Supporting prostate cancer survivors in primary care: Findings from a pilot trial of a nurse-led psycho-educational intervention (PROSPECTIV).

PURPOSE: This study sought to test the acceptability and feasibility of a nurse-led psycho-educational intervention (NLPI) delivered in primary care to prostate cancer survivors, and to provide preliminary estimates of the effectiveness of the intervention. METHODS: Men who reported an ongoing problem with urinary, bowel, sexual or hormone-related functioning/vitality on a self-completion questionnaire were invited to participate. Participants were randomly assigned to the NLPI plus usual care, or to usual care alone. Recruitment and retention rates were assessed. Prostate-related quality of life, self-efficacy, unmet needs, and psychological morbidity were measured at baseline and 9 months. Health-care resource use data was also collected. An integrated qualitative study assessed experiences of the intervention. RESULTS: 61% eligible men (83/136) participated in the trial, with an 87% (72/83) completion rate. Interviews indicated that the intervention filled an important gap in care following treatment completion, helping men to self-manage, and improving their sense of well-being. However, only a small reduction in unmet needs and small improvement in self-efficacy was observed, and no difference in prostate-related quality of life or psychological morbidity. Patients receiving the NLPI recorded more primary care visits, while the usual care group recorded more secondary care visits. Most men (70%; (21/30)) felt the optimal time for the intervention was around the time of diagnosis/before the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest a nurse-led psycho-educational intervention in primary care is feasible, acceptable and potentially useful to prostate cancer survivors.

Symptoms, unmet needs, psychological well-being and health status in survivors of prostate cancer: implications for redesigning follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To explore ongoing symptoms, unmet needs, psychological wellbeing, self-efficacy and overall health status in survivors of prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An invitation to participate in a postal questionnaire survey was sent to 546 men, diagnosed with prostate cancer 9-24 months previously at two UK cancer centres. The study group comprised men who had been subject to a range of treatments: surgery, radiotherapy, hormone therapy and active surveillance. The questionnaire included measures of prostate-related quality of life (Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite 26-item version, EPIC-26); unmet needs (Supportive Care Needs Survey 34-item version, SCNS-SF34); anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), self-efficacy (modified Self-efficacy Scale), health status (EuroQol 5D, EQ-5D) and satisfaction with care (questions developed for this study). A single reminder was sent to non-responders after 3 weeks. Data were analysed by age, co-morbidities, and treatment group. RESULTS: In all, 316 men completed questionnaires (64.1% response rate). Overall satisfaction with follow-up care was high, but was lower for psychosocial than physical aspects of care. Urinary, bowel, and sexual functioning was reported as a moderate/big problem in the last month for 15.2% (n = 48), 5.1% (n = 16), and 36.5% (n = 105) men, respectively. The most commonly reported moderate/high unmet needs related to changes in sexual feelings/relationships, managing fear of recurrence/uncertainty, and concerns about the worries of significant others. It was found that 17% of men (51/307) reported potentially moderate-to-severe levels of anxiety and 10.2% (32/308) reported moderate-to-severe levels of depression. The presence of problematic side-effects was associated with higher psychological morbidity, poorer self-efficacy, greater unmet needs, and poorer overall health status. CONCLUSION: While some men report relatively few problems after prostate cancer treatment, this study highlights important physical and psycho-social issues for a significant minority of survivors of prostate cancer. Strategies for identifying those men with on-going problems, alongside new interventions and models of care, tailored to individual needs, are needed to improve quality of life.

An innovative method to generate a Good Manufacturing Practice-ready regulatory T-cell product from non-mobilized leukapheresis donors.

BACKGROUND AIMS: There is real and sustained interest in preparing T-regulatory cells from leukapheresis collections for cellular therapy through the use of simple, effective and reliable methods conforming to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP). We describe a GMP-ready isolation procedure for CD25(+) products with the use of a sterile docking device, pigtail sampling, a laminar flow hood and the CliniMACS system that uses leukapheresis collections made by two apheresis machines. METHODS: We used CD8/CD19 depletion followed by CD25-positive selection. The median number of CD4(+) cells recovered was 72.5 ± 32.6 × 10(6), of which 60.5% ± 17.8% were CD25(+)FOXP3(+) cells. Suppression of autologous CD25(-) cell proliferation by the cryopreserved CD25(+) products was 51.3% ± 4.4%, 49.0% ± 3.7% and 39.0% ± 3.6% at CD25(+):CD25(-) ratios of 1:1, 1:2 and 1:4 (n = 6), respectively, comparable to suppression by fresh CD25(+) products (53% ± 6.2%, 51% ± 3.3% and 39% ± 7.1%). RESULTS: We found Leukapheresis collections by Cobe Spectra contained more lymphocytes and platelets than collections by Spectra Optia apheresis machine (median, 9.2 × 10(9) versus 6.7 × 10(9); P = 0.04) and platelets (median, 610 × 10(9) versus 170 × 10(9); P = 0.04). The frequency of CD4(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+) was significantly higher in the leukapheresis (4.85%; 95% confidence interval, 1.95% to 5.38%) than in peripheral blood (3.9%; 95% confidence interval, 2.63% to 6.45%) (P = 0.02). The CD8- and CD19-negative depletion step was associated with significant loss of total CD4(+) T cells (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that functional CD25(+) products can be isolated with a GMP-ready method, and good recovery can be obtained with the use of an optimized cryopreservation protocol. These data and methods show the potential, possibilities and future work needed to isolate target cell populations in a reproducible, time-efficient and cost-efficient manner for clinical applications.

