Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Emerg Microbes Infect ; 13(1): 2348521, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38686548

ABSTRACT

A free-range organic broiler (Gallus gallus domesticus) premises in Staffordshire was infected by high pathogenicity avian influenza virus (HPAIV) H5N8 during the 2020-2021 epizootic in the United Kingdom (UK). Following initial confirmation of the infection in poultry, multiple wild bird species were seen scavenging on chicken carcasses. Detected dead wild birds were subsequently demonstrated to have been infected and succumbed to HPAIV H5N8. Initially, scavenging species, magpie (Pica pica) and raven (Corvus corax) were found dead on the premises but over the following days, buzzards (Buteo buteo) were also found dead within the local area with positive detection of HPAIV in submitted carcasses. The subacute nature of microscopic lesions within a buzzard was consistent with the timeframe of infection. Finally, a considerable number of free-living pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) were also found dead in the surrounding area, with carcasses having higher viral antigen loads compared to infected chickens. Limited virus dissemination was observed in the carcasses of the magpie, raven, and buzzard. Further, an avirulent avian paramyxovirus type 1 (APMV-1) was detected within poultry samples as well as in the viscera of a magpie infected with HPAIV. Immunohistochemistry did not reveal colocalization of avian paramyxovirus antigens with lesions, supporting an avirulent APMV-1 infection. Overall, this case highlights scenarios in which bi-directional transmission of avian viral diseases between commercial and wild bird species may occur. It also underlines the importance of bio separation and reduced access when infection pressure from HPAIV is high.


Subject(s)
Animals, Wild , Chickens , Disease Outbreaks , Influenza A Virus, H5N8 Subtype , Influenza in Birds , Poultry Diseases , Animals , Influenza in Birds/transmission , Influenza in Birds/virology , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Chickens/virology , Animals, Wild/virology , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Influenza A Virus, H5N8 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H5N8 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza A Virus, H5N8 Subtype/genetics , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Poultry Diseases/virology , Poultry Diseases/transmission , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Poultry/virology , Crows/virology , Birds/virology
2.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 69(4): e104-e118, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34333857

ABSTRACT

The incidence of bovine tuberculosis (TB, caused by Mycobacterium bovis) in cattle has been associated with TB in badgers (Meles meles) in parts of England. The aim was to identify badger-associated M. bovis reservoirs in the Edge Area, between the High- and Low-Risk Areas for cattle TB. Data from badger TB surveys were sparse. Therefore, a definition for a local M. bovis reservoir potentially shared by cattle and badgers was developed using cattle TB surveillance data. The performance of the definition was estimated through Latent Class Analysis using badger TB survey data. Spatial units (25 km2 ) in the Edge Area were classified as having a reservoir if they had (i) at least one TB incident in at least three of the previous 7 years, (ii) at least one TB incident in a cattle herd confirmed by post-mortem tests as due to M. bovis infection and not attributable to cattle movements in the previous 2 years and (iii) more confirmed TB incidents than un-confirmed in the previous 2 years. Approximately 20% of the Edge Area was classified as having a local M. bovis reservoir using the cattle-based definition. Assuming 15% TB prevalence in Edge Area badgers, sensitivity for the local M. bovis reservoir definition varied from 25.7% [95% credible interval (CrI): 10.7%-85.1%] to 64.8% (95% CrI: 48.1%-88.0%). Specificity was 91.9% (CrI: 83.6%-97.4%). Over 90% of the local reservoir was in stable endemic TB areas identified through previous work and its spatial distribution was largely consistent with local veterinary knowledge. Uncertainty in the reservoir spatial distribution was explored through its recalculation in spatial units shifted in different directions. We recommend that the definition is re-evaluated as further data on badger infection with M. bovis become available.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases , Mustelidae , Mycobacterium bovis , Tuberculosis, Bovine , Animals , Cattle , Disease Reservoirs/microbiology , Disease Reservoirs/veterinary , Incidence , Mustelidae/microbiology , Prevalence , Tuberculosis, Bovine/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...