ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Duty hour restrictions have increased the role of simulation in surgical education. A simulation that recreates the unique visual, anatomic, and ergonomic challenges of anorectal surgery has yet to be described. The aim of this study was to develop a low-cost, low-fidelity anorectal surgery simulator and provide validity evidence for the model. METHODS: A novel, low-fidelity simulator was constructed, and anorectal surgery workshops were implemented for general surgery interns at a single institution. Face and content validity were assessed with separate questionnaires using a 5-point Likert scale. Participants performed a simulated hemorrhoid excision with longitudinal wound closure, and transverse wound closure. Time-to-task completion and quality of suturing/knot tying were evaluated by a blinded observer to assess construct validity. RESULTS: Material cost was US $11 per simulator. We recruited 20 first-year surgery residents (novices) and 4 practicing colorectal surgeons (experts), and conducted 3 workshops in 2014-2016. All face and content validity measures achieved a median score greater than 4 (range 4.0-5.0). Time-to-task completion was significantly lower in the expert cohort (hemorrhoid excision with longitudinal wound closure: 195 vs. 477 s and transverse closure: 79 vs. 192 s, p < 0.001 for both). Suturing and knot-tying scores were significantly higher in the expert cohort for both tasks (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Our low-fidelity, low-cost anorectal surgery model demonstrated evidence of face, content, and construct validity. We believe that this simulator could be a useful instrument in the education of junior surgical trainees and will allow residents to obtain proficiency in anorectal suturing tasks in conjunction with traditional surgical training.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic two-port totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective analysis from 2004 to 2013 of patients undergoing two-port TEP performed by a single surgeon at three surgical centers. RESULTS: 336 consecutive patients underwent two-port TEP repairing 478 hernias. 315 (93.8 %) patients were male and 21 (6.2 %) were female. Mean age ± SD was 47 ± 14 years and mean body mass index ± SD was 28.0 ± 4.7 kg/m(2). Indications for surgery included primary repair 303 (90.2 %), recurrence from open repair 28 (8.3 %), and incarcerated inguinal hernia 5 (1.5 %). 194 (57.7 %) cases were unilateral and 142 (42.3 %) were bilateral. Operative time ± SD was 38.7 ± 14.9 min for unilateral repair and 43.4 ± 17.6 min for bilateral repair. Two-port TEP was successful in 316 (94.0 %). 20 (6.0 %) cases required the addition of a third port. 2 (0.6 %) cases were converted to open repair. Mean follow-up time ± SD was 5.4 ± 2.7 years. Postoperative complications included urinary retention 5 (1.5 %), seroma 7 (2.1 %), hematoma 1 (0.3 %), surgical site infection 4 (1.2 %), and chronic inguinal pain 3 (0.9 %). 11 (2.3 %) hernias recurred. CONCLUSION: Two-port TEP appears to be a feasible, safe, and effective method for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and should be considered a viable, less invasive alternative to conventional three-port techniques.