ABSTRACT
The analysis of deoxynivalenol (DON) in silage samples using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) often leads to an overestimation. To better analyze DON in rice and corn silages using a commercially available ELISA kit, a cleanup method using a MultiSep #226 column was developed. As a result, overestimation of DON by the influence of specific cross-reaction with acetyldeoxynivalenol (AcDON) was confirmed. In samples where AcDON was not detected by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (LC-MS), no samples showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in DON amounts between ELISA with cleanup and LC-MS analysis. For the recovery study, blank silage was spiked with 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg DON. The mean recoveries of DON determined by ELISA with cleanup and LC-MS analysis were 112 and 96%, respectively, and the relative standard deviation for the repeatability (RSDr) were 8.2 and 9.8%, respectively. No samples showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in DON concentration determined by either ELISA or LC-MS analysis. A collaborative study to validate this rapid method was carried out using four samples, two rice and two corn silage, by 10 participating laboratories. Each sample was analyzed using blind duplicates. The mean values of DON detected were 1.5-2.3 mg/kg, RSDr and the relative standard deviation for the reproducibility (RSDR) were 4.1-12.7 and 7.6-23.4%, respectively, and the HorRat values were 0.5-1.6. Therefore, the overestimation of DON by the influence of nonspecific cross-reaction with sample matrix was reduced by the cleanup method using a MultiSep #226 column, and analysis of DON in silage was improved. This use of this method for estimation of DON contamination in silage allows rapid detection at the place of use that is likely to result in improved animal health.
Subject(s)
Chemistry Techniques, Analytical/methods , Oryza/chemistry , Silage/analysis , Toxicology/methods , Trichothecenes/analysis , Zea mays/chemistry , Animals , Cross Reactions , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Specimen Handling/methodsABSTRACT
To improve the performance of the analytical method for neutral detergent fiber in feed with heat-stable α-amylase treatment (aNDFom), the process of adding heat-stable α-amylase, as well as other analytical conditions, were examined. In this new process, the starch in the samples was removed by adding amylase to neutral detergent (ND) solution twice, just after the start of heating and immediately after refluxing. We also examined the effects of the use of sodium sulfite, and drying and ashing conditions for aNDFom analysis by this modified amylase addition method. A collaborative study to validate this new method was carried out with 15 laboratories. These laboratories analyzed two samples, alfalfa pellet and dairy mixed feed, with blind duplicates. Ten laboratories used a conventional apparatus and five used a Fibertec(®) type apparatus. There were no significant differences in aNDFom values between these two refluxing apparatuses. The aNDFom values in alfalfa pellet and dairy mixed feed were 388 g/kg and 145 g/kg, the coefficients of variation for the repeatability and reproducibility (CV(r) and CV(R) ) were 1.3% and 2.9%, and the HorRat values were 0.8 and 1.1, respectively. This new method was validated with 5.8% uncertainty (k = 2) from the collaborative study.
