ABSTRACT
This study aimed to better understand current clinical practice of rehabilitation professionals in Lima, Peru, and to explore the existence of and potential for interprofessional collaboration. A secondary purpose was to assess rehabilitation professionals' agreement with evidence-based stroke rehabilitation statements and confidence performing stroke rehabilitation tasks prior to and following an interprofessional stroke rehabilitation training. Current clinical practice for rehabilitation professionals in Peru differs from high-income counties like the United States, as physical therapists work with dysphagia and feeding, prosthetist orthotists serve a strictly technical role, and nurses have a limited role in rehabilitation. Additionally, while opportunity for future interprofessional collaboration within stroke rehabilitation exists, it appears to be discouraged by current health system policies. Pre- and post-training surveys were conducted with a convenience sample of 107 rehabilitation professionals in Peru. Survey response options included endorsement of professionals for rehabilitation tasks and a Likert scale of agreement and confidence. Training participants largely agreed with evidence-based stroke rehabilitation statements. Differences in opinion remained regarding the prevalence of dysphagia and optimal frequency of therapy post-stroke. Substantially increased agreement post-training was seen in favour of early initiation of stroke rehabilitation and ankle foot orthosis use. Participants were generally confident performing traditional profession-specific interventions and educating patients and families. Substantial increases were seen in respondents' confidence to safely and independently conduct bed to chair transfers and determine physiological stability. Identification of key differences in rehabilitation professionals' clinical practice in Peru is a first step toward strengthening the development of sustainable rehabilitation systems and interprofessional collaboration.
Subject(s)
Interprofessional Relations , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Stroke Rehabilitation/methods , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence , Cooperative Behavior , Deglutition Disorders/rehabilitation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Paralysis/rehabilitation , Peru , Professional RoleABSTRACT
In the original article some funding information was inadvertently omitted. The complete funding information is as follows.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess rehabilitation infrastructure in Peru in terms of the World Health Organization (WHO) health systems building blocks. DESIGN: Anonymous quantitative survey; questions were based on the WHO's Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care and rehabilitation professionals' input. SETTING: Large public hospitals and referral centers and an online survey platform. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of hospital personnel working in rehabilitation and neurology (N=239), recruited through existing contacts and professional societies. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were for 4 WHO domains: health workforce, health service delivery, essential medical products and technologies, and health information systems. RESULTS: Regarding the domain of health workforce, 47% of physical therapists, 50% of occupational therapists, and 22% of physiatrists never see inpatients. Few reported rehabilitative nurses (15%) or prosthetist/orthotists (14%) at their hospitals. Even at the largest hospitals, most reported ≤3 occupational therapists (54%) and speech-language pathologists (70%). At hospitals without speech-language pathologists, physical therapists (49%) or nobody (34%) perform speech-language pathology roles. At hospitals without occupational therapists, physical therapists most commonly (59%) perform occupational therapy tasks. Alternate prosthetist/orthotist task performers are occupational therapists (26%), physical therapists (19%), and physicians (16%). Forty-four percent reported interdisciplinary collaboration. Regarding the domain of health services, the most frequent inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation barriers were referral delays (50%) and distance/transportation (39%), respectively. Regarding the domain of health information systems, 28% reported rehabilitation service data collection. Regarding the domain of essential medical products and technologies, electrophysical agents (88%), gyms (81%), and electromyography (76%) were most common; thickened liquids (19%), swallow studies (24%), and cognitive training tools (28%) were least frequent. CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation emphasis is on outpatient services, and there are comparatively adequate numbers of physical therapists and physiatrists relative to rehabilitation personnel. Financial barriers seem low for accessing existing services. There appear to be shortages of inpatient rehabilitation, specialized services, and interdisciplinary collaboration. These may be addressed by redistributing personnel and investing in education and equipment for specialized services. Further examination of task sharing's role in Peru's rehabilitation services is necessary to evaluate its potential to address deficiencies.
