ABSTRACT
La pronación consciente es una de las herramientas utilizadas para reducir los ingresos a terapia intensiva (UTI) en la neumonía por COVID-19 con hipoxemia. Algunos pacientes no toleran estar en posición prono (intolerantes) y algunos que lo toleran no responden mejorando la saturación o su PO2. Presentamos una serie de 34 pacientes sometidos a pronación consciente; fueron tolerantes 18 (52,9%). Nueve pacientes pasaron a UTI (26,4%): 7 intolerantes (43,7%) y 2 tolerantes (11,1%) (p=0.038). No hallamos diferencias en la necesidad de ventilación mecánica y mortalidad entre tolerantes e intolerantes. De los 18 tolerantes se clasificó como respondedores a 10 pacientes (55,5%). No hubo diferencia estadísticamente significativa en los pases a UTI entre los respondedores y no respondedores. La pronación consciente es una herramienta factible en el paciente con neumonía por COVID-19 y nos permitió predecir el requerimiento de terapia intensiva entre aquellos intolerantes al método.
The prone positioning (PP) in awake patients is one of the tools to reduce the number of admissions to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in cases of Covid-19 hipoxemic pneumonia. Some patients do not tolerate PP (intolerants) and others that tolerate it do not respond with improvement of PO2 or oxygen saturation. We present here a series of 34 patients who underwent PP. Eighteen of them tolerated PP (52,9%). Nine patients (26,4%) were admitted to ICU: 7 who had not tolerated PP (43,7%) and 2 who had tolerated PP (11,1%) (p= 0.038). We did not find differences in the need for mechanical ventilation and mortality between patients who tolerated and who did not tolerate PP. From those 18 who tolerated PP, 10 were classified as responders (55,5%). We did not find any significant statistical differences for admission to ICU between responders and non-responders. PP in awake patients is a feasible tool in cases of COVID-19 Pneumonia, and it allowed us to predict the requirements of ICU between those who were not tolerant to the method
Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis , COVID-19/therapy , Intensive Care Units , Prone PositionABSTRACT
Vaccination of dogs, the domestic reservoir of Leishmania infantum, is the best method for controlling zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis. This strategy would reduce the incidence of disease in both the canine and, indirectly, the human population. Different vaccination approaches have been investigated against canine leishmaniasis (CaL) but to date there is only one licensed vaccine against this disease in dogs, in Brazil. DNA immunization is a promising method for inducing both humoral and cellular immune responses against this parasitic disease. Here, we report the results of a multiantigenic plasmid DNA vaccine encoding KMPII, TRYP, LACK and GP63 L. infantum antigens against experimentally induced CaL. Twelve dogs were randomly assigned to two groups receiving, at a 15 days interval, either four doses of plasmid DNA or similar injections of PBS. After vaccination, dogs were intravenously challenged with 5 x 10(7) promastigotes of L. infantum. The vaccine showed to be safe and well-tolerated. Neither cellular immune response nor antibodies directed against whole Leishmania antigen were detected after immunization in vaccinated dogs, although anti-LACK-specific antibodies were sporadically detected in two vaccinated dogs before challenge, thus suggesting that antigens were indeed expressed. A delay in the development of detectable specific immune response and parasite multiplication in vaccinated dogs was observed after challenge. Nevertheless, the multiantigenic Leishmania DNA vaccine was unable to induce protection against parasite dissemination or disease. This study emphasizes the need to strengthen DNA vaccines in order to obtain effective immune responses in models other than the murine.