Long-term outcomes of mitral valve replacement in dialysis patients: evidence from a nationwide database.

BACKGROUND: To compare the late outcomes between mechanical and bioprostheses after isolated mitral valve replacement (MVR) in dialysis-dependent patients. METHODS: A nationwide propensity-matched retrospective cohort study was conducted involving dialysis patients who underwent primary mitral replacement between 2001 and 2018. Ten-year postoperative outcomes were compared between mitral bioprosthesis and mechanical prosthesis using the Cox proportional hazard model and restricted mean survival time (RMST). RESULTS: The all-cause mortality was 20.8 and 13.0 events per 100 person-years, with a 10-year RMST of 7.40 and 7.31 years for bioprosthesis and mechanical prosthesis, respectively. Major bleeding was the most common adverse event for both bioprosthesis and mechanical prosthesis, with an incidence rate of 19.5 and 19.1 events per 100 person-years, respectively. The incidence of valve reoperation was higher among those who received bioprosthesis (0.55 events per 100 person-years). After 1:1 matching, the all-cause mortality was 15.45 and 14.54 events per 100 person-years for bioprosthesis and mechanical prosthesis, respectively. The RMST at 10 years was comparable between the two groups after matching (5.10 years for bioprosthesis vs. 4.59 years for mechanical prosthesis), with an RMST difference of -0.03. Further, no difference was observed in the incidence of major adverse valve-related events between bioprosthesis and mechanical valves. However, bioprosthesis was associated with a higher incidence of mitral valve reoperation among all major adverse events (RMST difference -0.24 years, 95% CI -0.48 to -0.01, P =0.047). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no association between valve selection and long-term survival outcomes in dialysis patients after MVR. However, bioprosthetic valves may be associated with a slightly higher incidence of reoperation, while other valve-related adverse events, including major bleeding and stroke, were comparable between the two types of prostheses.

Long-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement in dialysis patients - a nationwide retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Improved durability of modern biologic prostheses and growing experience with the transcatheter valve-in-valve technique have contributed to a substantial increase in the use of bioprostheses in younger patients. However, discussion of prosthetic valve selection in dialysis patients remains scarce as the guidelines are updated. This study aims to compare long-term outcomes between propensity score-matched cohorts of dialysis patients who underwent primary aortic valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis or a bioprosthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Longitudinal data of dialysis patients who underwent primary aortic valve replacement between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2018, were retrieved from the National Health Insurance Research Database. RESULTS: A total of 891 eligible patients were identified, of whom 243 ideally matched pairs of patients were analyzed. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.11, 95% CI: 0.88-1.40) or the incidence of major adverse prosthesis-related events between the two groups (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI: 0.84-1.25). In patients younger than 50 years of age, using a mechanical prosthesis was associated with a significantly longer survival time across 10 years of follow-up than using a bioprosthesis (restricted mean survival time) at 10 years: 7.24 (95% CI: 6.33-8.14) years for mechanical prosthesis versus 5.25 (95% CI: 4.25-6.25) years for bioprosthesis, restricted mean survival time difference 1.99 years, 95% CI: -3.34 to -0.64). CONCLUSION: A 2-year survival gain in favor of mechanical prostheses was identified in dialysis patients younger than 50 years. The authors suggest mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in these younger patients.

A Randomized Trial of Postoperative Handgrip Exercises for Fistula Maturation in Patients With Newly Created Wrist Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistulas.

Introduction: We aimed to substantiate the benefit of postoperative handgrip exercises (HGEs) in enhancing the maturation of an arteriovenous wrist fistula. Methods: We randomly assigned 119 patients aged 20 to 80 years who had wrist arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) to undergo either a basic HGE program (group A), an advanced program (group B), or an advanced-plus upper arm banding program (group C). Outcomes were assessed by ultrasonographic evaluation of the diameter and flow at each follow-up. The attending nephrologist decided the clinical use of the fistula. Results: We identified no significant differences among the HGE groups in the mean diameter and blood flow 14, 30, 60, and 90 days after the creation of the wrist AVF (P = 0.55, 0.88, 0.21, and 0.19 for the diameter; 0.94, 0.81, 0.49, and 0.56 for the flow, respectively). The intent-to-treat analysis also found no difference in the clinical use of fistulas for hemodialysis (HD) (P = 0.997). Conclusion: In patients with a newly created wrist AVF, advancing frequency, with or without adding intensity using an upper arm tourniquet, of postoperative HGEs did not enhance the growth of the fistula or increase the rate of clinical use over 3 months. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03077815).

