aspirin, and clopidogrel, and/or with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were compared with a control group of matched patients with STEMI without resolution, who were treated conventionally. The time interval from symptom onset to presentation at the emergency department of patients with TSTEMI was 1.7 +/- 1.3 hours, and to first recording of ST elevations, 1.5 +/- 1.4 hours. Symptoms and electrocardiographic changes fully resolved 1.2 +/- 0.8 hours later, 1 hour after aspirin and nitrate administration. Coronary angiography, performed 36 +/- 39 hours (median, 24 hours) from admission, demonstrated no obstructive lesion or single-vessel obstructive disease in 43 patients (70%). Primary coronary intervention was performed in 48 patients (77%), and 8 patients (13%) were referred to surgery. Left ventricular ejection fraction was within normal limits, and peak creatine kinase was mildly elevated. Patients with TSTEMI had less extensive coronary artery disease (P < .038), better thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow on angiography (P < .01), lower peak creatine kinase level (P < .001), higher left ventricular ejection fraction (P < .0001), and lower likelihood to sustain a second additional coronary event after index admission (P = .024) than patients with STEMI. Transient STEMI was associated with less myocardial damage, less extensive coronary artery disease, higher thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade in culprit artery, and better cardiac function. These data suggest that immediate intense medical therapy with an early invasive approach is an appropriate therapy in patients with TSTEMI.

Internal thoracic impedance monitoring: a novel method for the preclinical detection of acute heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure (AHF) evolves through two phases. In the first phase, there is interstitial congestion with no clinical sign of edema (preclinical phase); the second, during which lung alveoli begin to fill with fluid, manifests as clinically overt alveolar edema. Treatment of AHF at its preclinical phase can alleviate its clinical impact. Presently, there is no technique that detects the interstitial phase of AHF. We used a device based on a new method of lung bioimpedance measurement. The device measures internal thoracic impedance (ITI), which nearly equals inherent lung bioimpedance. This method can detect small changes in lung fluid that occur during the interstitial stage of AHF. AIM: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of the said new method in detecting preclinical AHF. METHODS: Internal thoracic impedance and pertinent clinical parameters were monitored for 72 h in 403 patients hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome without evidence of AHF at study entry. RESULTS: Seventy patients developed AHF during monitoring. Internal thoracic impedance decreased in these patients by 16.4% (95% CI=-12.2% to -20.6%; P<.0001) from the baseline level at 44+/-15.1 min prior to the onset of lung rales. The other 333 patients had no clinical sign of AHF, and their ITI declined only by 4.5% (95% CI=2.5% to -11.5%; P=.3) compared with the baseline level. CONCLUSION: The new method for ITI measurement is sufficiently sensitive in detecting AHF at its preclinical stage. An ITI decrease of more than 12% heralds the appearance of clinically overt AHF and, thus, allows earlier therapy.

Short- and long-term outcomes of the titanium-NO stent registry.

BACKGROUND: Five to 15% of the population have allergy to nickel, chromium, or molybdenum, which is a potential cause for in-stent restenosis. The Titan stent is made of stainless steel and is coated with titanium-nitride oxide (TiNOX), which completely prevents the discharge of metal elements. We performed a real-life multicenter registry to assess the short- and long-term characteristics of the Titan stent. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 103 Titan stents was implanted in 100 patients. Patients were 61.4+/-12.6 years old (81 men). Risk factors included hypercholesterolemia (63%), hypertension (53%), diabetes mellitus (DM; 35%), and current smoking (23%). Indications for PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) were acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in 68% [acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI) in 8%], stable AP (angina pectoris) in 25%, and silent ischemia in 7% of the patients. Fifty-two percent of the treated lesions were of Type B2 or C. Lesion length was 14.3+/-2.9 mm and stent diameter was 3.06+/-0.36 mm. Indications for stenting were prevention of restenosis in 66%, residual stenosis in 33%, dissection in 13%, acute MI in 13%, and in-stent restenosis in 7% of the patients. Procedural success was 100%, with no complications. At 30 days, there were no major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, MI, and revascularization. At 180 days, only three patients had TVR (target vessel revascularization); two had TLR (target lesion revascularization) (one PCI and one CABG [coronary artery bypass grafting]), and one patient had a new narrowing proximal to the stent and underwent CABG due to multivessel disease. CONCLUSIONS: The Titan stent has a remarkable safety profile in high-risk patients and complex coronary lesions and excellent short- and long-term outcome with a very low clinical TLR rate.

Efficacy and safety of contrast injection beyond total occlusions in acute cardiac patients: a method to confirm balloon position within coronary lumen.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sensitivity and safety of contrast injection beyond total occlusions in acute cardiac patients in order to ensure balloon position within the coronary lumen and occasionally to enable the estimate of occlusion length. BACKGROUND: Percutaneous therapy of total coronary occlusions is generally more challenging than the treatment of stenotic lesions. It more frequently entails the risk of irreversibly disrupting a protruding plaque, of advancing the wire through a false route, or rarely, of causing coronary perforation. Therefore, ascertaining intraluminal position prior to inflation is important. METHODS: In a large group of consecutive acute cardiac patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) we employed a technique of crossing the lesion with a soft-tipped guidewire supported by an over-the-wire (OTW) balloon catheter, and then injecting dilute contrast through the balloon under fluoroscopy to achieve distal lumen visualization. RESULTS: In 106 patients, this technique yielded a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 70%, a positive predictive accuracy of 97%, and a negative predictive accuracy of 54% for intraluminal position of the balloon. CONCLUSIONS: The technique of lumen demonstration by contrast injection through an OTW balloon beyond acute or subacute total obstructions was shown to be a safe and effective method to ascertain proper position of the angioplasty balloon. Occasionally, it enabled the estimation of lesion length or the identification of lesions distal to the obstruction. This technique was found to be valuable in doubtful situations where the determination of wire position was crucial for achieving procedural success.