The Role of Specialized Instruments for Advanced Endoscopic Resections in Gastrointestinal Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced endoscopic therapy techniques have been developed and have created alternative treatment options to surgical therapy for several gastrointestinal diseases. This work will focus on new endoscopic tools for special indications of advanced endoscopic resections (ER), especially endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), which were developed in our institution. This paper aims to analyze these specialized instruments and identify their status. METHODS: Initially, the technical process of ESD was analyzed, and the following limitations of the different endoscopic steps and the necessary manipulations were determined: the problem of traction-countertraction, the grasping force needed to pull on tissue, the instrument tip maneuverability, the limited angulation/triangulation, and the mobility of the scope and instruments. Five instruments developed by our team were used: the Endo-dissector, additional working channel system, external independent next-to-the-scope grasper, 3D overtube working station, and over-the-scope grasper. The instruments were used and applied according to their special functions in dry lab, experimental in vivo, and clinical conditions by the members of our team. RESULTS: The Endo-dissector has a two-fold function: (1) grasping submucosal tissue with enough precision and strength to pull it off the surrounding mucosa and muscle, avoiding damage during energy application and (2) effectively dividing tissue using monopolar energy. The AWC system quickly fulfills the lack of a second working channel as needed to complete the endoscopic task on demand. The EINTS grasper can deliver a serious grasping force, which may be necessary for a traction-countertraction situation during endoscopic resection for lifting a larger specimen. The 3D overtube multifunctional platform provides surgical-like work with bimanual-operated instruments at the tip of the scope, which allows for a coordinated approach during lesion treatment. The OTSG is a grasping tool with very special features for cleaning cavities with debris. CONCLUSIONS: The research and development of instruments with special features can solve unmet needs in advanced endoscopic procedures. The latter may help to increase indications for the endoscopic resections of gut lesions in the future.

Quality of life in benign colorectal disease-a review of the assessment with the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) is an instrument for the assessment of quality of life (QOL) in diseases of the upper and lower GI tract, which is validated in several languages around the world. The purpose of this literature review is the assessment of the GIQLI in patients with benign colorectal diseases. Reports on GIQLI data are collected from several institutions, countries, and different cultures which allows for comparisons, which are lacking in literature. METHODS: The GIQL Index uses 36 items around 5 dimensions (gastrointestinal symptoms (19 items), emotional dimension (5 items), physical dimension (7 items), social dimension (4 items), and therapeutic influences (1 item). The literature search was performed on the GIQLI and colorectal disease, using reports in PubMed. Data are presented descriptively as GIQL Index points as well as a reduction from 100% maximum possible index points (max 144 index points = highest quality of life). RESULTS: The GIQLI was found in 122 reports concerning benign colorectal diseases, of which 27 were finally selected for detailed analysis. From these 27 studies, information on 5664 patients (4046 female versus 1178 male) was recorded and summarized. The median age was 52 years (range 29-74.7). The median GIQLI of all studies concerning benign colorectal disease was 88 index points (range 56.2-113). Benign colorectal disease causes a severe reduction in QOL for patients down to 61% of the maximum. CONCLUSIONS: Benign colorectal diseases cause substantial reductions in the patient's QOL, well documented by GIQLI, which allows a comparison QOL with other published cohorts.

New Concept of External and Independent Next-to-the-Scope Intraluminal Grasping Device (EINTS).

