Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Audiol ; 49(2): 129-40, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20151887

ABSTRACT

Efforts to correlate peripheral neurophysiologic function with perceptional deficits seen in autistic disorder (AD) have resulted in mixed findings, reflecting the high degree of heterogeneity observed in these individuals. We used the auditory brainstem response to study the effect of stress (high click presentation rate) on the auditory system in 20 children with AD (7-13 years) and 20 age-matched typically developing (TD) children. We report latency prolongations in children with AD vs. TD at waves I, III, and V that differed by ear of presentation: overall, left ear showed significant prolongations by group while right ear did not. The 'stressed' condition produced prolongations for both groups at each wave. At wave V, children with AD showed significant prolongations vs. TD, particularly for the right ear. For children with AD, wave V latency prolongations corresponded to language outcome as measured by VIQ, with longer prolongations associating with lower VIQ. Preliminary results provide evidence for reduced synaptic efficiency in auditory pathways in children with AD, which may form the neural bases for sensory reactivity and language impairment.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception/physiology , Autistic Disorder/physiopathology , Brain Stem/physiopathology , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Analysis of Variance , Audiometry , Auditory Pathways/physiopathology , Child , Ear , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous , Time Factors
2.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 1(1): 32-8, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18841250

ABSTRACT

Preclinical studies of chemoprevention drugs given in combination at low doses show remarkable efficacy in preventing adenomas with little additional toxicities, suggesting a strategy to improve risk to benefit ratios for preventing recurrent adenomas. Three hundred seventy-five patients with history of resected (> or =3 mm) adenomas were randomly assigned to receive oral difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) 500 mg and sulindac 150 mg once daily or matched placebos for 36 months, stratified by use of low-dose aspirin (81 mg) at baseline and clinical site. Follow-up colonoscopy was done 3 years after randomization or off-study. Colorectal adenoma recurrence was compared among the groups with log-binomial regression. Comparing the outcome in patients receiving placebos to those receiving active intervention, (a) the recurrence of one or more adenomas was 41.1% and 12.3% (risk ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.49; P < 0.001); (b) 8.5% had one or more advanced adenomas, compared with 0.7% of patients (risk ratio, 0.085; 95% confidence interval, 0.011-0.65; P < 0.001); and (c) 17 (13.2%) patients had multiple adenomas (>1) at the final colonoscopy, compared with 1 (0.7%; risk ratio, 0.055; 0.0074-0.41; P < 0.001). Serious adverse events (grade > or =3) occurred in 8.2% of patients in the placebo group, compared with 11% in the active intervention group (P = 0.35). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients reporting hearing changes from baseline. Recurrent adenomatous polyps can be markedly reduced by a combination of low oral doses of DFMO and sulindac and with few side effects.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/prevention & control , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Eflornithine/administration & dosage , Sulindac/administration & dosage , Adenoma/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Double-Blind Method , Eflornithine/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos , Sulindac/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
3.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 17(2): 292-9, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18268112

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is a major health issue, and prevention of prostate cancer and/or its progression will yield benefits for men. Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) is an antiproliferative agent, inhibiting ornithine decarboxylase, the first enzyme in the polyamine pathway, and has been studied as a therapeutic and chemopreventive agent. The prostate has high levels of tissue polyamines and has shown sensitivity to DFMO both in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: Eighty-one men participated in a 1-year randomized trial of placebo or DFMO. Prostate volume determination and biopsy of the prostate for histology and polyamine content were done at baseline and after 12 months. Other biomarker variables were assessed, including total and free prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen doubling time. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, men receiving DFMO had a smaller increase in prostate volume (0.14 cm(3)) than those on placebo (2.95 cm(3); P = 0.0301) at 1 year. In addition, DFMO caused a 60.8% reduction of prostate putrescine levels compared with a 139.5% increase in the placebo arm (P = 0.0014). Stratification by ornithine decarboxylase genotype showed that DFMO reduced prostate volume (P = 0.029) and putrescine levels (P = 0.0053) in the AA + GA group but not in the GG group. There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities. There was no clinical ototoxicity, with one subclinical grade 2 hearing decline on audiogram. CONCLUSION: In this randomized placebo-controlled trial, DFMO induced a decrease of prostate putrescine levels and rate of prostate growth. The potential of this compound for prostate cancer or hyperplasia should be further studied.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Eflornithine/pharmacology , Polyamines/metabolism , Prostate/drug effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Biopsy , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polymorphism, Genetic , Prostate/pathology , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Statistics, Nonparametric
4.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 1(7): 514-21, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19139001

