Relationship of psychosocial factors and musculoskeletal pain among individuals with newly acquired spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data of a longitudinal cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Little evidence exists on pain-related psychosocial factors in individuals with newly acquired spinal cord injury (SCI). To understand a biopsychosocial model of pain, we must first understand the presenting psychological pain-related factors at injury onset. Therefore, we assessed musculoskeletal pain and pain-related psychological constructs in a group of individuals with newly acquired SCI. We hypothesized that individuals with new SCI would report musculoskeletal shoulder pain with elevated levels of kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing. SETTING: Data were collected in three rehabilitation hospitals located in urban and suburban communities. METHODS: Thirty-five individuals with newly acquired SCI participated. Demographics, Musculoskeletal Pain Survey shoulder subscale, Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale-11, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Fear of Pain Questionnaire, Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-42, and Subjective Quality of Life Questionnaire were administered. Descriptive analysis of all measures was determined and relationships between pain and psychosocial measures determined. RESULTS: Moderate shoulder pain existed in 40% of people with new SCI along with clinically elevated kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, fear of pain, and reduced quality of life. Shoulder pain was statistically associated with pain catastrophizing (ρ = 0.41, p = 0.01). Kinesiophobia positively correlated with fear of pain (ρ = 0.38, p = 0.02) with an inverse relationship to quality of life (ρ = -0.47, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated pain, and pain-related psychological characteristics, such as catastrophizing and kinesiophobia exist during the early stages after SCI. Early identification of pain-related factors can guide clinical intervention potentially ameliorating pain-linked functional impairments. TRIAL REGISTRY: This trial is registered with ClinTrial.gov ID NCT03137394.

A comparison of prefabricated and custom made resting hand splints for individuals with cervical spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare prefabricated and custom resting hand splints and establish the feasibility of splinting research for larger scale trials. DESIGN: A Randomized controlled pilot study where the randomization unit was each hand, rather than each individual. SETTING: Thirty-two-bed spinal cord injury and multi-trauma rehabilitation unit in an urban academic rehabilitation center. SUBJECTS: Thirty-six hands from 19 individuals with cervical spinal cord injury were enrolled during their acute rehabilitation stay. INTERVENTIONS: Each eligible hand was randomized to receive a custom or prefabricated resting hand splint for night use. MAIN MEASURES: The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation and Prehension (GRASSP) was completed at both admission and discharge, and a structured interview was completed at discharge. RESULTS: No difference existed in GRASSP outcomes or user preference between custom and prefabricated resting hand splints. Mann-Whitney tests indicated that there was no significant difference in qualitative prehension scores (U = 141, P = 0.522) nor quantitative prehension scores (U = 135, P = 0.382) between groups. Adherence to the splinting program was high (18 out of 19 participants), and no adverse effects occurred. Four themes emerged from the participant comments: the participants felt splints were helpful in their recovery; they found it challenging to direct their caregivers to help with the splints; they needed to take ownership for managing their splints; and they wished they received more education on splint rationale. CONCLUSION: There was no obvious difference in outcome or user preference between prefabricated and custom resting hand splints.

Shoulder impairment and pain of individuals with newly acquired spinal cord injury compared to uninjured peers.

STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Shoulder pain prevalence is high in those with spinal cord injury (SCI) and is associated with decreased function, participation restrictions and decreased quality of life. Limited evidence exists regarding physical impairments of newly acquired SCI. The current study compared musculoskeletal factors at rehabilitation initiation in individuals with newly acquired SCI to uninjured individuals. We hypothesized no impairment differences of shoulder pain, strength, mobility, muscle extensibility, or rotator cuff integrity would exist between groups. SETTING: Multi-site laboratory setting. METHODS: Thirty-five individuals with newly acquired SCI and age and gender-matched controls without SCI (n = 34) participated. Musculoskeletal Pain Survey, shoulder range of motion (ROM), strength, pectoralis minor muscle extensibility (PM) and tissue integrity [Ultrasound Pathology Rating Scale (USPRS)] were obtained. RESULTS: Higher pain was reported by individuals experiencing new SCI along with lower strength across all bilateral measures, reduced elevation, external rotation, and horizontal adduction ROM, with large effect sizes. PM bilateral extensibility was reduced compared to controls, with moderate between group effect size; however, no USPRS score difference existed. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided the first comprehensive clinical description for individuals with newly acquired SCI. In comparison to matched uninjured controls, participants with new SCI reported greater shoulder pain with impairments in mobility, strength, and extensibility. The identified early clinical impairments aligned with progressive impairment including further pain development and persistence. Awareness and modification of these early clinical impairments may lead to improved long-term outcomes, improving the overall health and well-being of individuals with newly acquired SCI. SPONSORSHIP: Spinal Cord Injury Research Program Investigator-Initiated Research Award under Award No. W81XWH-17-1-0476.