Background: Interventional endoscopic procedures require complex manipulations and precise maneuvering of end-effectors. One focus in research on improved endoscopic instrument function was based on surgical experience to gain additional traction. The idea has emerged using assisting instruments by applying external tools next-to-the endoscope to follow surgical concepts. The aim of this study is the assessment of flexible endoscopic grasping instruments regarding their function and working-radius introducing the concept of an intraluminal "next-to the-scope" endoscopic grasper. Methods: In this study endoscopic graspers are evaluated (1:through-the-scope-grasper, TTSG; 2:additional-working-channel-system AWC-S;3:external-independent-next-to-the-scope-grasper EINTS-G) regarding their working-radius, grasping abilities, maneuverability and the ability to expose tissue with varying angulation. Results: The working radius of the tools attached or within the endoscope (TTS-G and AWC-S) benefit from the steering abilities of the scope reaching 180-210 degrees in retroflexion; EINTS-G is limited to 110-degrees. The robust EINTS-grasper has the advantage of stronger grip for grasping and pulling force, which enables manipulation of larger objects. The independent maneuverability during ESD-dissection provides better tissue-exposure by changing the traction-angulation. Conclusion: The working radius of tools attached to the endoscope benefit from scope- steering. The EINTS-grasper has the advantage of stronger grasping force and pulling within the GI-tract and independent maneuverability enables improved tissue-exposure. WC200.

Innovations in GI-endoscopy.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy covers both diagnosis and therapy. Due to its diagnostic accuracy and minimal invasiveness, several innovations have been made within the last years including artificial intelligence and endoscopic tumor resection. The present review highlights some of these innovation. In addition, a special focus is set on the experience made by our own research group trying to combine the expertise of endoscopists/ physicians as well as engineers and computer scientists.

Results in Antireflux Surgery, an Analysis of Case-Controlled Cohorts versus Multicenter Studies and Meta-Analyses.

Introduction: With the advent of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and Toupet partial fundoplication have been very successful in the management of GERD. In the past 10 years, a number of very attractive new technologies have entered the market around therapeutic GERD-management such as Transoral Incisionless Gastroplication, other endoscopic plication techniques, and the implantation of the magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA). These new technologies are excessively promoted by the respective companies, propagating their techniques as causing fewer side effects. The purpose of this paper is an overview on the successrates of these differently used techniques and technologies and, in addition, different study-designs. Methods: A literature review was performed searching for publications on laparoscopic fundoplication (LF), Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF), and laparoscopic MSA. The reported classified were separated according to their design into (group 1) large case-controlled series or comparative studies (n 100 cases) from high-volume centers and into (group 2) trials between different technologies of antireflux procedures, multicenter-studies, and meta-analyses of GERD-trials. Results: In total, 4030 abstract were screened according to the selected key words. Following the section criteria, 19 publications were selected and analyzed. Regarding group 1 and LF (selected studies 2565 patients), the morbidity ranged from 2.0-4.8 % of cases. With a follow-up time of 36-222 months most of these patients were followed 5 years. In group 2, more than 150 studies and several multicenter-registries were summarized in these 9 selected publications. The overall follow-up periods were substantially shorter with a range of 7-48 months. Conclusions: It can be concluded that special efforts in patient management in high volume centers and a vast experience may substantially contribute to excellent results for several antireflux techniques, which may reach a level of quality above results of registries and meta-analyses.

Gastrointestinal Quality of Life in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) is a well-established instrument for the assessment of quality of life (QOL) in gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. The purpose of this literature review was to investigate QOL by means of GIQLI in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) prior to any interventional therapy. There are several reports on GIQLI data; however, comparisons from different countries and/or different GERD cohorts assessing the same disease have to date not been conducted. METHODS: The GIQLI uses 36 items around 5 dimensions (GI symptoms [19 items], emotional dimension [5 items], physical dimension [7 items], social dimension [4 items], and therapeutic influences [1 item]). A literature search was conducted on the application of GIQLI in GERD patients prior to interventional therapy using reports in PubMed. Data on the mean GIQLI as well as index data for the 5 dimensions as originally validated were extracted from the published patient cohorts. A comparison with the normal healthy control group from the original publication of the GIQLI validation conducted by Eypasch was performed. Data are presented descriptively as GIQLI points as well as a reduction from 100% maximum possible index points (max 144 index points = highest QOL). RESULTS: In total, 77 abstracts from studies using the GIQLI on patients with GERD were identified. After screening for content, 21 publications were considered for further analysis. Ten studies in GERD patients comprised complete calculations of all dimensions and were included in the analysis. Data from 1,682 study patients were evaluated with sample sizes ranging from 33 to 568 patients (median age of 789 females and 858 males: 51.8 years). The median overall GIQLI for the patient group was 91.7 (range 86-102.4), corresponding to 63.68% of the maximum GIQLI. The dimensions with the largest deviation from the respective maximum score were the physical dimension (55% of maximum) followed by the emotional dimension (60% of maximum). In summary, the GIQLI level in GERD cohorts was reduced to 55-75% of the maximum possible index. CONCLUSIONS: Severe GERD causes substantial reductions in the patient's QOL. The level of GIQLI can carry between different studied GERD cohorts from different departments and countries. GIQLI can be used as an established tool to assess the patient's condition in various dimensions.

