Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Paediatr Dent ; 22(3): 219-224, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34544251

ABSTRACT

AIM: Custom-made mouthguards have many advantages compared to the stock and ready-made types, but sport treatments with custom made mouthguards involve changes in ecological factors of the oral cavity. In the present study we investigated the potential protective role of salivary factors, such as pH value, volume, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and 8-iso-prostaglandin F2? (8-iso-PGF2?) levels during training with customised mouthguards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 subjects were selected: 40 athletes, of whom 20 practice volleyball and 20 basketball (test group), and 40 subjects who attend a gym at a non-competitive level (control group). The athletes (test group) were analyzed at baseline (T0), pre-training (T1), post-training with custom-made Ethylene-Vinyl-Acetate (EVA) mouthguards (T2), post-training without mouthguards (T3). The control group was analyzed only at baseline (T0). On each player, in the 4 time points, and on the control group at T0, we stimulated saliva for determining PGE2 and 8-iso-PGF2? levels by radioimmunoassay and pH value by a pH meter and volume/ml. Saliva pH was calculated with a pH meter. RESULTS: We observed an inhibition of 8-iso-PGF2? salivary release induced by physical exercise and by use of custom-made mouthguard, while we found an increase in PGE2 salivary level in athletes after training and wearing the mouthguard. Furthermore, in the test of the volume of saliva produced in 5 minutes, a significant inhibition of saliva production emerged in the athletes who did not use the mouthguard during sports activities. CONCLUSION: Sports activity could lead to a reduction in oxidative stress and the use of mouth guards seems even more effective for athletes.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Mouth Protectors , Athletes , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Equipment Design , Humans , Mouth/injuries , Saliva
2.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents ; 32(4): 1045-1049, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30043592

ABSTRACT

Sport mouthguards have the potential to become a microbial reservoir, produce oral and systemic diseases and cause negative changes in the oral cavity. The aim of this study was to monitor oral environmental changes caused by casein and sport-mouthguard in vivo, through clinical, salivary and bacterial markers of young athletes. Forty-eight active young athletes in different disciplines were selected and analysed at different times: baseline (T0); after three months of casein application on the mouthguard (T1); and after six months of application (T2). The product used was GC Tooth Mousse®. At T0, clinical monitoring was performed and the following parameters were recorded: Decay-Missing-Filled Teeth (DMFT) index, Plaque index (PL+) and Gingival Bleeding (BOP+). Saliva-Check Buffer GC® and Saliva-CheckMutans GC® salivary tests were then performed. At T0 the athletes demonstrated DMFT 0.03±0.01. PL value was positive in 100% of subjects at T0, T1, and T2. The BI value was always negative. At the three time-points, a significant change in baseline hydration values was observed; baseline viscosity was normal in 50% of cases while it increased in the remaining 50% at T0; it was normal and constant at T1 and T2. The value of the baseline pH underwent an not statistically significant increase at T1 (7.6±0.08) while remaining constant at T2. The amount of saliva produced after 5-min stimulation ranged significantly and gradually from T0 to T1 and T2, with a statistically significant difference. Plaque indicator tests highlighted that at T0 a plaque with a pH of 6.0±0.5 prevailed; at T1 it was 6.25±0.75 while at T2, pH was equal to 6. Tests for the detection of S. mutans resulted constant in all subjects at the various observation times, resulting in 67% of patients in whom S. mutans was present. The application of casein, within custom-made ethylene- vinyl acetate (EVA) mouthguards, positively influences salivary flow, the increase of pH values, the amount of stimulated saliva and the buffering capacity of the athlete, improving their state of oral health, which is negatively affected by the use of common mouthguards.


Subject(s)
Caseins/pharmacology , Mouth Protectors , Mouth/drug effects , Oral Health , Sports Equipment , Adolescent , Athletes , Child , Dental Plaque Index , Humans , Male , Mouth/microbiology , Saliva/drug effects
3.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents ; 31(2): 487-493, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28685557

ABSTRACT

Sports mouthguards have the potential to become a microbial reservoir, to produce oral and systemic diseases and cause changes in environmental oral factors, inhibiting the protective effect of saliva. The aim of this study was to monitor, in vivo, oral environmental changes caused by chlorhexidine and sports mouthguards and in vitro, the effects of microbial strains, saliva and chlorhexidine on Ethylene-Vinyl-Acetate (EVA) material. Seventy-two athletes were analyzed at different time points: before training session (T0), post-training (TA), post-training with mouthguard (TB), post-training with mouthguard and chlorhexidine (TC). At each time of observation, saliva was collected and subjected to microbiological analysis. In vitro, EVA disks were incubated with bacterial cultures, saliva and clorexidine. Culture of supernatant solution, SEM and bacterial counts of EVA disks were performed. S. mutans and Candida spp. load decreased significantly in TC. The pH value significantly decreased in TB and improved in TC. In vitro, the analyzed bacteria were organized to form a biofilm on the EVA disk surface. The addition of chlorhexidine to the bacterial culture and saliva inhibited the growth in all tested conditions. In vivo, the use of chlorhexidine associated with the sports mouthguard inhibited the growth of pathogenic microbial species, and improved pH values. In vitro, EVA stimulated biofilm formation on its surface, but this action was contrasted by chlorhexidine. The effects found in vitro encouraged the use of chlorhexidine in vivo as a valuable tool in the use of mouthguards.


Subject(s)
Athletes , Biofilms/drug effects , Candida/physiology , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Mouth Protectors/microbiology , Saliva/microbiology , Streptococcus mutans/physiology , Adult , Biofilms/growth & development , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...