Propensity score matching analysis: incidence and risk factors for "stardust" gastric mucosa, a novel gastric finding potentially induced by vonoprazan.

BACKGROUND: Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is used for acid-related diseases. Occasionally, small white protrusions called "stardust" gastric mucosa have been detected in the stomachs of some patients taking vonoprazan. AIMS: To determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, stardust gastric mucosa potentially induced by vonoprazan METHODS: In this study, we enrolled 19 503 patients who underwent endoscopy at our hospital between 2016 and 2019. Using propensity score matching, we retrospectively compared patients who received and did not receive vonoprazan. The two groups were matched for age, sex, history of proton pump inhibitor use, and atrophic gastritis. RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity score matching, each group comprised 2516 patients. Stardust gastric mucosa was detected significantly more often in the stomachs of patients receiving vonoprazan than those who had not received vonoprazan (4.9% vs 0.2%, P < 0.001). Its location was 70.7% in the upper third of the stomach, 29.3% in the middle third and none in the lower third. Histologically, this lesion had a mucus pool within a dilated duct surrounded by flattened glandular epithelium. The cumulative incidence rate of stardust gastric mucosa at 1, 2 and 3 years was 4.6%, 16.5% and 26.2%, respectively. The factors independently associated with the presence of stardust gastric mucosa were >205 days of vonoprazan oral intake (odds ratio [OR]: 6.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.60-10.88) and female sex (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.20-2.58). CONCLUSIONS: Stardust gastric mucosa appeared more frequently in the stomachs of patients taking vonoprazan.

Real-World Comparison of Elobixibat and Lubiprostone Treatment in Patients with Chronic Constipation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Elobixibat is a new laxative, but its efficacy and adverse events (AEs) are insufficiently examined compared with those of other laxatives. Hence, by propensity score (PS) matching, we compared the effects and AEs between elobixibat and lubiprostone. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1,887 Japanese patients with chronic constipation (CC) treated at our hospital between October 2013 and April 2020. Enrolled patients were divided into three treatment groups, namely, elobixibat (10 mg daily) (E10 group, n = 293), lubiprostone (24 µg daily) (L24 group, n = 772), and lubiprostone (48 µg daily) (L48 group, n = 822), as their first treatment. We then investigated the changes on the weekly average number of spontaneous bowel movements, stool consistency scores (SCSs), and AEs starting from the baseline until the end of the 2-week treatment. To adjust for patients' background, we performed one-to-one nearest neighbor matching without replacement between elobixibat- and lubiprostone-treated patients according to the individual estimated PSs. RESULTS: After treatment, for SCSs, both the L24 and L48 groups significantly improved compared with the E10 group (p < 0.05), but their stools were soft (Bristol Stool Form Scale: 4.8). Notably, the E10 group had less frequent AEs than the L24 group (26 [9.0%] vs. 43 [14.8%], p = 0.03). Particularly, nausea was significantly less in the E10 group than that in the L48 group (2 [0.7%] vs. 7 [2.4%], p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Elobixibat is a beneficial drug for patients with mildly symptomatic CC and is safe to use, given its few AEs.