Current Insights in the Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

The pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is multifactorial determined and remains a matter of discussions between the involved medical subspecialties, mainly gastroenterologists and gastrointestinal surgeons, but also ear-nose-and-throat colleagues and pulmonologists. The purpose of this manuscript is an overview on the different pathophysiologic components of GERD, their influence as well as a certain weighing of their involvement in the disease. The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) represents together with the muscles and ligamentous structures of the diaphragm at the esophageal hiatus the antireflux barrier between esophagus and stomach. The crucial factor in GERD is an increased amount of gastric contents refluxing into the esophagus above the physiologic level. This creates pathologic esophageal acid exposure (EAE) to the mucosa, which may lead to symptoms and damage. The underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms are anatomical components such as LES and diaphragm, and functional components such as LES-incompetence, transient LES relaxations, impaired esophageal motility, gastroduodenal dysfunctions and alterations of the refluxate such as duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux. The quantitative assessment of these components has been reported in a number of studies demonstrating the importance of LES-incompetence (incidence 80 %) and the role of hiatal hernia (incidence 80 %) in the severity of GERD indicated by excessive esophageal acid exposure and visible damage of the esophageal mucosa. All known pathophysiologic components of GERD can be investigated currently by diagnostic assessment, detecting a LES-incompetence or an increase in transient relaxations, detecting a hiatal hernia with increasing size, detecting increasing exposure to gastric contents in addition to other possible functional associated disorders such as an insufficient esophageal motility and or a delayed gastric emptying, which all can aggravate the disease and the patient's status.

Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease-which factors are important?

BACKGROUND: Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) shows a multifactorial background. Different anatomical and functional alterations can be determined such as weakness of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), changes in anatomy by a hiatal hernia (HH), an impaired esophageal motility (IEM), and/or an associated gastric motility problem with either duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux (DGER) or delayed gastric emptying (DGE). The purpose of this study is to assess a large GERD-patient population to quantitatively determine different pathophysiologic factors contributing to the disease. METHODS: For this analysis only patients with documented GERD (pathologic esophageal acid exposure) were selected from a prospectively maintained databank. Investigations: history and physical, body mass index, endoscopy, esophageal manometry, 24 h-pH-monitoring, 24 h-bilirbine-monitoring, radiographic-gastric-emptying or scintigraphy, gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI). RESULTS: In total, 728 patients (420 males; 308 females) were selected for this analysis. Mean age: 49.9 years; mean BMI: 27.2 kg/m2 (range, 20-45 kg/m2); mean GIQLI of 91 (range: 43-138; normal level: 121); no esophagitis: 30.6%; minor esophagitis (Savary-Miller type 1 or Los Angeles Grade A): 22.4%; esophagitis [2-4]/B-D: 36.2%; Barrett's esophagus 10%. Presence of pathophysiologic factors: HH 95.4%; LES-incompetence 88%, DGER 55%, obesity 25.6%, IEM 8.8%, DGE 6.8%. CONCLUSIONS: In our evaluation of GERD patients, the most important pathophysiologic components are anatomical alterations (HH), LES-incompetence and DGER.

