ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: ⢠To assess, in a risk/benefit analysis, the additional risk for complications and benefits of extending the indications and anatomical limits of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: ⢠In total, 971 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from 2003-2007. ⢠Before 1 February 2005, patients with a nomogram probability of lymph node invasion (LNI) <2% did not undergo PLND (No PLND group), whereas those with a LNI ≥ 2% had a PLND limited to the external iliac nodal group (limited PLND group). ⢠After 1 February 2005, all patients underwent a standard PLND including the external iliac, hypogastric and obturator fossa nodal groups (standard PLND group). ⢠The risk parameters were PLND-related complications and operating time. Complications were graded using a modified Clavien classification. The benefit was the detection of nodal metastases. RESULTS: ⢠In the subgroup of patients with a LNI ≥ 2%, standard PLND was a superior operation than the limited PLND in detecting nodal metastases (14.3% vs 4.5%, respectively; P = 0.003). ⢠The risk/benefit of standard vs limited PLND would be one additional grade 3 complication per 20 additional patients with nodal metastases. In the subgroup of patients with LNI <2%, three patients (1.0%) had positive nodes after a standard PLND. ⢠The risk/benefit of standard PLND vs no PLND would be one additional grade 3 complication per three or four additional patients with nodal metastasis. The no PLND group was associated with the lowest risk of grade 1, 2 and 3 complications compared to either the limited or standard PLND groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ⢠In patients with LNI ≥ 2%, standard PLND detects more nodal metastasis. PLND is associated with higher but non-prohibitive complications rate. ⢠The present study found no evidence that the incidence of complications would be reduced by a limited PLND.