Outcomes of pediatric patients supported with ventricular assist devices single center experience.

BACKGROUND: There has been a remarkable increase in the number of pediatric ventricular assist device (VAD) implanted over the past decade. Asian pediatric heart centers had not participated in the multicenter registries among the Western countries. This article aimed to report the outcomes of pediatric VAD in our hospital. METHODS: The study enrolled all patients aged <18 years at the time of VAD implantation in our institution between 2008 and 2021. RESULTS: There were 33 patients with diagnosis of acute fulminant myocarditis (n = 9), congenital heart disease (n = 5), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 16), and others. Paracorporeal continuous-flow pump was the most frequently implanted (n = 27). Most of the devices were implanted in patients with INTERMACS profile 1 (n = 24). The median duration on VAD was 22 days (range 2-254). The proportion of patients attaining positive outcomes (alive on device, bridge to transplantation or recovery) was 72.7% at 1 month, 67.7% at 3 months, and 67.7% at 6 months. Most of the deaths on device occurred within the first month post-implant (n = 9), with neurological complications being the most frequent cause of death. All recovered cases were successfully weaned off the device within the first month of implantation. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a favorable outcome in pediatric patients supported with VAD at our institution.

Extreme size mismatch: bronchus compression by an oversized donor heart in small children.

Studies have suggested that a more liberal criterion of donor-recipient weight ratio (DRWR) is associated with superior waitlist survival without compromising posttransplant outcomes in selected critically ill patients. Successful transplantation of an extremely oversized donor heart into a small recipient is herein described. A 2-year-old girl accepted a size-mismatched adult donor heart offer (DRWR of 4.4) due to frequent complications with a left ventricular assist device. During the immediate postoperative period, spatial constraints within the thoracic cavity compromised graft function. Computed tomography revealed severe compression of the left bronchus due to the oversized allograft with lobar collapse of the left lung. With temporary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, graft function improved within 1 month after transplantation. Subsequent adaptive size remodeling of the transplanted heart with concomitant left bronchus re-expansion was observed within 6 months after transplantation. Despite a complicated posttransplant recovery, the patient was discharged home with minimal respiratory sequelae. Our report describes an alternative strategy for managing early morbidities related to an oversized graft and supports extending the criteria of size matching in pediatric heart transplantations.

Impact of duration of mechanical support on heart transplantation: Hasty transplantation may not have a good long-term outcome.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been widely utilized in critically ill cardiac transplant candidates. Few studies have investigated the impact of duration of MCS before heart transplantation (HTx) on long-term patient survival. METHODS: A retrospective HTx database was reviewed between 2009 and 2019. Patients who did not or did undergo MCS before HTx were categorized into two groups: (1) A (did not) and (2) B (did), respectively. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the cutoff level of MCS duration before HTx in evaluating 5-year survival. RESULT: A total of 270 HTx patients (group A: 120, group B: 150) were analyzed. Group B patients had a higher percentage of blood type O, a higher incidence of resuscitation, a shorter listing duration, and a higher likelihood of having United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) 1A status than group A. The ROC curve revealed 24 days as a good cut-off level for determining the best MCS before HTx timing. Group B was categorized into two subgroups: (1) B1 (MCS < 24 days, n = 65) and (2) B2 (MCS > 24 days, n = 85). B2 had a higher incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), hemodialysis, longer waiting time after MCS, and better ventricular assist device implantation than B1. However, the survival curves showed that B1 outcomes were significantly worse than in groups A and B2. Groups A and B2 had similar survival curves without an increased incidence of infection. CONCLUSION: The preliminary data demonstrated that a longer duration of MCS may be associated with better outcomes than urgent HTx.