Pneumatic balloon dilatation versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia: a failed attempt at meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The advent of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) shed some light on the role of the current standards in the treatment of idiopathic achalasia, namely endoscopic pneumatic dilatation (PD) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). We analyzed the quality of the current evidence comparing LHM and PD. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in Pubmed/Medline, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Cochrane for meta-analyses/systematic reviews comparing PD and LHM or open surgery, limited to English language full-text articles. After a detailed review of these meta-analyses, all studies included were analyzed further in depth with respect to treatment protocol, assessment of success, complications and sequelae such as gastroesophageal reflux (GER), as well as follow-up details. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials (RCT), 5 with LHM and 1 with open surgery, were found, published in 10 papers. In contrast to a rather homogeneous LHM technique, PD regimens as well as the clinical dysphagia scores were different in every RCT; most RCTs also showed methodological limitations. There were nine meta-analyses which included a variable number of these RCTs or other cohort studies. Meta-analyses between 2009 and 2013 favored surgery, while the 4 most recent ones reached divergent conclusions. The main difference might have been whether repeated dilatation was regarded as part of the PD protocol or as failure. CONCLUSIONS: The variability in PD techniques and in definition of clinical success utilized in the achalasia RCTs on PD versus LHM render the conclusions of meta-analyses unreliable. Further randomized studies should be based on uniform criteria; in the meantime, publication of even more meta-analyses should be avoided.

Sleeve gastrectomy for treatment of delayed gastric emptying-indications, technique, and results.

INTRODUCTION: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) can be caused by gastric motility disorders such as gastroparesis with idiopathic background, diabetic neuropathy, or postsurgical nerve damage. Currently, a variety of endoscopic and surgical treatment options are available. We noted clinical improvement of gastric emptying with reduction of the gastric fundus following both fundoplication and fundectomy. As a consequence, we explored the effect of sleeve gastrectomy on gastric emptying. The focus of this paper is to investigate the role of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in the treatment of gastroparesis. METHODS: Patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroparesis received diagnostic work-up (gastric emptying scintigraphy and/or Radiographic Barium-Sandwich Emptying studies). Patients with fundic emptying problems and moderate gastric dilation were selected for a LSG. All perioperative parameters were documented regarding patients characteristics, complications, and outcomes expressed as symptoms and quality of life (GIQLI gastrointestinal quality of life index). Assessment of DGE: Barium Emptying Radigraphy Index (BERI) 0-5. RESULTS: From 122 patients with gastroparesis, 19 patients were selected for LSG (mean age 54 years (23-68); 10 males/9 females. Morbidity 2/19; no mortality; follow-up mean 24 months (12-60); preop/postop: BERI: 2, 31/1, 27 (p < 0.01); we noted significant improvement of the quality of life (preoperative GIQLI 78 (44-89)) to postoperative values of 114 (range 87-120) (p < 0.0001). Preoperative median BMI of these 19 patients was 24 [1-10], which was not significantly changed in the 15 patients at > 1 year follow-up with 23 [1-8]. Postoperative recurrence of DGE occurred in 3 patients who were reoperated after >1 year follow-up. CONCLUSION: LSG is a potential surgical treatment option for selected patients with gastroparesis and fundic emptying problems.

Transanal hybrid colon resection: techniques and outcomes for benign colorectal diseases.

BACKGROUND: Transanal hybrid rectal and colon resection have been introduced in recent years at dedicated surgical centers. The anus is used as a natural orifice for large size access. The use of transanal hybrid colectomy techniques is still in its infancy with outcomes and unique complications being identified. The purpose of this work is the evaluation of outcomes for transanal hybrid colon resections (ta-CR), including intra operative and postoperative complications, results, and advantages. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was analyzed. Inclusion criteria were any patient who underwent ta-CR for rectal prolapse, slow transit, obstructive defaecation, and chronic sigmoid diverticulitis. Patients were excluded from ta-CR if BMI > 30, major previous abdominal surgery, or presence of a large inflammatory mass in diverticulitis. Transanal access was used for all operative steps requiring access of more than 5 mm, such as staplers, large graspers, and specimen retrieval. Data acquisition and analysis was performed for operative time, complications, and postoperative quality of life. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2017, 82 patients underwent ta-CR [33 males, 49 females, median age 58 (24-80)]. Transanal-subtotal colectomy and ta-CR for constipation was performed in 12 patients; ta-CR and rectopexy in 31, and ta-CR for diverticulitis was performed in 39 patients. Conversion to traditional approach was required in 3 cases (3.6%). Intraoperative complication included 1 rectal tear requiring intervention. Post-op complications included 3 leaks requiring laparoscopic and 1 open revision, the latter developed wound infection and an incisional hernia. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) improved significantly from preoperative 89 to postoperative 119 (p < 0.001). No patients with ta-CR without open revision developed a hernia post-op with median 18 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ta-CR is a safe and effective NOTES Hybrid technique for colorectal procedures in selected patients with benign colon disorders. GIQLI shows improvement and this technique can have the potential in preventing wound and hernia complications.

