Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Pediatr Surg ; 34(1): 102-106, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37591255

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Nonoperative management (NOM) for simple acute appendicitis (SAA) is an acceptable mode of treatment in healthy children. Previous studies of NOM routinely excluded young children (< 5 years); however, the effect of age on NOM failure has not been directly assessed. Efficiency of NOM in young adults is questionable. Therefore, adolescents may also be at greater risk of NOM failure. Our aim was to investigate the effect of age on NOM failure. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of children with SAA who received NOM between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2021, at our institution. NOM failure was defined by subsequent appendectomy. Age was assessed as a continuous variable, and we also compared different age subgroups. RESULTS: In this study, 151 children were included (60% male), mean age 11.2 ± 3.2 years (range: 5-17). Overall, 66 children (44%) failed NOM, 90% of them within the first year (median 7 weeks). Ten percent of the cohort were younger than 6 years of age and 33% of them failed NOM (p = 0.39). Per 1 year increase in age, the odds of NOM failure increased by 12% (p = 0.027). Children over 14 years of age had 2.46 times higher odds to fail NOM (p = 0.03). These higher odds remained after adjusting for appendiceal diameter and appendicolith. Linear regression showed a decrease by a factor of 12 at the time of NOM failure with every 1-year increase in age (ß = -12, p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: The risk of NOM failure in children increases with age; therefore, age should be considered when deciding on the optimal management of SAA, especially in adolescents. Effectiveness of NOM in children younger than 6 years is noninferior to older children and therefore should not be excluded.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis , Appendix , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Humans , Male , Female , Appendicitis/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Appendectomy , Acute Disease , Treatment Outcome
2.
Eur J Pediatr Surg ; 31(1): 95-101, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33080628

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: During the past decade, nonoperative management (NOM) for simple acute appendicitis (SAA) in children has been proven safe with noninferior complications rate. The aim of this study was to examine Alvarado score and pediatric appendicitis score (PAS) together with other factors in predicting failure of NOM in children presenting with SAA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged 5 to 18 years admitted to our department between 2017 and 2019 diagnosed with SAA were given a choice between surgical management and NOM. We divided the NOM patients into two groups: successful treatment and failed NOM, comparing their files for Alvarado score and PAS and other clinical and demographic factors, with a mean follow-up of 7 months. Failure was determined as need for appendectomy following conservative treatment due to any reason. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients answered criteria and chose NOM. Overall failure rate was 32.9%. We found no difference in the mean Alvarado score and PAS as well as in each component of both scores between success and failed NOM groups. However, when using the risk classification of the scores, we found a significant correlation between high-risk Alvarado score and failed NOM. After adjusting for age, gender, duration of symptoms, diagnosis of tip appendicitis, and presence of appendicolith, the odds of failure were four times higher among high-risk Alvarado group. CONCLUSION: Alvarado score of 7 or higher, older age, and diagnosis of an appendicolith on imaging are possible predictors for failure of NOM for SAA in children.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Appendicitis/drug therapy , Conservative Treatment/methods , Administration, Intravenous , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome
3.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 66(12): 1802-1807, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30451182

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A prospective cohort study investigating the effect of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) on the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD), in view of evidence that the vitreoretinal interface impacts the severity of the disease. METHODS: Treatment-naïve AMD eyes with (+) complete PVD and without (-) PVD on ultrasonography received three monthly and then pro re nata bevacizumab injections. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) on Snellen charts and optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings were recorded for 12 months. Secondary analysis included PVD definition and group allocation according to OCT baseline scan. RESULTS: Forty-one eyes of 34 patients met the inclusion criteria. At 12 months, median BCVA improved by 0.12 logMAR in the PVD+ group [interquartile range (IQR) -0.52, 0.03, P = 0.140] and remained the same in the PVD- group (IQR -0.12, 0.15, P = 0.643). Median central retinal thickness improved by 43.5 µm and 43 µm in the PVD+ (IQR -143, 3, P = 0.016) and PVD- group (IQR -90, -14, P = 0.008), respectively. All parameters were similar in the two groups at final follow up (P > 0.05). The secondary analysis included 32 eyes of 26 patients and showed no significant differences between the groups at the 12 months endpoint (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings show no significant impact of PVD as assessed by ultrasound or by OCT on visual and anatomical outcomes in exudative AMD treated with bevacizumab.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Vitreous Detachment/physiopathology , Wet Macular Degeneration/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Fluorescein Angiography , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Male , Prospective Studies , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Visual Acuity/physiology , Vitreous Detachment/diagnostic imaging , Wet Macular Degeneration/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...