Is primary CNS lymphoma really becoming more common? A population-based study of incidence, clinicopathological features and outcomes in Alberta from 1975 to 1996.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is believed to be increasing in immunocompetent patients but this may not be universally true. The objective of this study was to determine in a population if the incidence of PCNSL is increasing, if the histologic subtypes are changing, and to describe the clinicopathologic and outcome characteristics of PCNSL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified all Alberta residents with a histologic diagnosis of PCNSL from 1 January 1975 to 31 December 1996 using the Alberta Cancer Registry. Annual age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR), clinicopathologic and outcome characteristics were determined. RESULTS: There were 50 immunocompetent PCNSL patients; the median age was 64 and 30 were male. Their median survival was 10.15 months. Histology was available for review in 37 (74%) patients: 19 (51%) were diffuse large cell, 16 (43%) were immunoblastic and 2 (5%) were unclassifiable malignant lymphomas. The ASIR ranged from 0.178-1.631/10(6) and no change in ASIR was found (test for trend, P = 0.26) for gender or age. The ASIR of malignant gliomas did not change either but increased for all other non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (94.95-138.7610(6); test for trend, P = 0.0001) The number of brain biopsies increased from 1979-1985 (test for trend, P < 0.0001) but remained stable from 1986-1996 (test for trend, P = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike several other populations, PCNSL is not becoming significantly more common in Alberta. If this difference is real (i.e., not due to differences in cancer registry coding practices etc.) comparisons between Albertans and other populations in whom the incidence is rising may provide clues regarding the etiology of PCNSL.

Survival improvement in anaplastic astrocytoma, combining external radiation with halogenated pyrimidines: final report of RTOG 86-12, Phase I-II study.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the toxicity and tumor efficacy of the halopyrimidine IUdR as a chemical modifier of radiation response in patients with malignant glioma. The preliminary results published in 1993 demonstrated no real advantage in the group of patients with glioblastoma. However, a benefit appeared to be evolving in the group of patients with Anaplastic Astrocytoma (AA). We are now presenting the results on the long-term follow-up of patients with AA. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between August 1987 and October 1991, 79 patients were entered in a prospective study with newly diagnosed malignant glioma. Twenty-one of 79 were AA. The study was designed to have a fixed dose of radiation consisting of 60.16 Gy in 32 fractions in 6.5 weeks but varying the dose schedule of IUdR, delivered in a continuous intravenous infusion of long (96 h) or short (48 and 24 h) duration, every week for the 6.5 weeks of radiation treatment. RESULTS: The last AA patient was entered in March 1991. Ninety-five percent of the AA patients were under 59 years of age and 86% had a Karnofsky score 80. Thirty-eight percent had a tumor diameter of less than 5 cm and 52% had a tumor diameter between 5-10 cm. Seventy-six percent had partial or total tumor resection. The toxicity of this treatment was acceptable and has already been published elsewhere. At the time of this report, 14 out of 21 patients with AA are dead. The median survival, calculated from the Kaplan-Meier, is 3.2 years. Thirty-three percent of the patients have survived 5 years. These results compare favorably with the best results reported in the literature with postoperative external radiation plus chemotherapy, median survival time (MST) of 3 years, and previous Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) experience with radiation alone, MST of 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings in patients with AA corroborate the improved therapeutic results published recently when combining external radiation with "long" infusion of i.v. BUdR and indicate the need to proceed with randomized Phase III studies utilizing halogenated pyrimidines and radiation. One such study has already been activated, RTOG # 94-04.

Iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) combined with radiation in the treatment of malignant glioma: a comparison of short versus long intravenous dose schedules (RTOG 86-12).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and tumor efficacy of the halopyrimidine IUdR (NSC #39661, IND 22475) as a chemical modifier of radiation response when used in a high dose short time infusion versus the acceptable 4 day infusion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In August 1987 we initiated a prospective study in patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma. The study was designed to have a fixed dose of radiation (60.16 Gy = 1.88 Gy in 32 fractions in 6.5 weeks) but varying the dose schedule of IUdR, keeping the total dose between 21 and 24 g/m2. IUdR was delivered in a 96, 48, or 24 hr continuous intravenous infusion per week for 6.5 weeks during radiation treatment. RESULTS: The study was closed for patient accrual on October 1, 1991. Twenty-two patients were treated on the 96 hrs, 32 on the 48 hr and 25 on the 24 hr schedules. The incidence of glioblastoma ranged between 68 and 75% in the three arms. Seventy percent of the patients had a Karnofsky of 80-90% at the onset of treatment. Over 50% of the patient population were under age 55. Drug tolerance was related to the duration of the IUdR infusion. Toxicities were most pronounced in the 96 hr IUdR infusion schedule where 27.4% of the patients reported a grade 3 drug toxicity. No fatal or grade 4 toxicities were observed. More patients on the 24 and 48 hr schedule received at least 80% of the IUdR dose specified per protocol. We did not observe a trend in acute normal tissue radiation reactions in any of the three arms. The median survivals calculated from the Kaplan-Meier plot are 13.4, 10.5, and 11 months, respectively, for the 96, 48, and 24 hr infusions. The Cox Proportional Hazards model showed that any difference in survival can be attributed to histological grade, type of previous surgery and, to some extent, age of the patient. Dose schedule was not a significant predictor of survival, although statistically nonsignificant trend toward longer survival is seen in those patients with glioblastoma treated in the "long" 4 day schedule. CONCLUSION: Overall, our treatment combination, particularly for patients with glioblastoma, has not shown convincing evidence of an improvement in survival. Of interest, however, it is the 2 year survival rate of 68% for patients with anaplastic astrocytoma. In our experience, the administration of IUdR is laborious, time consuming and with bothersome acute gastrointestinal and hematological toxicities.

Increasing radiation dose intensity using hyperfractionation in patients with malignant glioma. Final report of a prospective phase I-II dose response study.

We attempted to show a dose effect relationship for radiation therapy by treating patients harbouring malignant glioma with increasing doses of radiation in a step-wise fashion. We postulated that no increase in delayed toxicity would be seen because we used hyperfractionation technique. Between January 1981 and December 1988 we treated 280 patients three times daily at 4 hour intervals. 100 patients received a total dose of 6141 cGy, 73 patients received 7120 cGy, and 107 patients received 8000 cGy. CCNU was given at the time of tumor progression following radiotherapy. Median time to tumor progression was 28 weeks for patients who received 6141 cGy, 27 weeks for patients who received 7120 cGy and 36 weeks for patients who received 8000 cGy. Median survival was 46 weeks for patients who received 6141 cGy, 38 weeks for patients who received 7120 cGy and 45 weeks for patients who received 8000 cGy. There was no statistically significant difference in either time to tumor progression or survival among the three treatment arms and no dose response effect was seen. There was no increase in delayed radiation toxicity when the total radiation dose was increased up to 8000 cGy.

Radiosensitivity testing of human primary brain tumor specimens.

The inherent radiosensitivity of early passage cells derived from 22 patients with tumors of glial origin has been determined using a clonogenic assay system. The mean (+/- SD) surviving fraction at 2 Gy was 0.37 +/- 0.22 (range = 0.02-0.87). No correlation between inherent radiosensitivity and tumor cell plating efficiency or intracellular glutathione was observed. Tumor cells that were both resistant to nitrosoureas and expressed the Mer+ phenotype did not differ significantly in their radiosensitivity as compared to cells that were repair deficient (Mer-) and sensitive to nitrosoureas. Initial clinical follow-up suggests that factors in addition to inherent tumor cell radiosensitivity, such as performance status and age, continue to be the most important determinants of the response of patients with primary brain tumors to radiotherapy.

Glutathione levels and chemosensitizing effects of buthionine sulfoximine in human malignant glioma cells.

