Subject(s)
Contraceptives, Oral, Combined/pharmacology , Contraceptives, Oral/pharmacology , Erythrocytes/drug effects , Hematocrit , Contraceptives, Oral, Combined/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Erythrocyte Count , Female , Humans , Intrauterine Devices , Mestranol/administration & dosage , Mestranol/pharmacology , Norethynodrel/administration & dosage , Norethynodrel/pharmacology , Pregnancy , Random Allocation , Vaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies/pharmacologyABSTRACT
An analysis of 223 children born between 1961 and 1965 to 5,465 women in a controlled experiment at the University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, regarding the use of oral and nonoral contraceptives, failed to reveal any statistical differences in birth weight and physical abnormalities between the two contraceptive groups. The mean birth weight for the oral group was 7 pounds, 4.1 ounces, whereas for the nonoral group it was 7 pounds, 5.4 ounces. Abnormal physical findings were 10.7% for the oral group and 16.7% for the nonoral group. A comparison is also made between the two groups with respect to incidence of abnormalities by socioeconomic class and by sex of the child, as well as by the number of pregnancies and age of the mother. No significant differences were noted between the groups as an indication of the effect of oral contraceptives.
Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities/etiology , Contraceptives, Oral/adverse effects , Intrauterine Devices/adverse effects , Adult , Birth Weight , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , Socioeconomic FactorsSubject(s)
Contraceptive Devices, Female , Intelligence , Mestranol , Norethynodrel , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Contraceptive Devices, Female/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Mestranol/adverse effects , Norethynodrel/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Wechsler ScalesSubject(s)
Contraceptive Devices , Contraceptives, Oral/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Adult , Age Factors , Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Educational Status , Family Characteristics , Female , Genital Neoplasms, Female/chemically induced , Humans , Income , Mestranol/adverse effects , Methods , Norethynodrel/adverse effects , Occupations , Parity , Probability , Puerto Rico , Research Design , Statistics as Topic , Time FactorsABSTRACT
PIP: 9634 patients (21-39 years, with at least 1 normal pregnancy) with no previous experience with oral contraceptives or IUDs, seen at clinics in Rio Piedras, Caguas, and Ponce, Puerto Rico from July 1961 to October 1969 to study their changing patterns in cervical cytology were divided randomly into 2 groups, of which 4846 were given oral contraceptive, Enovid, and 4788 provided with a vaginal contraceptive excluding IUDs, and followed for a period of 6 months-8 years. Separate Pap smears were obtained at admittance to the study by an endocervical aspiration with the pipette and cervical sample with Ayre spatula scraped over the cervico-columnar junction. The cervix was diagrammed showing any erosion. Schiller tests were done. Possible presence of Trichomonas vaginalis was treated. Repeat smears were done at 3-month intervals. 2129 oral patients and 2249 nonoral patients experienced either regression or progression in cytological patterns throughout the 8 years of observation. The analysis is divided into 3 groups, irrespective of the time at which they were observed. Of the 2129 oral patients showing a first change, 55.5% progressed to a higher Pap class, 44.5% regressed to a lower Pap class. In the nonoral group, 55.2% progressed and 44.4% regressed. 1255 patients had a second change: in the oral group, 37.5% progressed, 62.5% regressed. In the nonoral group, 36.7% progressed, 63.3% regressed out of 1258 patients. 690 oral patients showed a third change: 46.1% progressed and 53.9% regressed. Of the 718 nonoral patients 47.1% progressed and 52.9% regressed. There was no significant difference in the pattern of progression and regression between oral and nonoral groups. Oral contraceptives do not aggravate the conditions which lead to development of premalignant lesions in the uterine cervix.^ieng
Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri/drug effects , Contraceptive Devices/adverse effects , Contraceptives, Oral/adverse effects , Precancerous Conditions/chemically induced , Precancerous Conditions/etiology , Adult , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Humans , Mestranol/adverse effects , Norethynodrel/adverse effects , Papanicolaou Test , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Time Factors , Vaginal SmearsABSTRACT
PIP: The effect of high-dose, long-term oral contraceptive use on thyroid function and thyroid disease was investigated. Between 1956 and 1962 there were 836 patients treated with Enovid. Initially doses of 10 mg were given, then 5 mg, and finally 2.5 mg. 53 patients used oral contraceptives continuously through a total of 8111 cycles with an average of 156 cycles and an average dose of 3.75 mg/day/cycle. These 53 women were studied for protein bound iodine (PBI), resin triiodothyronine (T3) uptake, total thyroxine (TT), free thyroxine level (FT), radioiodine uptake, and a thyroid scan. Fractional uptakes were done on some. The PBI, T3, TT, and FT tests were done at the Bio-Science Laboratories in California, the others at a local laboratory. Uptake values were abnormally low in 40% of patients. This finding had not been previously reported. Thyroid scannings for 48 patients showed 44 were normal. In 3 patients the thyroid appeared uniformly enlarged but this was not apparent on physical examination. A small cold area was noted in 1 thyroid. No nodule or other variation was found on physical examination. A combination of the PBI test and T3 would be most helpful in evaluating hypo or hyperthyroidism. In the presence of a nontoxic goiter the PBI would be normal or high and the T3 normal or low. Though individual tests showed alterations no definite e vidence of thyroid disease was found in the patients studied.^ieng