Combined Lymphovenous Anastomosis and Great Saphenous Vein Stripping for Comorbid Lymphedema and Varicose Veins.

Background: Treatment for patients with comorbid lymphedema and varicose veins is controversial. Surgical options for these patients are limited. The study was aimed to investigate the validity of combined lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and great saphenous vein stripping (GSVS) for comorbid lymphedema and varicose veins. Methods: Thirteen patients were involved in the study, and the detail was 21 edematous lower limbs (with coexisting varicose veins and lymphedema; the varicose vein and lymphedema [VL] group) who underwent combined GSVS and LVA therapy. Fifteen patients (with 30 edematous lower limbs and lymphedema only; the lymphedema [L] group) who underwent LVA only were included as a control group. GSVS was performed before LVA in the VL group. Results: No significant differences were seen between the groups at baseline. There were no cases indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography pattern deteriorated after GSVS. No significant difference was seen in lymphatic detection rate; 129.71% ± 58.27% (67%-333%) in the VL group and 122.27% ± 39.47% (50%-250%) in the L group (p = 0.59 > 0.05), respective lymphatic diameters 0.66 ± 0.13 (0.45-0.9) mm and 0.75 ± 0.17 (0.45-1.0) mm (p = 0.07 > 0.05), and respective lymphedema improvement rate 12.17% ± 7.35% (0%-27.4%) and 12.65% ± 7.43% (3.7%-22.3%) (p = 0.86 > 0.05). Discussion: In this study, stripping surgery does not cause lymphatic impairment, at least to the extent that would impede the success of an LVA procedure. Comorbid varicose veins and lymphedema can be treated surgically by a combination of LVA and GSVS.

Modified intraoperative distal compression method for lymphaticovenous anastomosis with high success and a low venous reflux rates.

INTRODUCTION: For successful lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA), it is important to create anastomoses with high flow to maintain patency. To ensure that this can be achieved, we compared the efficacy of a modified intraoperative distal compression (IDC) technique with the conventional no compression (NC) method for lower limb lymphedema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the IDC group, compression was applied to an area of the foot distal to the first LVA site. After completion of the first LVA, the distal compression was extended over the first LVA site to the distal end of the second LVA site. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the IDC (n = 25) and NC (n = 25) groups in detection rate. However, significant differences were observed in lymphatic vessel diameter and LVA success rate. No intraoperative anastomotic obstruction was seen at the conclusion of surgery. Intraoperative congestion with blood was detected in lymphatic vessels in 8 of 79 anastomoses (10.1%) in the NC group, but not in any cases in the IDC group (p = 0.002). There was a significant between-group difference in the rate of improvement in lymphedema between the IDC (16.1±3.6) and NC groups (14.0±3.4; p = 0.03). DISCUSSION: IDC during LVA is thought to increase lymph flow in larger caliber lymphatics, leading to a high success rate and a low rate of venous reflux. IDC is beneficial when performing LVA.

Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Morbidly Obese Patients with Lymphedema.

Although patients with obesity-induced lymphedema can be treated by weight loss therapy, they find it difficult to lose the required amount of weight. The aims of this study were to clarify the characteristics of the lymphatic vessels in patients with obesity-induced lymphedema and to determine the feasibility and efficacy of lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) in these patients. METHODS: Twenty-two patients (44 edematous lower limbs) with a body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2 (obese group) and 91 patients with lymphedema (141 edematous lower limbs) and BMI <25 kg/m2 were enrolled as a control group (nonobese group) and underwent LVA. The diameter and depth of lymphatics and the effect of LVA were compared. RESULTS: Lymphatics were detectable within 10-mm depth in the nonobese group and the obese group (3.0 ± 1.4 mm versus 3.5 ± 2.1 mm; P < 0.01). The lymphatic diameter was significantly greater in the obese group than in the nonobese group (0.79 ± 0.30 mm versus 0.54 ± 0.22 mm; P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the rate of improvement in lymphedema after LVA between the nonobese group (9.1% ± 9.2%) and the obese group (8.9% ± 7.3%; P = 0.84). There was no correlation between the improvement rate of lymphedema and that of BMI in the obese group (P = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: LVA is a feasible procedure even in morbidly obese patients. Considering that substantial weight loss is a difficult and time-consuming task for patients, LVA combined with not gaining weight is a good option for these patients.

Indocyanine green lymphography findings in older patients with lower limb lymphedema.