Outcome of urgent desensitization in sensitized heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Sensitization, the presence of preformed anti-human antibody in recipients, restricts access to ABO-compatible donors in heart transplant. Desensitization therapy works by reducing preformed antibodies to increase the chances of a negative crossmatch or permit safe transplantation across positive crossmatch. There is no consensus regarding the desensitization protocol in cardiac patients, and the outcome of desensitization remains under debate. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive sensitized heart transplant recipients received perioperative desensitization in our institution from 2012 to 2019. One-year patient survival and graft rejection rate were analyzed and compared between sensitized recipients and non-sensitized recipients. RESULTS: Within the first year after transplant, patient survival in sensitized recipients was 76%. Infection was the major cause of death. The cumulative incidence of rejection was 8% for antibody-mediated rejection and 16% for acute cellular rejection. No significant difference in 1-year survival or rejection rate could be demonstrated between sensitized and nonsensitized recipients. CONCLUSION: Acceptable early outcomes in patient survival and graft rejection could be anticipated in sensitized heart transplant recipients under a perioperative algorithm using complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch- or panel-reactive antibody-directed urgent immunomodulation strategies, while infection remains the major concern.

Comparison of robotic and conventional sternotomy in redo mitral valve surgery.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Redo operation for mitral valve surgery carries higher risks than first time cardiac surgery. The adhesion between sternum and heart, and also the complexity of second time operation make the redo operation more difficult. The robotic surgery carries some benefit in terms of magnification, assisted by the scope view and precise movement of the instruments. We compared the results of our robotic redo mitral valve surgeries with those of conventional re-sternotomy. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent redo mitral valve surgeries between 2012 and 2019 at our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, patients' medical histories, presenting symptoms, image analyses, echocardiogram data, operative procedures and postoperative clinical outcomes were collected through chart review. RESULTS: A total of 67 redo mitral valve surgeries, including 23 robotic and 44 re-sternotomy procedures were performed. There were no differences in age, previous operation times, and intervals to previous surgery. Comorbidities of both groups were similar. There was no surgical mortality in the robotic group, and it was 9.0% in the re-sternotomy group (p = 0.287). Operation time was shorter in the robotic group (176 vs. 321 min; robotic vs. re-sternotomy, p＝0.0279). Blood transfusion was lower in the robotic group (1 vs. 2 units; robotic vs. re-sternotomy, p = 0.01189). The ventilation time, ICU stay time, and recheck bleeding rate were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: In select patients, robotic redo mitral valve surgery is safe and feasible. It could offer low operative mortality. It is associated with shorter operative times, than re-sternotomy and provides equal immediate operative results.

Risk factor for acute kidney injury in patients with chronic kidney disease receiving valve surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients with pre-existing impaired renal function carries deleterious outcomes but is not frequently evaluated. The optimal CPB strategy for preventing AKI in this vulnerable patient group is still controversial. METHODS: A total of 156 patients with preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) <30 ml/min but not on chronic dialysis receiving valve operation under CPB were included in the present study. Postoperative AKI was defined as KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) stage 3. Hospital mortality and two-year renal function evolution were compared between patients with postoperative AKI and those without AKI. Risk factors for the development of postoperative AKI were also studied. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative KDIGO-3 was high (44.2%). Hospital mortality was higher in the AKI group (30.4%) than in the non-AKI group (8.0%). Among the hospital survivors, renal function deterioration to permanent dialysis at two years was also more common in AKI group (14.5%) than in non-AKI group (4.6%). Univariate logistic regression for postoperative AKI revealed male gender, increased age, height, weight, BSA, and BMI, high preoperative serum creatinine, prolonged CPB duration, and decreased CPB target temperature as risk factors. However, multivariate analysis revealed only high preoperative serum creatinine and decreased CPB target temperature as significant risk factors for postoperative AKI. CONCLUSION: To prevent postoperative AKI in CKD patients, low CPB target temperature is avoided, especially for those with high preoperative serum creatinine levels.

Intracardiac foreign body resulting from a transmediastinal gunshot mimics an extracardiac foreign body: An image presentation.

A transmediastinal gunshot wound (TMGW) is one of the most severe traumatic injuries, with a high mortality rate. Prompt diagnosis and emergency surgical intervention with or without cardiopulmonary bypass are usually required to save lives. We report a particular case of TMGW in which the computed tomography imaging findings indicated an extracardiac foreign body. However, intraoperative findings revealed an intracardiac foreign body, and urgent cardiopulmonary bypass was performed to remove the foreign body. We suggest that cardiopulmonary bypass should be on standby during an exploratory sternotomy for TMGW, when the trajectory of the bullet hints at a cardiac-penetrating injury according to imaging studies and the location of the bullet remains unaffected by the patient's postural changes.