Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diabet Med ; 34(5): 621-624, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27885706

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Insulin pump failure and/or malfunction requiring replacement have not been thoroughly investigated. This study evaluated pump replacement in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes using insulin pump therapy. METHODS: Data were collected for all participants younger than 19 years, starting insulin pump therapy before 31 December 2013. For each child, age, disease duration, date of insulin pump therapy initiation, insulin pump model, failure/malfunction/replacement yes/no and reason were considered for the year 2013. RESULTS: Data were returned by 40 of 43 paediatric centres belonging to the Diabetes Study Group of the Italian Society of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology. In total, 1574 of 11 311 (13.9%) children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes were using an insulin pump: 29.2% Animas VIBE™ , 9.4% Medtronic MiniMed 715/515™ , 34.3% Medtronic MiniMed VEO™ , 24.3% Accu-Check Spirit Combo™ and 2.8% other models. In 2013, 0.165 insulin pump replacements per patient-year (11.8% due to pump failure/malfunction and 4.7% due to accidental damage) were recorded. Animas VIBE™ (22.1%) and Medtronic MiniMed VEO™ (17.7%) were the most replaced. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of Italian children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes, insulin pump failure/malfunction and consequent replacement are aligned with rates previously reported and higher in more sophisticated pump models.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Equipment Failure/statistics & numerical data , Insulin Infusion Systems , Insulin/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/instrumentation , Child , Child, Preschool , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Retrospective Studies
2.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 24(5): 538-46, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24418381

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Evaluation of incidence and correlates of severe hypoglycemia (SH) and diabetes ketoacidosis (DKA) in children and adolescents with T1DM. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective study conducted in 29 diabetes centers from November 2011 to April 2012. The incidence of SH and DKA episodes and their correlates were assessed through a questionnaire administered to parents of patients aged 0-18 years. Incidence rates and incident rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated through multivariate Poisson regression analysis and multilevel analysis. Overall, 2025 patients were included (age 12.4 ± 3.8 years; 53% males; diabetes duration 5.6 ± 3.5 years; HbA1c 7.9 ± 1.1%). The incidence of SH and DKA were of 7.7 and 2.4 events/100 py, respectively. The risk of SH was higher in females (IRR = 1.44; 95%CI 1.04-1.99), in patients using rapid acting analogues as compared to regular insulin (IRR = 1.48; 95%CI 0.97-2.26) and lower for patients using long acting analogues as compared to NPH insulin (IRR = 0.40; 95%CI 0.19-0.85). No correlations were found between SH and HbA1c levels. The risk of DKA was higher in patients using rapid acting analogues (IRR = 4.25; 95%CI 1.01-17.86) and increased with insulin units needed (IRR = 7.66; 95%CI 2.83-20.74) and HbA1c levels (IRR = 1.63; 95%CI 1.36-1.95). Mother's age was inversely associated with the risk of both SH (IRR = 0.95; 95%CI 0.92-0.98) and DKA (IRR = 0.94; 95%CI 0.88-0.99). When accounting for center effect, the risk of SH associated with the use of rapid acting insulin analogues was attenuated (IRR = 1.48; 95%CI 0.97-2.26); 33% and 16% of the residual variance in SH and DKA risk was explained by center effect. CONCLUSION: The risk of SH and DKA is mainly associated with treatment modalities and strongly depends on the practice of specialist centers.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Hypoglycemia/epidemiology , Ketosis/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Hypoglycemia/etiology , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Incidence , Infant , Insulin/therapeutic use , Insulin, Isophane/therapeutic use , Italy/epidemiology , Ketosis/etiology , Male , Retrospective Studies
3.
Acta Diabetol ; 51(1): 43-51, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23508374

ABSTRACT

A multi-centre, observational, cross-sectional study was carried out to determine whether the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adolescents with type 1 diabetes is affected by different insulin treatment systems, and which features of HRQOL are impacted by the respective insulin treatment. The study regarded 577 adolescents, aged 10-17 years, with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) (n = 306) or multiple daily injections (MDI) (n = 271). The Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire was validated in Italian and was self-completed by the subjects during a routine visit to the centres. Subjects were compared following the domains of the questionnaire. Good HRQOL was seen in subjects treated with either MDI or CSII. Significant differences were not found in the domains for general diabetes, including diabetes worries, social burden and psychological well-being. Multiple quantile regression analysis showed that CSII confers significant advantages in terms of HRQOL with improvements in treatment satisfaction, perceived clinical efficacy and reduction in treatment interference with daily activities. This favourable impact was more evident in subjects reporting lower HRQOL scores, suggesting that CSII may be especially useful for individuals perceiving a poor HRQOL. Analysis of the domains indicated that CSII was associated with a higher HRQOL than MDI. Life-course HRQOL evaluation using a standardised questionnaire can ensure better chronic disease management. This is particularly important when providing individualised care for adolescents, as they become increasingly responsible for managing their diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/psychology , Insulin/administration & dosage , Patient Preference , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Child , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Female , Health Status , Humans , Infusions, Subcutaneous , Insulin Infusion Systems , Male , Patient Preference/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...