OBJECTIVE: Lymphedema is classified as primary or secondary according to the underlying cause. Primary lymphedema is hereditary and is considered a consequence of an inherited abnormality of the lymphatic system. Secondary lymphedema, however, is a consequence of lymphatic failure resulting from trauma, parasitic infection, or iatrogenic obstruction. Primary lymphedema is divided into three broad groups, namely, lymphedema congenita, lymphedema praecox, and lymphedema tarda. With the exception of lymphedema tarda, it is thought that age-related deterioration in lymphatic pump function is caused by oxidative stress. The aim of this study was to evaluate and to classify indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography findings in patients with lower limb lymphedema to ascertain whether there is a pattern to age-related deterioration. METHODS: There were 56 patients (104 edematous lower limbs) who had undergone ICG lymphography and for whom the lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) index had been calculated enrolled in this study. Specific inclusion criteria were used to exclude other causes of edema. ICG lymphography images were recorded in the plateau phase (12-18 hours after injection), when no further changes of images would be expected. The LEL index was calculated by summation of the squares of the circumference for five areas in each lower extremity divided by the body mass index. RESULTS: The clinical lymphedema pattern was determined as bilateral in 48 patients and unilateral in 8 patients. Patients with bilateral lymphedema were significantly older than those with unilateral lymphedema (76.40 ± 8.03 years vs 53.13 ± 14.12 years; P < .01). The ICG lymphography pattern was categorized as linear, low enhancement (LE), distal dermal backflow (DB), or extended DB in bilateral lymphedema. ICG lymphography showed the DB pattern on both the thigh and lower leg regions in all eight legs with unilateral lymphedema. There were also significant between-group differences in the LEL index (linear vs distal DB, P < .05; linear vs extended DB, P < .01; linear vs unilateral, P < .01; LE vs extended DB, P < .01; LE vs unilateral, P < .01; distal DB vs extended DB, P < .05; and distal DB vs unilateral, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, unilateral lymphedema, with its younger age at onset, severity, and unilateral dominance, corresponded to lymphedema tarda. In contrast, bilateral lymphedema corresponded to senile lymphedema, which is distinct from primary lymphedema in general and lymphedema tarda in particular. Age-related deterioration in lymphatic pump function rather than iatrogenic obstruction or genetic abnormality is likely to account for the characteristic older age at onset of lymphedema and its progression from the distal region.

Microscope-Induced Thermal Burns During Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis.

Bright illumination sources using xenon lamps have improved microsurgical visualization under an operating microscope; however, surgeons must recognize the potential for accidental thermal damage to soft tissues.In this article, we present 2 reports of microscopic thermal burn in lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA).A 23-year-old woman and a 57-year-old woman with bilateral lymphedema of the legs had LVAs on both legs under local anesthesia. The burn wound in a 23-year-old woman was full thickness, and the one in a 57-year-old woman was deep dermal burn. Both of them healed without skin grafting.Working distance and high illumination intensity are important risk factor. The use of epinephrine as part the local anesthetic mixture that decreases blood flow is also a major risk factor for thermal burns. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis particularly requires high magnification, which leads to increasing the intensity and decreasing the working distance. The surgical conditions around LVA are inherently prone to microscope-induced thermal burns.

Characteristics and outcomes of lymphaticovenular anastomosis in older patients with bilateral involvement versus younger patients with unilateral involvement in lower extremity lymphedema.

OBJECTIVE: We have previously reported that patients with idiopathic primary lymphedema of adult onset can be classified into an older group with bilateral involvement and a younger group with unilateral involvement and that there are significant differences in the characteristics of these groups. The aims of this study were to investigate the features of these two groups further by evaluating the lymphatics while performing lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) and to compare the effectiveness of LVA between the two groups. METHODS: This study enrolled 74 patients (136 edematous legs) in whom indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography and LVA were performed. The rate of detection and the diameter of the lymphatic vessels were recorded. The lower extremity lymphedema index (the total sum of the squares of the circumference for five areas in each leg divided by the body mass index) was obtained before and 6 months after LVA. The rate of improvement in the affected lower limbs after LVA was also calculated. RESULTS: The clinical lymphedema pattern was determined to be bilateral in 62 patients and unilateral in 12. Patients with bilateral lymphedema were significantly older than those with unilateral lymphedema (77.1 ± 7.8 years vs 55.5 ± 12.77 years; P < .01). A linear pattern was seen in 23 patients (46 legs), a low enhancement (LE) pattern in 12 patients (24 legs), a distal dermal backflow (dDB) pattern in 20 patients (40 legs), and an extended dermal backflow (eDB) pattern in 7 patients (14 legs). The lymphedema was unilateral in 12 patients (12 legs). There were significant between-group differences in lymphatic diameter in relation to lower leg area: linear (0.9 ± 0.1 mm) vs dDB (0.7 ± 0.2 mm), linear vs eDB (0.7 ± 0.2 mm), linear vs unilateral (0.5 ± 0.1 mm), LE (0.9 ± 0.2 mm) vs dDB, LE vs eDB, LE vs unilateral, and dDB vs unilateral, P < .01; and eDB vs unilateral, P < .05. There were also significant between-group differences in the rate of improvement in the lower extremity lymphedema index according to the ICG lymphography pattern and laterality: linear (10.5% ± 2.4%) vs unilateral (6.7% ± 0.6%), LE (10.4% ± 1.5%) vs unilateral, dDB (11.0% ± 1.3%) vs eDB (8.9% ± 1.5%), and dDB vs unilateral, P < .01; linear vs eDB, P < .05; and eDB vs unilateral, P < .05. CONCLUSIONS: The lymphatic vessel diameter tended to be greater in older patients with bilateral lymphedema than in younger patients with unilateral lymphedema. The rate of detection and improvement tended to decrease with worsening of the ICG lymphography pattern. LVA is thought to be more effective in older patients with early-stage bilateral lower leg lymphedema than in their younger counterparts with late-stage unilateral lymphedema.