Paraesophageal hernia repair: a curative consideration for chronic anemia?

INTRODUCTION: Chronic anemia is a common, coinciding or presenting diagnosis in patients with paraesophageal hernia (PEH). Presence of endoscopically identified ulcerations frequently prompts surgical consultation in the otherwise asymptomatic patient with anemia. Rates of anemia resolution following paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR) often exceed the prevalence of such lesions in the study population. A defined algorithm remains elusive. This study aims to characterize resolution of anemia after PEHR with respect to endoscopic diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients with PEH and anemia undergoing PEHR from 2007 to 2018 was performed. Anemia was determined by preoperative labs: Hgb < 12 mg/dl in females, Hgb < 13 mg/dl in males, or patients with ongoing iron supplementation. Improvement of post-operative anemia was assessed by post-operative hemoglobin values and continued necessity of iron supplementation. RESULTS: Among 56 identified patients, 45 were female (80.4%). Forty patients (71.4%) were anemic by hemoglobin value, 16 patients (28.6%) required iron supplementation. Mean age was 65.1 years, with mean BMI of 27.7 kg/m2. One case was a Type IV PEH and the rest Type III. 32 (64.0%) had potential source of anemia: 16 (32.0%) Cameron lesions, 6 (12.0%) gastric ulcers, 12 (24.0%) gastritis. 10 (20.0%) had esophagitis and 4 (8%) Barrett's esophagus. 18 (36%) PEH patients had normal preoperative EGD. Median follow-up was 160 days. Anemia resolution occurred in 46.4% of patients. Of the 16 patients with pre-procedure Cameron lesions, 10 (63%) had resolution of anemia. Patients with esophagitis did not achieve resolution. 72.2% (13/18) of patients with no lesions on EGD had anemia resolution (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients with PEH and identifiable ulcerations showed 50% resolution of anemia after hernia repair. Patients without identifiable lesions on endoscopy demonstrated statistically significant resolution of anemia in 72.2% of cases. Anemia associated with PEH adds an indication for surgical repair with curative intent.

Clinical Presentation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Prospective Study on Symptom Diversity and Modification of Questionnaire Application.

INTRODUCTION: Symptoms occurring in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) such as heartburn, regurgitation, thoracic pain, epigastric pain, respiratory symptoms, and others can show a broad overlap with symptoms from other foregut disorders. The goal of this study is the accurate assessment of symptom presentation in GERD. METHODS: Patients with foregut symptoms were investigated for symptoms as well as endoscopy and gastrointestinal-functional studies for presence of GERD and symptom evaluation by standardized questionnaire. Questionnaire included a graded evaluation of foregut symptoms documenting severity and frequency of each symptom. The three types of questionnaires include study nurse solicitated, self-reported, and free-form self-reported by the patient. RESULTS: For this analysis, 1,031 GERD patients (572 males and 459 females) were enrolled. Heartburn was the most frequently reported chief complaint, seen in 61% of patients. Heartburn and regurgitation are the most common (82.4/58.8%, respectively) in overall symptom prevalence. With regard to modification in questionnaire technique, if patients fill in responses without prompting, there is a trend toward more frequent documentation of respiratory symptoms (up to 54.5% [p < 0.01]), fullness (up to 93.9%), and gas-related symptoms (p < 0.001). Self-reported symptoms are more diverse (e.g., throat-burning [12%], mouth-burning [9%], globus [6%], dyspnea [9%], and fatigue [7%]). CONCLUSIONS: GERD symptoms are commonly heartburn and regurgitation, but overall symptom profile for patients may change depending on the type of questionnaire.