ABSTRACT

A phase III clinical trial assessed the recurrence of adenomatous polyps after treatment for 36 months with difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) plus sulindac or matched placebos. Temporary hearing loss is a known toxicity of treatment with DFMO, thus a comprehensive approach was developed to analyze serial air conduction audiograms. The generalized estimating equation method estimated the mean difference between treatment arms with regard to change in air conduction pure tone thresholds while accounting for within-subject correlation due to repeated measurements at frequencies. Based on 290 subjects, there was an average difference of 0.50 dB between subjects treated with DFMO plus sulindac compared with those treated with placebo (95% confidence interval, -0.64 to 1.63 dB; P = 0.39), adjusted for baseline values, age, and frequencies. In the normal speech range of 500 to 3,000 Hz, an estimated difference of 0.99 dB (-0.17 to 2.14 dB; P = 0.09) was detected. Dose intensity did not add information to models. There were 14 of 151 (9.3%) in the DFMO plus sulindac group and 4 of 139 (2.9%) in the placebo group who experienced at least 15 dB hearing reduction from baseline in 2 or more consecutive frequencies across the entire range tested (P = 0.02). Follow-up air conduction done at least 6 months after end of treatment showed an adjusted mean difference in hearing thresholds of 1.08 dB (-0.81 to 2.96 dB; P = 0.26) between treatment arms. There was no significant difference in the proportion of subjects in the DFMO plus sulindac group who experienced clinically significant hearing loss compared with the placebo group. The estimated attributable risk of ototoxicity from exposure to the drug is 8.4% (95% confidence interval, -2.0% to 18.8%; P = 0.12). There is a <2 dB difference in mean threshold for patients treated with DFMO plus sulindac compared with those treated with placebo.


Subject(s)
Adenomatous Polyps/prevention & control , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Colonic Neoplasms/prevention & control , Hearing/drug effects , Double-Blind Method , Eflornithine/administration & dosage , Eflornithine/adverse effects , Hearing Loss/chemically induced , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Sulindac/administration & dosage , Sulindac/adverse effects
5.
Brain ; 126(Pt 7): 1604-19, 2003 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12805115

ABSTRACT

We studied a family with hereditary sensory motor neuropathy and deafness accompanying a missense mutation in the MPZ gene. Pathological examination of the cochlea in one of the family members revealed marked loss of auditory ganglion cells and central and peripheral auditory nerve fibres within the cochlea. The inner hair cells were of normal number with preserved morphology. The outer hair cells were normal in number except for a 30% reduction in just the apical turn. Examination of the sural nerve and the auditory nerve adjacent to the brainstem showed marked loss of fibres with evidence of incomplete remyelination of some of the remaining fibres. Studies of auditory function in surviving family members using electrophysiological and psychoacoustic methods provided evidence that the hearing deficits in this form of auditory neuropathy were probably related to a decrease of auditory nerve input accompanying axonal disease. Altered synchrony of discharge of the remaining fibres was a possible additional contributing factor.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics , Hereditary Sensory and Motor Neuropathy/genetics , Mutation, Missense , Myelin P0 Protein/genetics , Aged , Cochlea/pathology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/pathology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Hereditary Sensory and Motor Neuropathy/pathology , Hereditary Sensory and Motor Neuropathy/physiopathology , Humans , Middle Aged , Nerve Fibers/pathology , Pedigree , Psychoacoustics , Sural Nerve/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...