Lymphovenous Anastomosis Aids Wound Healing in Lymphedema: Relationship Between Lymphedema and Delayed Wound Healing from a View of Immune Mechanisms.

Delayed wound healing in lymphedema is assumed to be caused by two reasons, pathophysiological and immunological effects of lymphedema. The aim of this review is to establish how impaired lymphatics alter wound healing pathophysiologically and immunologically, and to propose treatment modalities that can promote wound healing in lymphedema. Lymphaticovenular anastomoses (lymphovenous anastomoses [LVAs]) were performed on patients who had recurrent cellulitis several times with lymphorrhea and developed severe ulcers that were refractory to skin grafts, flaps, and conservative therapy. The lymphorrhea and the ulcer had healed by 4 weeks. Moreover, the lymphedema improved without compression therapy. Lymphedema is characterized pathophysiologically by localized peripheral edema that compresses the microvasculature and lymphatic vasculature and impairs tissue remodeling. Another suspected mechanism is an imbalance in the differentiation of participating immune cells. Profound suppression of T helper (Th)1 cells is likely to increase the risk of infection, and excessive differentiation of Th2 cells, including M2 macrophage polarization, may promote fibrosis, which disrupts the carefully orchestrated wound healing process. Although negative-pressure wound therapy is useful for the treatment of delayed wound healing in lymphedema, LVAs may be necessary to treat the fundamental problem of lymphedema. LVAs are considered to create a bypass to the lymph nodes through which dendritic cells (DCs) can transmit antigen information to T cells. LVAs are considered to neutralize chronic inflammation by allowing more DCs to return into the circulation, thereby improving wound healing.

Localized lymphedema after treatment for soft tissue sarcoma in the lower limbs: Comparison of improvement according to duration before lymphaticovenular anastomosis.

Surgically invasive procedures involving the medial knee and inguinal regions can cause lymphedema. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) could improve volume reduction and decrease the risk of cellulitis. However, it may be preferable to performed LVA as early as possible to achieve optimal results.

Lymphaticovenular anastomosis and venous arterialization in coexisting Raynaud's phenomenon and lymphedema: A case report.

Raynaud's phenomenon is highly prevalent in the general population. The optimal medical management for patients with severe Raynaud's phenomenon remains unclear. Venous arterialization (VA) may be considered as a salvage procedure when no distal vessels are available for vascular reconstruction. Surgical treatments for lymphedema, including lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA), are becoming popular alternatives to conservative therapy. Here, we report on a patient with comorbid primary Raynaud's phenomenon and lymphedema in whom both VA and LVA were performed. The patient was a 60-year-old woman with an edematous right upper limb and pain and cold sensitivity in the middle, ring, and small fingers that was refractory to medication. Indocyanine green lymphography and computed tomography angiography suggested coexistence of lymphedema and primary Raynaud's phenomenon. VA and LVA were performed to reduce the risks of cellulitis and amputation. Computed tomography angiography was performed regularly after surgery to examine the arterialized venous system and Doppler echography to search for developing branches. Five months later, three branches of the arterialized veins that flowed proximally at the level of the hand and wrist were ligated. By around 1 year after surgery, the lymphedema index in the affected upper limb had improved from 116 to 103 and the patient's numerical rating scale score for intractable pain and cold sensitivity had improved from 6-7 to 1-2. We believe that the combination of VA and LVA in the early stages of primary Raynaud's phenomenon and lymphedema was effective in this case.

Line production system for multiple lymphaticovenular anastomoses.