Magnetic sphincter augmentation: a viable rescue therapy for symptomatic reflux following bariatric surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) are commonly performed bariatric procedures in obesity management. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in this population has reported rates of 23-100%. GERD after LSG has been noted with recent studies demonstrating de novo reflux or symptom exacerbation despite weight loss. Fundoplication is not an option, and medically refractory GERD after LSG is usually treated with conversion to RYGB. GERD post-RYGB is a unique entity, and management poses a clinical and technical challenge. We evaluate safety and effectiveness of magnetic sphincter augmentation after bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed identifying patients that underwent LINX placement for refractory GERD after LSG, LRYGB, or duodenal switch across three institutions. Outcomes included complications, length of stay, PPI use, GERD-HRQL scores, and patient overall satisfaction. RESULTS: From March 2014 through June 2018, 13 identified patients underwent LINX placement after bariatric surgery: 8 LSG, 4 LRYGB, and 1 duodenal switch. The patients were 77% female, with mean age 43 and average BMI 30.1. Average pre-operative DeMeester score was 24.8. Pre-operatively, 5 patients were on daily PPI, 6 on BID PPI, and 1 on PPI + H2 blocker. We noted decreased medication usage post-operatively, with 4 patients taking daily PPI, and 9 off medication completely. A GERD-HRQL score was obtained pre- and post-operatively in 6 patients with average reduction from 25 to 8.5 (p value 0.002). Two patients experienced complications requiring endoscopic dilation after LINX placement. 100% of patients reported overall satisfaction post procedure. CONCLUSION: LINX placement is a safe, effective treatment option for surgical management of refractory GERD after bariatric surgery. It can relieve symptoms and obviate the requirement of high-dose medical management. Magnetic lower esophageal sphincter augmentation should be another tool in the surgeon's toolbox for managing reflux after bariatric surgery in select patients.

Do patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and somatoform tendencies benefit from antireflux surgery?

BACKGROUND: The clinical presentation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) shows a large symptom variation also in different intensities among patients. As several studies have shown, there is a large overlap in the symptomatic spectrum between proven GERD and other disorders such as dyspepsia, functional heartburn and/or somatoform disorders. AIM: To prospectively evaluate the GERD patients with and without somatoform disorders before and after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. METHODS: In a tertiary referral center for foregut surgery over a period of 3 years patients with GERD, qualifying for the indication of laparoscopic antireflux surgery, were investigated prospectively regarding their symptomatic spectrum in order to identify GERD and associated somatoform disorders. Assessment of symptoms was performed by an instrument for the evaluation of somatoform disorders [Somatoform Symptom Index (SSI) > 17]. Quality of life was evaluated by Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). RESULTS: In 123 patients an indication for laparoscopic antireflux surgery was established and in 43 patients further medical therapy was suggested. The portion of somatoform tendencies in the total patient population was 20.48% (34 patients). Patients with a positive SSI had a preoperative GIQLI of 77 (32-111). Patients with a normal SSI had a GIQLI of 105 (29-140) (P < 0.0001). In patients with GERD the quality of life could be normalized from preoperative reduced values of GIQLI 102 (47-140) to postoperative values of 117 (44-144). In patients with GERD and somatoform disorders, the GIQLI was improved from preoperative GIQLI 75 (47-111) to postoperative 95 (44-122) (P < 0.0043). CONCLUSION: Patients with GERD and associated somatoform disorders have significantly worse levels of quality of life. The latter patients can also benefit from laparoscopic fundoplication, however they will not reach a normal level.

