Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
N Am Spine Soc J ; 7: 100075, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35141640

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the utility of patient-specific instruments (PSI) has been well established for complex osteotomies in orthopedic surgery, it is yet to be comparatively analyzed for complex spinal deformity correction, such as pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). METHODS: Six thoracolumbar human cadavers were used to perform nine PSOs using the free-hand (FH) technique and nine with PSI (in total 18 PSOs). Osteotomy planes were planned on the basis of preoperative computed tomography (CT). A closing-wedge angle of 30° was targeted for each PSO. Postoperative CT scans were obtained to measure segmental lordosis correction and the deviation from the planned 30° correction as well as the osseous gap of posterior elements. RESULTS: The time required to perform a PSO was 18:22 (range 10:22-26:38) min and 14:14 (range 10:13-22:16) min in the PSI and FH groups, respectively (p = 0.489). The PSI group had a significantly higher lordosis gain (29°, range 23-31° vs. 21°, range 13-34°; p = 0.015). The lordosis gain was significantly more accurate with PSI (deviation angle: 1°; range 0-7°) than with the FH technique (9°; range 4-17°; p = 0.003). PSI achieved a significantly smaller residual osseous gap of the posterior elements (5 mm; range 0-9 mm) than the FH group (11 mm; range 3-27 mm; p = 0.043).With PSI, an angular difference of 3° (range 1-12°), a translational offset of 1 (range 0-6) mm at the level of the lamina, and a vertebral body entry point deviation of 1 (range 0-4) mm was achieved in the osteotomies. CONCLUSIONS: PSI-guided PSO can be a more feasible and accurate approach in achieving a planned lordosis angle than the traditional FH technique in a cadaver model. This approach further reduced osseous gaps, potentially promoting higher fusion rates in vivo.

2.
Am J Phys Anthropol ; 169(2): 279-286, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30927271

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Estimating the sex of decomposed corpses and skeletal remains of unknown individuals is one of the first steps in the identification process in forensic contexts. Although various studies have considered the femur for sex estimation, the focus has primarily been on a specific single or a handful of measurements rather than the entire shape of the bone. In this article, we use statistical shape modeling (SSM) for sex estimation. We hypothesize that the accuracy of sex estimation will be improved by using the entire shape. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this study, we acquired a total of 61 femora from routine postmortem CT scans at the Institute for Forensic Medicine of the University of Zurich. The femora were extracted using segmentation technique. After building a SSM, we used the linear regression and nonlinear support vector machine technique for classification. RESULTS: Using linear logistic regression and only the first principal component of the SSM, 76% of the femora were correctly classified by sex. Using the first five principal components, this value could be increased to 80%. Using nonlinear support vector machines and the first 20 principal components increased the rate of correctly classified femora to 87%. DISCUSSION: Despite some limitations, the results obtained by using SSM for sex estimation in femur were promising and confirm the findings of other studies. Sex estimation accuracy, however, is not significantly improved over single or multiple linear measurements. Further research might improve the sex determination process in forensic anthropology by using SSM.


Subject(s)
Femur , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Models, Statistical , Sex Determination by Skeleton/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Anthropology, Physical , Female , Femur/anatomy & histology , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male
3.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 19(1): 403, 2018 11 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30454041

ABSTRACT

Following publication of the original article [1], the author pointed out that the references were numbered incorrectly. This error was introduced during the production process. The original article has been corrected.

4.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 19(1): 374, 2018 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30322393

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Opening-wedge osteotomies of the distal radius, performed with three-dimensional printed patient-specific instruments, are a promising technique for accurate correction of malunions. Nevertheless, reports of residual malalignments and discrepancies in the plate and screw position from the planned fixation exist. Consequently, we developed a patient-specific ramp-guide technique, combining navigation of plate positioning, osteotomy cutting, and reduction. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of navigation of three-dimensional planned opening-wedge osteotomies, using a ramp-guide, over state-of-the-art guide techniques relying solely on pre-drilled holes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on opening-wedge osteotomies of the distal radius, performed between May 2016 and April 2017, with patient-specific instruments. Eight patients were identified in which a ramp-guide for the distal plate fixation was used. We compared the reduction accuracy with a control group of seven patients, where the reduction was performed with pre-drilled screw holes placed with the patient-specific instruments. The navigation accuracy was assessed by comparing the preoperative plans with the postoperative segmented, computed tomography scans. The accuracy was expressed using a 3D angle and in measurements of all six degrees of freedom (3 translations, 3 rotations), with respect to an anatomical coordinate system. RESULTS: The duration of the surgery of the ramp-guide group was significantly shorter compared to the control group. Significantly less rotational and translational residual malalignment error was observed in the open-wedged osteotomies, where patient-specific instruments with ramp-guides were used. On average, a residual rotational malalignment error of 2.0° (± 2.2°) and a translational malalignment error of 0.6 mm (± 0.2 mm) was observed in the ramp-guide group, as compared to the 4.2° (± 15.0°) and 1.0 mm (± 0.4 mm) error in the control group. The used plate was not significantly positioned more accurately, but significantly fewer screws (15.6%) were misaligned in the distal fragment compared to the control group (51.9%). CONCLUSION: The use of the presented ramp-guide technique in opening-wedge osteotomies is improving reduction accuracy, screw position, and surgical duration, compared to the existing patient-specific instrument based navigation methods.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation/methods , Fractures, Malunited/surgery , Osteotomy/instrumentation , Radius Fractures/surgery , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bone Plates , Bone Screws , Case-Control Studies , Child , Fracture Fixation/instrumentation , Fractures, Malunited/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Malunited/etiology , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Osteotomy/methods , Patient Care Planning , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Radius Fractures/complications , Radius Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg ; 13(6): 827-836, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29623539

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: For guidance of orthopedic surgery, the registration of preoperative images and corresponding surgical plans with the surgical setting can be of great value. Ultrasound (US) is an ideal modality for surgical guidance, as it is non-ionizing, real time, easy to use, and requires minimal (magnetic/radiation) safety limitations. By extracting bone surfaces from 3D freehand US and registering these to preoperative bone models, complementary information from these modalities can be fused and presented in the surgical realm. METHODS: A partial bone surface is extracted from US using phase symmetry and a factor graph-based approach. This is registered to the detailed 3D bone model, conventionally generated for preoperative planning, based on a proposed multi-initialization and surface-based scheme robust to partial surfaces. RESULTS: 36 forearm US volumes acquired using a tracked US probe were independently registered to a 3D model of the radius, manually extracted from MRI. Given intraoperative time restrictions, a computationally efficient algorithm was determined based on a comparison of different approaches. For all 36 registrations, a mean (± SD) point-to-point surface distance of [Formula: see text] was obtained from manual gold standard US bone annotations (not used during the registration) to the 3D bone model. CONCLUSIONS: A registration framework based on the bone surface extraction from 3D freehand US and a subsequent fast, automatic surface alignment robust to single-sided view and large false-positive rates from US was shown to achieve registration accuracy feasible for practical orthopedic scenarios and a qualitative outcome indicating good visual image alignment.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Radius/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Forearm , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Radius/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...