BACKGROUND: A drawback of multiple lymphaticovenular anastomoses (LVAs) is the need for at least two microsurgeons and the same number of microscopes. In practice, many hospitals find it difficult to access such resources. We have developed a novel line production system (LPS) to address this problem. We assessed whether or not the LPS is better than the conventional dual microscope (DM) system when performing multiple LVAs. METHODS: An LPS group, wherein a novice microsurgeon used loupes to dissect lymphatics and an expert microsurgeon used a microscope to perform the LVAs, and a DM (control) group, wherein the surgeons used microscopes to perform the LVAs. We recorded the lymphatic detection rate through the loupes and the diameter of the detected lymphatics. We also investigated the impact of using the LPS by comparing the number and quality of LVAs and improvement in lymphedema between the study groups. RESULTS: The mean lymphatic detection rate was 81%±15.60%, and the mean size of lymphatics was 0.44 ± 0.12 mm in the LPS. The number of LVAs/h in LPS was significantly higher than that in DM (2.15 ± 0.20 vs. 1.38 ± 0.17; p < 0.01). The number of successful LVAs/h in LPS was significantly higher than that in the DM (2.08 ± 0.22 vs. 0.84 ± 0.14; P < 0.01). Mean rate of improvement in LEL index was significantly higher than that in DM (9.36 ± 1.85 vs. 6.93 ± 1.73; P < 0.01). DISCUSSION: The number and quality of the LVAs increase using the LPS, which leads to further improvement in lymphedema, with fewer microscopes and microsurgeons and a shorter operating time.

Lymphatic flow restoration after stripping surgery for varicose veins: A case report.

It has been suggested that the dynamics of the venous and lymphatic systems interact as a mutually dependent dual outflow system and that derangement of lymph flow could be reversed by surgical treatment of venous incompetence. In this report, we describe a patient in whom lymphatic function was restored after stripping of the great saphenous vein for varicosity. The patient was a 79-year-old woman who had varicose veins along the medial side of an edematous left leg. Lymphatic function was investigated using indocyanine green imaging to evaluate for the presence of lymphedema. Based on the findings, we made a diagnosis of bilateral varicosity of the great saphenous vein with left-sided lymphedema. The great saphenous vein was stripped between the groin and ankle on both sides. At 3 months after the stripping procedure, lymphatic flow was observed immediately after injection of indocyanine green in both legs along the medial side from the foot to the groin. We therefore determined that lymphatic flow had been restored after the stripping surgery. The functions of the venous and lymphatic systems are thought to be closely related, and that, if the function of one declines, the other will also be affected. Treatment of venous system, including stripping, may help to break the vicious cycle of lymphatic stasis and venous insufficiency.

Mechanical Dilation With a Nylon Monofilament for 0.1-mm Anastomoses.

Despite advances in supermicrosurgical techniques, the ability to anastomose vessels with a diameter of less than 0.2 mm remains limited. One of the reasons for this limitation is that the dilation methods currently available, such as inserting the tip of a microforceps into the lumen or topical application of a vasodilator such as papaverine hydrochloride or xylocaine spray, are not effective in very small vessels. To overcome this problem, we have developed a method whereby nylon monofilaments are placed inside the vessel lumen to act as a dilator. Using this method, a smaller nylon monofilament is inserted into the vessel as a guide before inserting a larger nylon monofilament as a dilator. After the smaller guide monofilament has been inserted, it is then much easier to insert another monofilament for dilation, even if it is a larger one. Using this method, even a vessel with a diameter of less than 0.1 mm could be dilated to greater than 0.2 mm. The dilator monofilament can also be used as an intravascular stent in the anastomosis. We have found that anastomosis of vessels with a diameter of less than 0.1 mm is possible using this method. In our experience, the immediate patency rate has been 100%. We believe mechanical dilation with a nylon monofilament is helpful for supermicrosurgery and even ultramicrosurgery.

Mechanical Dilation Using Nylon Monofilament Aids Multisite Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis Through Improving the Quality of Anastomosis.

Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) is now a common treatment for lymphedema. It is important to create as many bypasses as possible to maximize the efficacy of LVA. We have developed a method whereby nylon monofilaments are placed inside the vessel lumen to act as dilators. We refer to this technique as mechanical dilation (MD) to distinguish it from intravascular stenting. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of the conventional supermicrosurgery technique performed with and without MD as a treatment for lower limb lymphedema. The LVA was performed using conventional supermicrosurgery alone in 10 patients (group without MD) and in combination with MD in another 10 patients (group with MD). The mean number of successful LVAs performed per hour was significantly higher in the group with MD than in the group without MD (1.42 ± 0.16 vs 1.14 ± 0.15; P < 0.05). The mean amount of improvement in the lower extremity lymphedema index was significantly greater in the group with MD than in the group without MD (7.34 ± 1.57 vs 4.41 ± 1.53; P = 0.003 < 0.05). A statistically significant correlation was found between the number of successful LVAs and amount of improvement in lymphedema (r = 0.449, P = 0.047 < 0.05). Our findings suggest that use of MD does not shorten the operating time or increase the number of LVAs that can be performed but may make it possible to increase the number of successful LVAs that can be performed between vessels with a diameter of less than 0.3 mm. Use of MD could increase the improvement rate of lymphedema to a greater extent than that achieved by conventional microsurgery alone.