Current U.S. splinting practices for individuals with cervical spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Survey research design. OBJECTIVE: To understand current splinting practices of occupational therapists working with individuals with spinal cord injury. SETTING: The United States. METHODS: An online survey was emailed to occupational therapists working in U.S. inpatient spinal cord rehabilitation facilities. The survey included questions about hand splinting practices in their patients with cervical spinal cord injury. RESULTS: Sixty-five occupational therapists in 21 different states completed the survey. They reported that current and predicted hand function was the primary principle guiding splint decision making. Across all levels of cervical SCI, resting hand splints are commonly prescribed for night use, and 64.6% of respondents stated they typically recommend them for individuals without active arm movement. Most respondents (73.8%) also report prescribing wrist splints for day use for individuals without active wrist movement. Survey results indicate that therapists are using splints less frequently overall for all levels of injury. The long-opponens splint is no longer being used regularly in SCI and the MCP block splint is being used more frequently. CONCLUSION: Survey responses indicated that splinting is standard care for individuals with cervical spinal cord injury and that the level of SCI dictates specific recommendations. Splint practice guidelines are a framework for intervention mediated by case-specific clinical reasoning and client input.

Functional passive range of motion of individuals with chronic cervical spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: Functional passive range of motion (PROM) requirements for individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) are clinically accepted despite limited evidence defining the specific PROM needed to perform functional tasks. The objective of this investigation was to better define the minimum PROM needed for individuals with cervical SCI to achieve optimal functional ability, and as a secondary outcome gather self-reported standardized functional data via the Spinal Cord Independence Measure-III (SCIM-III), and the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Index (SCI-FI). DESIGN: Observational cohort. SETTING: 128-bed rehabilitation hospital with inpatient and outpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation programs. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 29 community-dwelling individuals with chronic (greater than one year) tetraplegic SCI (C5-8) who use a wheelchair for mobility. INTERVENTIONS: None. OUTCOME MEASURES: Therapist goniometric measurement of upper and lower extremity PROM, and participant completion of a demographic questionnaire and two functional self-report measures (SCIM-III and SCI-FI) were completed. RESULTS: Compared to the general population, differences observed in our study participants included limitations in forearm pronation and elbow extension and increased shoulder extension and wrist extension (likely related to prop sitting). Elbow hyperextension was noted in one-third of the participants. Limitations in straight leg raise, hip flexion, abduction, and internal rotation, in combination with increased hip external rotation suggested these individuals with cervical SCI potentially completed activities of daily living (ADLs) in frog-sitting, rather than long-sitting. Ankle plantarflexion contractures were found in many participants. Shoulder horizontal adduction, elbow extension, hip flexion, knee flexion, ankle plantarflexion, and forefoot eversion ROM were associated with functional performance. CONCLUSION: Based on our results healthcare providers should work with individuals with cervical SCI to develop long term PROM plans to optimize functional abilities.

Atypical autonomic dysreflexia during robotic-assisted body weight supported treadmill training in an individual with motor incomplete spinal cord injury.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: A 41-year-old man with a history of C6 American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) C spinal cord injury (SCI), enrolled in an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, robotic-assisted body weight-supported treadmill training (BWSTT), and aquatic exercise research protocol developed asymptomatic autonomic dysreflexia (AD) during training. Little information is available regarding the relationship of robotic-assisted BWSTT and AD. FINDINGS: After successfully completing 36 sessions of aquatic exercise, he reported exertional fatigue during his 10th Lokomat intervention and exhibited asymptomatic or silent AD during this and the three subsequent BWSTT sessions. Standard facilitators of AD were assessed and no obvious irritant identified other than the actual physical exertion and positioning required during robotic-assisted BWSTT. CONCLUSIONS/CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Increased awareness of potential silent AD presenting during robotic assisted BWSTT training for individuals with motor incomplete SCI is required as in this case AD clinical signs were not concurrent with occurrence. Frequent vital sign assessment before, during, and at conclusion of each BWSTT session is strongly recommended.