A novel multiplex electrochemiluminescent immunoassay for detection and quantification of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and anti-seasonal endemic human coronavirus IgG.

BACKGROUND: Multiplex immunoassays capture a comprehensive profile of the humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 and human endemic coronaviruses. We validated a multiplex panel (V-PLEX Panel 2) from Meso Scale Diagnostics targeting antibodies against nine coronavirus antigens. Performance was compared against alternative single- and multi-antigen immunoassays. METHODS: Sera collected for clinical or public health testing from 2018 to 2020 (n = 135) were used to compare all tested platforms, and inter-test agreement was assessed by Cohen's kappa coefficient. Sample category (positive/negative) was assigned based on collection date relative to the index case in Canada, and SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serology results. 117 out of the 135 samples (31 positive, 86 negative) were assigned a category and were used to calculate sensitivity and specificity, with MSD's test results based upon manufacturer-set cut-offs. RESULTS: We observed SARS-CoV-2 target sensitivities of 100% and specificities >94% for all antigens (RBD, Nucleocapsid, Spike) in V-PLEX Panel 2. When targets were combined, we found a SARS-CoV-2 sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 98.8% with no difference in performance compared to clinical assays, and Cohen's kappa ranging from 0.798 to 0.945 compared to surface plasmon resonance imaging (SPRi). Quantitative measurements of antibodies against the Spike protein of endemic human coronaviruses were concordant with SPRi. CONCLUSION: Meso Scale Diagnostics' V-PLEX Coronavirus Panel 2 allows for highly sensitive and specific detection of anti-coronavirus IgG, and is concordant with other serological assays for detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and the endemic human coronaviruses, making it a good tool for humoral response characterization after both infection and vaccination.

MuSK not MNGIE: Atypical MuSK-antibody myasthenia presenting as a genetic disorder.

Myasthenia gravis is a treatable autoimmune disease caused by autoantibodies directed against membrane proteins at the neuromuscular junction. While acetylcholine receptor antibodies are most common, a minority of patients have antibodies directed against muscle-specific kinase (MuSK-antibody). Differentiating features often include subacute onset and rapid progression of bulbar, respiratory and neck extensor muscles, with sparing of distal appendicular muscles, most commonly in middle-aged females. Here we present an atypical presentation of MuSK-antibody myasthenic syndrome in a young male consisting of a gradual-onset, insidiously-progressive, non-fatigable and non-fluctuating ocular, bulbar and oesophageal weakness, with a normal frontalis single fibre EMG. This case clinically resembled a mitochondrial myopathy (Mitochondrial Neurogastrointestinal Encephalopathy-MNGIE) with a poor prognosis. Because of the atypical presentation, MuSK antibodies were identified very late in the disease course, at which point the patient responded very well to immunotherapy. We report an unusual presentation of an uncommon but treatable condition, illustrating significant phenotypic heterogeneity possible in MuSK-antibody myasthenic syndrome.

Immunopathology of Autoimmune Myasthenia Gravis: Implications for Improved Testing Algorithms and Treatment Strategies.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a heterogeneous condition, characterized by autoantibodies (Abs) that target functionally important structures within neuromuscular junctions (NMJ), thus affecting nerve-to-muscle transmission. MG patients are more often now subgrouped based on the profile of serum autoantibodies, which segregate with clinical presentation, immunopathology, and their response to therapies. The serological testing plays an essential role in confirming MG diagnosis and guiding disease management, although a small percentage of MG patients remain negative for antibodies. With the advancements in new highly effective pathophysiologically-specific immunotherapeutic options, it has become increasingly important to identify the specific Abs responsible for the pathogenicity in individual MG patients. There are several new assays and protocols being developed for the improved detection of Abs in MG patients. This review focuses on the divergent immunopathological mechanisms in MG, and discusses their relevance to improved diagnostic and treatment. We propose a comprehensive "reflex testing," algorithm for the presence of MG autoantibodies, and foresee that in the near future, the convenience and specificity of novel assays will permit the clinicians to consider them into routine systematic testing, thus stimulating laboratories to make these tests available. Moreover, adopting treatment driven testing algorithms will be crucial to identify subgroups of patients potentially benefiting from novel immunotherapies for MG.

An update on laboratory diagnosis in myasthenia gravis.

This review describes the state of the art for the use of laboratory testing in myasthenia gravis. The review brings a detailed description of the different clinical forms of auto-immune myasthenia and of the Lambert Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS). They stress the differences between the different forms of acquired (auto-immune) myasthenia. Then they present a summary of the different antibodies found in the disease. They insist on the advantage of the RIPA assay to measure antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor. They stress the different types of contribution of each of these antibodies to the clinical diagnosis. They also describe the methods to measure each of the specific antibodies that have recently permitted to split the diagnosis: Abs to omega-conotoxin receptor in Lambert Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS), abs to the acetylcholine receptor (AchR) in MG, Abs to muscle specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) in Ab negative MG, and Abs to low molecular weight receptor related low-density lipo protein-4 (LRP-4). They also broach over the striated antibodies, less frequent and clinically less useful such as anti-titin, -ryanodine, -agrin and -rapsyn. This represent a 360° view of the field as presented in Toronto in October 2014.

An update on laboratory diagnosis in myasthenia gravis.

This review describes the state of the art for the use of laboratory testing in myasthenia gravis. The review brings a detailed description of the different clinical forms of auto-immune myasthenia and of the Lambert Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS). The stress the differences between the different forms of acquired (auto-immune) myasthenia. Then they present a summary of the different antibodies found in the disease. They insist on the advantage of the RIPA assay to measure antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor. They stress the different types of contribution of each of these antibodies to the clinical diagnosis. They also describe the methods to measure each of the specific antibodies that have recently permitted to split the diagnosis: Abs to omega-conotoxin receptor in Lambert Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS), abs to the acetylcholine receptor (AchR) in MG, Abs to muscle specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) in Ab negative MG, and Abs to low molecular weight receptor related low-density lipo protein-4 (LRP-4). They also broach over the striated antibodies, less frequent and clinically less useful such as anti-titin, -ryanodine, -agrin and -rapsyn. This represent a 360° view of the field as presented in Toronto in October 2014.