[Interpretation und performance of high-resolution esophageal manometry: Recommendations of the German Association of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (DGNM) and the German Association of Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS)]. / Interpretation und Durchführung der hochauflösenden Ösophagusmanometrie: Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurogastroenterologie und Motilität (DGNM) sowie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselerkrankungen (DGVS).

Esophageal manometry provides a detailed evaluation of esophageal contractility and, therefore, represents the reference method for diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. Significance and clinical relevance have been further increased by implementation of high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), which reveals the functional anatomy of the esophagus in a visually-intuitive manner. The current 3 rd version of the international Chicago Classification (CC v3.0) gives standardized recommendations on performance and interpretation of HRM and serves as the basis for much of this expert consensus document. However, CC v3.0 gives only limited information with regards to the function of the lower and upper esophageal sphincters, the use of adjunctive tests including solid test meals and long-term ambulatory HRM measurements. In this expert consensus, we describe how to perform and interpret HRM on the basis of the CC v3.0 with additional recommendations based on the results of recent, high-quality clinical studies concerning the use of this technology to assess the causes of esophageal symptoms in a variety of clinical scenarios.

The RENAISSANCE (AIO-FLOT5) trial: effect of chemotherapy alone vs. chemotherapy followed by surgical resection on survival and quality of life in patients with limited-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction - a phase III trial of the German AIO/CAO-V/CAOGI.

BACKGROUND: Historical data indicate that surgical resection may benefit select patients with metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. However, randomized clinical trials are lacking. The current RENAISSANCE trial addresses the potential benefits of surgical intervention in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer with limited metastases. METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, investigator-initiated phase III trial. Previously untreated patients with limited metastatic stage (retroperitoneal lymph node metastases only or a maximum of one incurable organ site that is potentially resectable or locally controllable with or without retroperitoneal lymph nodes) receive 4 cycles of FLOT chemotherapy alone or with trastuzumab if Her2+. Patients without disease progression after 4 cycles are randomized 1:1 to receive additional chemotherapy cycles or surgical resection of primary and metastases followed by subsequent chemotherapy. 271 patients are to be allocated to the trial, of which at least 176 patients will proceed to randomization. The primary endpoint is overall survival; main secondary endpoints are quality of life assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire, progression free survival and surgical morbidity and mortality. Recruitment has already started; currently (Feb 2017) 22 patients have been enrolled. DISCUSSION: If the RENAISSANCE concept proves to be effective, this could potentially lead to a new standard of therapy. On the contrary, if the outcome is negative, patients with gastric or GEJ cancer and metastases will no longer be considered candidates for surgical intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The article reports of a health care intervention on human participants and is registered on October 12, 2015 under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02578368 ; EudraCT: 2014-002665-30.

The Endoscopic Treatment of Iatrogenic Gastrointestinal Perforation.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforation is a life-threatening complication that arises very rarely in routine endoscopic procedures, with an incidence of 0.03-0.8%. It is more likely in highly complex and invasive therapeutic interventions. In certain situations, endoscopic closure of the perforation and treatment with antibiotics can obviate the need for emergency surgical repair. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent articles retrieved by a selective literature search in PubMed and on a relevant position paper. RESULTS: Existing clinical studies of treatment for iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforation are mainly retrospective and uncontrolled. No randomized and controlled trials have been performed to date. If the perforation is discovered soon after it arises, endoscopic treatment can be considered. Gastrointestinal perforations that are less than 30 mm in size can be closed with a clip. In the esophagus, expanding metal stents can be used as well. Clip application is successful in 80-100% of cases of gastrointestinal perforation, and the perforation remains permanently closed in 60-100% of cases. Reports on the endoscopic treatment of esophageal perforation show mixed results, with closure rates of roughly 90% and clinical success rates of roughly 80%. If endoscopic treatment is not possible, timely laparoscopic or open surgical repair is needed. CONCLUSION: The endoscopic treatment of iatrogenic perforations is safe and reliable. Success depends on early detection, adequate endoscopic closure with properly mastered technique, and the early initiation of concomitant antibiotic treatment, which must be continued for a full course. Most patients who are treated in this way do not need emergency surgery.