PROSPECTIV-a pilot trial of a nurse-led psychoeducational intervention delivered in primary care to prostate cancer survivors: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer survivors can experience physical, sexual, psychological and emotional problems, and there is evidence that current follow-up practices fail to meet these men's needs. Studies show that secondary and primary care physicians see a greater role for primary care in delivering follow-up, and that primary care-led follow-up is acceptable to men with prostate cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A two-phase study with target population being men who are 9-24 months from diagnosis. Phase 1 questionnaire aims to recruit 300 men and measure prostate-related quality of life and unmet needs. Men experiencing problems with urinary, bowel, sexual or hormonal function will be eligible for phase 2, a pilot trial of a primary care nurse-led psychoeducational intervention. Consenting eligible participants will be randomised either to intervention plus usual care, or usual care alone (40 men in each arm). The intervention, based on a self-management approach, underpinned by Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory, will provide advice and support tailored to these men's needs and address any problems they are experiencing. Telephone follow-up will take place at 6 months. Study outcomes will be measured by a questionnaire at 7 months. Phase 1 will allow us to estimate the prevalence of urinary, sexual, bowel and hormone-related problems in prostate cancer survivors and the level of unmet needs. 'Usual care' will also be documented. Phase 2 will provide information on recruitment and retention, acceptability of the intervention/outcome measures, effect sizes of the intervention and cost-effectiveness data, which is required to inform development of a larger, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. The main outcome of interest is change in prostate-cancer-related quality of life. Methodological issues will also be addressed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been gained (Oxford REC A 12/SC/0500). Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, at conferences, through user networks and relevant clinical groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 97242511.

Measuring angiogenic cytokines, circulating endothelial cells, and endothelial progenitor cells in peripheral blood and cord blood: VEGF and CXCL12 correlate with the number of circulating endothelial progenitor cells in peripheral blood.

Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are thought to play an important role in the vascularization of damaged tissues and cancers. These cells are also required for tissue-engineered blood vessels and to help skin substitutes revascularize more efficiently. A standard approach to the phenotyping and enumeration of CEC and EPC is key to the development of new therapies, and the identification of biomarkers within the blood that regulate their levels may be important for the treatment of cancer. We have devised an improved multiparameter flow cytometric assay for CEC and circulating EPC enumeration. This assay uses antibodies recognizing CD133 and CD34 to identify EPC and CEC, respectively, and incorporates specific markers CD144 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) for both CEC and EPC cells. In peripheral blood (PB), mean CEC numbers were 55 +/- 95 mL(-1) and mean EPC numbers were 44 +/- 58 mL(-1) (n = 60). We also found a significant correlation of both plasma VEGF (r = 0.90, p < 0.001) and CXCL12 (r = 0.84, p < 0.001) with EPCs, but not CECs. The cytokines also correlated with each other (r = 0.85, p < 0.001). In umbilical cord blood (UCB) we found on average 13 times more CEC (719 +/- 338 mL(-1)) and 7 times more EPC (299 +/- 245 mL(-1)) than in PB. However, serum VEGF and CXCL12 levels in UCB did not correlate with either EPC or CEC numbers. These results suggest a major role for VEGF and CXCL12 in the control of marrow-derived EPCs in adult PB and provide normal data for comparison with patient populations.

Estrogen stimulates differentiation of megakaryocytes and modulates their expression of estrogen receptors alpha and beta.

Estrogen has multifunctional effects influencing growth, differentiation, and function in many tissues. High-dose estrogen has been shown to produce anabolic skeletal effects in the skeleton of postmenopausal women with increased megakaryocyte (MK) population in the bone marrow, suggesting a possible role for these cells in bone remodelling. To investigate if estrogen stimulates megakaryocytopoiesis and affects on estrogen receptor (ER) expression, CD34(+) cells were cultured for 6, 9, and 14 days plus or minus low-dose or high-dose 17 beta estradiol (E). Cells were immunolocalised for CD61, CD41, ER alpha and beta. ER mRNA expression was assessed by RT-PCR. Cells formed more CD61 positive MK colonies with low- and high-dose E treatment (P < 0.001) at 6 and 9 days. CD41 expression was increased dose-dependently in MK (3- and 5-fold P < 0.001) at 9 days. E-stimulated ER alpha expression at 6 days (P < 0.001) whilst ER beta was dose-dependently increased only at 9 days (P < 0.01). ER alpha mRNA was increased at 6 days but not at 14 days whilst ER beta mRNA expression was only increased at 14 days with E treatment. These results demonstrate that E stimulates the colony forming potential of CD34(+) cells to a more megakaryocytic phenotype in vitro. This finding together with the stimulation of ER protein and mRNA expression adds to the increasing evidence for a role for MKs in estrogen-induced bone formation.