Subject(s)
Allied Health Personnel/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Rehabilitation/organization & administration , Allied Health Personnel/standards , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Equipment and Supplies/standards , Equipment and Supplies/statistics & numerical data , Health Information Systems/statistics & numerical data , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Inpatients , Outpatients , Peru , Quality of Health Care/standards , Rehabilitation/standards , World Health OrganizationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess surgeons' access to and use of medical information, as well as their training and perceptions about evidence-based medicine (EBM), in order to identify priority areas for improvement. STUDY DESIGN: An anonymous survey conducted among surgeons from the USA, Ghana, Peru, and Thailand examined access to, and use and perception of, medical literature. RESULTS: Of 307 participants, 98% reported access to "OK" or "good" internet. Fifty-one percent reported that language was a barrier to accessing needed medical information; most frequently in Peru (73%) and Thailand (64%). Access to priced full-text journals was poorest in Peru, where 54% lacked access, followed by Ghana (42%) and Thailand (32%). US respondents scored highest on the EBM knowledge test (1.4, SD 0.8), followed by Thailand (1.3, SD 0.9), Ghana (1.1, SD 0.8), and Peru (0.9, SD 0.8) (p < 0.001). Adjusted analysis revealed Ghanaians and Peruvians spent 5% and 1% more on medical information, respectively, relative to country income, than persons from other countries (p < 0.01). After adjustment, employment in a large and/or urban hospital and history of EBM training were associated with better EBM test scores, while middle-income origin and public hospital employment were associated with worse scores (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Language, access to priced full-text journals, and training are significant barriers to surgeons' practice of EBM globally. The way forward involves collaboration among surgical societies, publishers, hospital employers, and international policymakers in providing surgeons from all country income levels with the access and training necessary to interpret and apply medical information.
Subject(s)
Access to Information , Attitude of Health Personnel , Evidence-Based Medicine/education , Surgeons/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ghana , Humans , Internet , Middle Aged , Perception , Peru , Surveys and Questionnaires , ThailandABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Evidence for the positive impact of quality improvement (QI) programs on morbidity, mortality, patient satisfaction, and cost is strong. Data regarding the status of QI programs in low- and middle-income countries, as well as in-depth examination of barriers and facilitators to their implementation, are limited. METHODS: This cross-sectional, descriptive study employed a mixed-methods design, including distribution of an anonymous quantitative survey and individual interviews with healthcare providers who participate in the care of the injured at ten large hospitals in Lima, Peru. RESULTS: Key areas identified for improvement in morbidity and mortality (M&M) conferences were the standardization of case selection, incorporation of evidence from the medical literature into case presentation and discussion, case documentation, and the development of a clear plan for case follow-up. The key barriers to QI program implementation were a lack of prioritization of QI, lack of sufficient human and administrative resources, lack of political support, and lack of education on QI practices. CONCLUSIONS: A national program that makes QI a required part of all health providers' professional training and responsibilities would effectively address a majority of identified barriers to QI programs in Peru. Specifically, the presence of basic QI elements, such as M&M conferences, should be required at hospitals that train pre-graduate physicians. Alternatively, short of this national-level organization, efforts that capitalize on local examples through apprenticeships between institutions or integration of QI into continuing medical education would be expected to build on the facilitators for QI programs that exist in Peru.
Subject(s)
Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Peru , Program DevelopmentABSTRACT
Pneumocephalus is a rare complication of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), but existing literature does not discuss pneumocephalus surrounding endoscopic food bolus retrieval. We present a death involving pneumocephalus complicating endoscopic food removal from the esophagus. A 40-year-old man presented with dysphagia and suprasternal discomfort 12 hours following chicken ingestion. On flexible endoscopy, chicken was visualized in the distal esophagus. After successful retrieval, a mucosal laceration was noted where the chicken had been lodged. He was unarousable following the procedure and was emergently transported to a hospital, where computed tomography scanning showed pneumocephalus. He was later declared brain dead. The case was referred for medicolegal autopsy. The brain was examined first, revealing rare air bubbles within meningeal vessels and numerous, diffuse petechiae-like hemorrhages within the brain parenchyma. The esophageal mucosa had focal discoloration and a partial thickness laceration; microscopic examination revealed eosinophilic esophagitis. Eosinophilic esophagitis is a known risk factor for food bolus impaction and should be suspected in such patients. Pneumocephalus is a rare possible complication of EGD for food bolus retrieval. In patients unresponsive after endoscopy, radiographic detection of potential pneumocephalus should be encouraged to enable timely therapy and improved outcomes, or to supplement autopsy in the event of patient death. Forensic pathologists should understand that pneumocephalus is a potential mechanism of injury/death in patients experiencing esophageal trauma, including injury incurred during EGD.