Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Hypertens Pregnancy ; 43(1): 2308922, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38279906

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy has been linked with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). The aim of this study was to examine how both trimester and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection impact HDP. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals during pregnancy (n = 205) and examined the association between trimester and severity of infection with incidence of HDP using modified Poisson regression models to calculate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We stratified the analysis of trimester by severity to understand the role of timing of infection among those with similar symptomatology and also examined timing of infection as a continuous variable. RESULTS: Compared to a reference cohort from 2018, SARS-CoV-2 infection did not largely increase the risk of HDP (RR: 1.17; CI:0.90, 1.51), but a non-statistically significant higher risk of preeclampsia was observed (RR: 1.33; CI:0.89, 1.98), in our small sample. Among the SARS-CoV-2 cohort, severity was linked with risk of HDP, with infections requiring hospitalization increasing the risk of HDP compared to asymptomatic/mild infections. Trimester of infection was not associated with risk of HDP, but a slight decline in the risk of HDP was observed with later gestational week of infection. Among patients with asymptomatic or mild symptoms, SARS-CoV-2 in the first trimester conferred a higher risk of HDP compared to the third trimester (RR: 1.70; CI:0.77, 3.77), although estimates were imprecise. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy may increase the risk of HDP compared to infection later in pregnancy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced , Pre-Eclampsia , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Cohort Studies , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology
2.
Matern Child Health J ; 27(Suppl 1): 23-33, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37306823

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In recent decades, maternal mortality has increased across the U.S. Experiences of pregnant and postpartum people with Substance Use Disorder (SUD)-related deaths have not been previously evaluated in New Mexico. The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors related to substance use and explore substance use patterns among pregnancy-associated deaths in New Mexico from 2015 to 2019. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of pregnancy-associated deaths to assess the association between demographics, pregnancy factors, circumstances surrounding death, treatment of mental health conditions, and experiences with social stressors among Substance Use Disorder (SUD)-related and non-SUD-related deaths. We performed univariate analyses of risk factors using chi-square tests to assess the differences between SUD-related and non-SUD-related deaths. We also examined substance use at time of death. RESULTS: People with SUD-related deaths were more likely to die 43-365 days postpartum (81% vs. 45%, p-value = 0.002), have had a primary cause of death of mental health conditions (47% vs 10%, p < 0.001), have died of an overdose (41% vs. 8%, p-value = 0.002), have had experienced any social stressors (86% vs 30%, p < 0.001) compared to people with non-SUD-related deaths, and received treatment for SUD at any point before, during, or after pregnancy (49% vs. 2%, p < 0.001). The substances most used at time of death were amphetamines (70%), and most cases engaged in polysubstance use (63%). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Providers, health departments, and community organizations must prioritize supporting people using substances during and after pregnancy to prevent death and improve quality of life for pregnant and postpartum people.


Subject(s)
Maternal Mortality , Substance-Related Disorders , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , New Mexico/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Postpartum Period
3.
Psicol. soc. (Online) ; 33: e220944, 2021.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, Index Psychology - journals | ID: biblio-1250535

ABSTRACT

Resumo O objetivo neste artigo é aproximar a discussão sobre as questões de gênero que constituem o campo de saber da psicologia e as críticas dos saberes transfeministas às práticas e discursos normativos e patologizantes sobre as vivências de pessoas trans. Utiliza-se para tal análise as noções de cisgeneridade, como forma de nomear um lugar a partir do qual as identidades trans são enunciadas, e da cisnormatividade como dispositivo que regula e determina sentidos de coerência para os processos de constituição de gênero. Esses conceitos funcionam como operadores analíticos e políticos que fazem contraponto à naturalização da cisgeneridade como pressuposto fundante das verdades do gênero e dos modos de subjetivação. Problematiza-se, portanto, como a psicologia participa dos arranjos cisnormativos relacionados aos modos de reconhecimento das pessoas trans e às possibilidades de enunciação sobre suas vivências.


Resumen El objetivo de este artículo es aproximar la discusión sobre las cuestiones de género que constituyen el campo del saber de la psicología, así como las críticas de los saberes transfeministas, a las prácticas y discursos normativos y patologizantes sobre las vivencias de las personas trans. Para el análisis se utilizan las nociones de cisgeneridad como forma de nombrar un lugar a partir del cual las identidades trans son enunciadas, y de cisnormatividad como dispositivo que regula y pauta un sentido de coherencia a los procesos de constitución de género. Estos conceptos funcionan como operadores analíticos y políticos que generan un contrapunto a la naturalización de la cisgeneridad como presupuesto instituyente de las verdades del género y los modos de subjetivación. Se problematiza, por tanto, cómo la psicología participa de los acuerdos cisnormativos relacionados con los modos de reconocimiento de las personas trans, así como de las posibilidades de enunciación de sus vivencias.


Abstract This article aims to articulate the discussion about the gender issues that constitute psychology's knowledge field and the critiques of the trans-feminist knowledge to normative and pathological practices and discourses about the experiences of trans people. The notion of cisgenerity is used for such analysis as a way of naming a place from which trans identities are enunciated. Moreover, the notion of cis-normativity is used as an apparatus that regulates and determines meanings of coherence to the processes of gender constitution. These concepts function as analytical and political operators that make a counterpoint to the naturalization of cisgenerity as a founding presupposition of the truths of gender and the modes of subjectivation. Therefore, it is problematized how psychology participates in the cis-normative arrangements related to the modes of recognition of trans people and to the possibilities of enunciation about their experiences.


Subject(s)
Psychology , Sexism , Gender Identity , Transsexualism/psychology , Social Norms , Gender Binarism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...