Differential effects of endothelin receptor A and B antagonism on behavioral outcome following traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVES: Previously we have reported that endothelin receptor A and B antagonists elicit differential effects on cerebral blood flow and cellular damage. In summary, endothelin receptor A antagonists restore microcirculation and diminish cellular damage after injury, while endothelin receptor B antagonists had no effect on either parameter. However, what is not known is the effect of either antagonist on behavioral outcome. Therefore, this work was designed to test the effects of endothelin receptor A and B antagonism on behavioral outcome following traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: A total of 48 male Sprague-Dawley rats (400-450 g) were used in this study. Four groups (n = 12 per group) were generated as follows: sham operation, trauma+vehicle (0·9% saline), trauma+40 nmol BQ-123 (a selective endothelin receptor A antagonist) and trauma +20 nmol BQ-788 (a selective endothelin receptor B antagonist). All treatments were delivered via intracerebroventricular injection. Trauma was induced using a weight acceleration impact device. Twenty-four hours post-injection animals were tested for 21 days on a radial arm maze task to determine cognitive outcome. RESULTS: Our data indicated that endothelin receptor A antagonism significantly reduced the extent of behavioral deficits following TBI while endothelin receptor B and vehicle injection had no effect. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that endothelin receptor A, but not endothelin receptor B, antagonism improves behavioral outcome following TBI. Furthermore, these data provide a functional correlate to previously published findings in our laboratory showing that endothelin receptor A antagonism improves both blood flow and cellular outcome following TBI. In a broader sense, this work demonstrates that hypoperfusion following TBI likely contributes to poor outcome following head injury.

Clazosentan, a novel endothelin A antagonist, improves cerebral blood flow and behavior after traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of a novel endothelin receptor A antagonist on blood flow and behavioral outcome given 30 minutes following traumatic brain injury. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats (400-450 g) were used in this study. All animals were scanned for initial blood flow using arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging (n = 72 total). Half were subjected to traumatic brain injury using a weight acceleration impact device (n = 36 total). Sham operated animals were used as control (n = 36 total). Thirty minutes following traumatic brain injury, animals were given one intravenous injection of vehicle (0·9% saline) or 1·0 mg/kg clazosentan, a novel endothelin receptor A antagonist, for a total of four groups. At 4, 24, and 48 hours post-traumatic brain injury, blood flow determination continued. On the second day post-traumatic brain injury/sham operation, behavioral testing commenced using a radial arm maze to assess cognitive function. RESULTS: Our results indicate that 1·0 mg/kg clazosentan was effective in ameliorating hypoperfusion seen after traumatic brain injury. Saline had no effect. Furthermore, clazosentan treatment was effective in significantly improving behavioral outcome following traumatic brain injury. CONCLUSION: Collectively, these results indicate that clazosentan, given at 30 minutes post-traumatic brain injury, is effective in improving outcome following injury.