Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 53(5): 1672-6, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25762766

ABSTRACT

Candida species are common causes of bloodstream infections (BSI), with high mortality. Four species cause >90% of Candida BSI: C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis. Differentiation of Candida spp. is important because of differences in virulence and antimicrobial susceptibility. Candida QuickFISH BC, a multicolor, qualitative nucleic acid hybridization assay for the identification of C. albicans (green fluorescence), C. glabrata (red fluorescence), and C. parapsilosis (yellow fluorescence), was tested on Bactec and BacT/Alert blood culture bottles which signaled positive on automated blood culture devices and were positive for yeast by Gram stain at seven study sites. The results were compared to conventional identification. A total of 419 yeast-positive blood culture bottles were studied, consisting of 258 clinical samples (89 C. glabrata, 79 C. albicans, 23 C. parapsilosis, 18 C. tropicalis, and 49 other species) and 161 contrived samples inoculated with clinical isolates (40 C. glabrata, 46 C. albicans, 36 C. parapsilosis, 19 C. tropicalis, and 20 other species). A total of 415 samples contained a single fungal species, with C. glabrata (n = 129; 30.8%) being the most common isolate, followed by C. albicans (n = 125; 29.8%), C. parapsilosis (n = 59; 14.1%), C. tropicalis (n = 37; 8.8%), and C. krusei (n = 17; 4.1%). The overall agreement (with range for the three major Candida species) between the two methods was 99.3% (98.3 to 100%), with a sensitivity of 99.7% (98.3 to 100%) and a specificity of 98.0% (99.4 to 100%). This study showed that Candida QuickFISH BC is a rapid and accurate method for identifying C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis, the three most common Candida species causing BSI, directly from blood culture bottles.


Subject(s)
Blood/microbiology , Candida/classification , Candida/isolation & purification , Candidemia/diagnosis , Candidemia/microbiology , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , Microbiological Techniques/methods , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Candida/genetics , Humans , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol ; 12(1): 17-21, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15460191

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the Affirm VPIII Microbial Identification Test for detection and identification of Candida species, Gardnerella vaginalis and Trichomonas vaginalis to clinical and microscopic criteria commonly used to diagnose vaginitis. METHODS: Women that were symptomatic for vaginitis/vaginosis and asymptomatic women being seen for routine obstetric or gynecological care were included in this study. Women treated with antibiotics or antifungals within one week or women who had douched within 24 hours were excluded. Two vaginal swab specimens were simultaneously obtained from each patient, one swab was placed in sterile physiological saline for immediate microscopic wet mount examination and KOH testing. The other swab was placed in the Affirm collection tube for Affirm VPIII testing based on previously demonstrated methods. RESULTS: The Affirm assay was significantly more likely to identify Gardnerella and Candida than wet mount. 190 (45%) were positive for Gardnerella by Affirm compared to 58 (14%) by wet mount; 45 (11%) were positive for Candida by Affirm compared to 31 (7%) by wet mount; and 30 (7%) were positive for Trichomonas by Affirm compared to 23 (5%) by wet mount. Symptomatic women were significantly more likely to be positive by Affirm only (23% vs. 10%), wet mount only (3% vs. 2%) or Affirm and wet mount (15% vs. 1%). Asymptomatic women were significantly more likely to be negative for Affirm and wet mount (43% vs. 5%). CONCLUSIONS: The Affirm VPIII test is a more sensitive diagnostic test for detection and identification of symptomatic vaginitis/vaginosis than conventional clinical examination and wet mount testing.


Subject(s)
Vaginal Diseases/diagnosis , Vaginal Diseases/epidemiology , Vaginal Smears/standards , Animals , Candida/isolation & purification , Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal/diagnosis , Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal/epidemiology , Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal/microbiology , Female , Gardnerella vaginalis/isolation & purification , Humans , Indiana/epidemiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity , Trichomonas Vaginitis/diagnosis , Trichomonas Vaginitis/epidemiology , Trichomonas Vaginitis/microbiology , Trichomonas vaginalis/isolation & purification , Vaginal Diseases/microbiology , Vaginosis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Vaginosis, Bacterial/epidemiology , Vaginosis, Bacterial/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL