ABSTRACT
The efficacy of a brief intervention for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) was examined with nine clients. Treatment consisted of five meetings with the therapists, readings from When once is not enough (Steketee & White, 1990), and self-directed exposure with response prevention. The self-report version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale was the primary dependent measure. Participants who received treatment after a 6-week delay showed stability of severity of OCD over the waiting period. As a group, participants showed statistically significant improvement on the main outcome measures. One-third of the clients met criteria for clinically significant improvement indicating that some individuals suffering with OCD can be helped with a brief intervention.
Subject(s)
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/therapy , Psychotherapy, Brief , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
We compared a large high school area sample with normative data from prior research with college students on the Leisure Interests Checklist (LIC) factor scales, and on the BAROMAS. Whether combined or separated by sex, the college sample displayed far more interest in the LIC activities than the high school students (all P << 0.001). On the BAROMAS, differences were more complex. The teenagers expressed more confidence about dismissing time pressures, sleeping soundly and finding time to do sports, but college students were more confident about falling asleep and sticking to set priorities. The high school data replicated the previous pattern of LIC x BAROMAS relationships, with most scales significantly inter-correlated within inventories, but mainly the sports scales covarying across the two inventories. Numerous differences between the sexes emerged from the high school student sample.
