Banff 2022 Liver Group Meeting report: Monitoring long-term allograft health.

The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology met in September 2022. Participants included hepatologists, surgeons, pathologists, immunologists, and histocompatibility specialists. Presentations and discussions focused on the evaluation of long-term allograft health, including noninvasive and tissue monitoring, immunosuppression optimization, and long-term structural changes. Potential revision of the rejection classification scheme to better accommodate and communicate late T cell-mediated rejection patterns and related structural changes, such as nodular regenerative hyperplasia, were discussed. Improved stratification of long-term maintenance immunosuppression to match the heterogeneity of patient settings will be central to improving long-term patient survival. Such personalized therapeutics are in turn contingent on a better understanding and monitoring of allograft status within a rational decision-making approach, likely to be facilitated in implementation with emerging decision-support tools. Proposed revisions to rejection classification emerging from the meeting include the incorporation of interface hepatitis and fibrosis staging. These will be opened to online testing, modified accordingly, and subject to consensus discussion leading up to the next Banff conference.

Gene expression profiling and transplantation tolerance in the clinic.

Stable graft function in the absence of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy (IS) is observed in some kidney recipients and in approximately 20% of liver recipients. Identification of these "operationally tolerant" recipients would constitute a major achievement in that it would allow for the widespread application of IS minimization strategies in the clinic. The use of gene expression profiling has provided promising results in the characterization of tolerant transplant recipients. We review here the available information on the use of transcriptional biomarkers to identify transplantation tolerance in the clinic and discuss some of the limitations of such strategy.

CD8(+) T cells resistant to costimulatory blockade are controlled by an antagonist interleukin-15/Fc protein.

BACKGROUND: Although permanent engraftment is often achieved with new therapeutics, chronic rejection and graft failure still occur. As the importance of CD8(+) T cells in rejection processes has been underlined in various transplant models, and as interleukin (IL)-15 is involved in the activation of CD8(+) T cells, we hypothesize that CD8(+) T cell "escape" from costimulation blockade might be a IL-15/IL-15R dependent process. METHODS: In a murine islet allograft model employing a fully major histocompatibility complex-mismatched strain combination of Balb/c donors to CD4 C57BL/6 recipients, a monotherapy with the IL-15 antagonist, IL-15 mutant/Fcgamma2a, or the costimulatory blockade molecule, CTLA4/Fc, was used. In addition to monitoring graft survival, infiltration of alloreactive immune cells was analyzed by histology and immunohistochemistry, and alloimmune response of proliferative CD8(+) T cells was measured in vivo. RESULTS: Sixty percent of the recipients treated with CTLA4/Fc acutely rejected their islet allograft, comparable to untreated control animals (50% survival). In contrast, the IL-15 antagonist proved to be highly effective, with 100% of recipients accepting their allograft. Immunohistology study demonstrated a remarkable decrease of CD8(+) T-cell intragraft infiltration in IL-15 mutant/Fcgamma2a treated animals with well-preserved islet architecture and a reduced frequency of proliferating alloreactive CD8(+) T cells in comparison with that of untreated and CTLA4/Fc treated groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we determined the efficacy and potential therapeutic benefit of the IL-15 antagonist on CD4-independent CD8(+) T-cell responses to alloantigens. Targeting the IL-15/IL-15R pathway represents a potent strategy to prevent rejection driven by CD8(+) T cells resistant to costimulation blockade.