Biopsy samples and cultured cells derived from them were obtained from 39 patients with malignant glioma and were analyzed for 1) glutathione (GSH) content; 2) sensitivity to 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) and/or nitrogen mustard (HN2) treatment and 3) the effect of buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) treatment on BCNU and/or HN2 cytotoxicity. The average GSH concentration of biopsy specimens was lower than those of cultured cells (2.36 +/- 0.44 vs. 11.42 +/- 2.32 nmol/10(6) cells). While some of the tumor specimens were sensitive to either BCNU or HN2, the majority were resistant to both. However, 8 of 23 tumors tested showed enhanced sensitivity to BCNU following treatment with BSO. Five of 17 tumors were similarly sensitized to HN2 by BSO. These results suggest that BSO chemosensitization may be of value for certain patients and that screening assays may help identify treatment-sensitive individuals.

Misonidazole and CCNU chemotherapy for recurrent primary brain tumor.

CCNU chemotherapy prolongs survival of patients with primary brain tumor when given at the time of tumor progression following radiation therapy. Used as single agent, response rates of 30 to 80 per cent have been reported with median response durations of five to six months. Experimentally, tumor cytotoxicity is enhanced using the combination of misonidazole and CCNU, without increasing myelotoxicity. In this phase I/II study, 23 patients with primary brain tumor which progressed following radiation therapy were treated with combined CCNU and misonidazole. In all patients either the diagnosis of high grade glioma was made at the time of initial diagnosis prior to radiation therapy or the tumor transformed from low grade to high grade glioma at the time of progression following radiation therapy. CCNU 120 mg/M2 was given four hours following misonidazole 3.5 g/M2 every six weeks, with dosage adjustments for myelotoxicity. Treatment was continued for one year or until tumor progression. Of the 17 patients in the study for one year or more, 11 (65 per cent) survived for one year, and six (35 per cent) remained free of tumor progression for one year. Median time to tumor progression from start of CCNU plus misonidazole chemotherapy was 27 weeks and median survival was 80 weeks. No severe complications resulted from myelotoxicity. One patient developed mild peripheral neuropathy which disappeared following discontinuation of misonidazole.

Misonidazole combined with hyperfractionation in the management of malignant glioma.

Multiple daily fractionated radiation therapy (MDF) may be more effective than conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CF) in the treatment of malignant glioma. The hypoxic cell sensitizer misonidazole (MISO) could be more effective when employed with small fractions of radiation every 4 hours to take advantage of the long half-life of the drug. To evaluate MDF and MDF in combination with MISO, a randomized prospective trial was initiated. Between January 1981, and December 1982, patients with histologically verified astrocytoma with anaplastic foci or glioblastoma multiforme were randomized to CF (5800 cGy, 30 fractions, 6 weeks), MDF (6141 cGy, 69 fractions, 4 1/2 weeks, at 89 cGy every 4 hours 3 times daily) and MDF in combination with MISO (1.25 gm/M2 three times weekly for the first 3 weeks). In January 1983, the CF arm was dropped and a high dose MDF arm added (7120 cGy, 80 fractions, 5 1/2 weeks, at 89 cGy per fraction every 4 hours 3 times daily). CCNU chemotherapy was given at the time of tumor progression. One hundred and twenty-eight patients were evaluated (38 CF, 42 MDF, 37 MDF plus MISO, and 11 high dose MDF). Median survival was 29 weeks for CF, 45 weeks for MDF and 50 weeks for MDF plus MISO. Survival was significantly improved for patients treated with MDF compared to patients treated with CF (p less than .002). The addition of MISO to MDF did not result in further improvement in survival. Acute toxicity was acceptable. No clinically apparent delayed toxicity was observed.

Misonidazole with dexamethasone rescue: an escalating dose toxicity study.

Neurotoxicity induced by misonidazole (MISO) and desmethylmisonidazole (DMM) has become the dose limiting factor in clinical work. In 1981, we reported a preliminary study suggestive that Dexamethasone (DEXA) does have a protective effect against peripheral neuropathies (PN) resulting from toxicity of misonidazole. Furthermore, in that study we have observed that DEXA did not alter the plasma pharmacokinetics of misonidazole. We are presently investigating the use of DEXA (2 mg t.i.d. during treatment), with escalating doses of MISO in an attempt to modify its neurotoxicity. To date, 16 patients have been registered to receive total doses of MISO ranging from 13.5 to 17.5 gm/M2 given in 9 equally divided doses over 3 weeks. DEXA, 2 mg t.i.d. is given 3 days prior to the first dose and continues for the duration of therapy. All patients receive palliative radiation. No toxicity was seen at the total dose of 13.5 gm/M2. One grade I PN occurred in the first four patients receiving 15.5 gm/M2. Six additional patients were entered at this dose level and no further incidence of PN was observed. Patients are being entered at the next step of 17.5 gm/M2.

Polyamine levels in CSF from patients with pituitary tumors or nonneoplastic pituitary disease.

Cerebrospinal fluid polyamine determinations were performed in 21 patients harboring pituitary tumors and six patients with nonneoplastic pituitary disease. Although CSF putrescine levels were significantly elevated in some patients harboring tumors, other patients showed no elevation. Polyamine levels did not correlate with tumor size, as assessed by the presence or absence of suprasellar extension. Data on patients harboring nonneoplastic pituitary disease were variable. Compared with other findings from this laboratory on the use of polyamine levels for the diagnosis and management of other brain tumors, these findings suggest that CSF polyamine levels will not have a significant diagnostic role in the treatment of patients suspected to have pituitary disease.

Chemotherapy of pediatric brain-stem tumors.

Forty-five children harboring brain-stem tumors were treated at the University of California, San Francisco, between 1969 and 1979. Pathological diagnoses were made in 19 patients. All patients received radiation therapy (RT). Thirteen patients received chemotherapy before, during, or immediately after RT. Twenty-four patients were treated with chemotherapy at the time of tumor progression, after initial treatment with RT alone. No statistically significant difference in time to tumor progression or survival was found for treatment with chemotherapy as an adjuvant to RT compared to treatment with RT alone followed by chemotherapy administered at the time of tumor progression. There were, however, more long-term survivors in the group that was first treated with chemotherapy at the time of tumor progression. There was no statistically significant correlation between survival and tumor pathology or location, although there were more long-term survivors among patients harboring low-grade gliomas and among patients with tumors confined to the midbrain. The authors documented the response of some brain-stem tumors to chemotherapy; however, cooperative controlled studies will be required to determine the optimum treatment for this disease.

Cerebrospinal fluid polyamines in patients with Glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma.

Eighteen cerebrospinal fluid polyamine determinations in 12 patients with glioblastoma multiforme and 76 determinations in 37 patients with anaplastic astrocytoma were evaluated. Cerebrospinal fluid polyamine levels showed no significant relationship to the degree of malignancy or to enhanced tumor volume or volume of tumor central low density as determined by contrast-enhanced computerized tomography. A significant correlation was found between polyamine levels and the proximity of the tumor to the cerebral ventricles. Polyamine levels were correlated with clinical status as determined by neurological examination, radionuclide scan, and computerized tomography. Compared with those of stable patients, cerebrospinal fluid polyamine levels were significantly elevated in patients with recurrent tumors; however, elevation of polyamine levels did not appear to precede tumor recurrence. A large fraction of the results were false-positive or false-negative results. In contrast to our findings in patients with medulloblastoma, it appears that cerebrospinal fluid polyamine levels determinations may be of little use for monitoring tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma.

Supportive management of the patient with malignant brain tumor.

Primary brain tumors constitute nearly 10% of nontraumatic neurological diseases. The incidence of metastatic tumors is increasing and will continue to increase as therapeutic improvements prolong survival. Sooner or later, most of these patients will have major neurological disabilities. The management of the most common of these disabilities, including the care of bedridden or comatose patients, is discussed, along with consideration of the role of the family in caring for the patient's physical and psychological needs.