Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 45(4): 666-673, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32250474

ABSTRACT

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The effects of the body size condition (overweight and underweight) on the outcome of antirheumatic drugs are unclear. The aim of this study was to elucidate the relationship between body size and treatment outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biological antirheumatic drugs. METHODS: A retrospective observational descriptive study was conducted at Tokyo Women's Medical University, Medical Center East, from June 2015 to May 2018. Primary and secondary outcomes were defined as antirheumatic treatment ineffectiveness and antirheumatic treatment discontinuation due to any side effects, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for the outcomes and to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 297 patients were included. Primary and secondary outcomes were observed in 42 (14%) and 11 (4%) of the patients, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 (OR = 4.22, 95% CI; 1.69-10.5, P = .002) was associated with rheumatoid arthritis treatment ineffectiveness and that BMI <18.5 kg/m2 (OR = 5.87, 95% CI; 1.25-27.5, P = .025) and tacrolimus use (OR = 9.06, 95% CI; 1.37-60.1, P = .022) were associated with antirheumatic treatment discontinuation due to any side effects. The cut-off dose for tacrolimus was 0.5 mg/day. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Overweight affects antirheumatic drug efficacy. Underweight and tacrolimus use increased the discontinuation of antirheumatic drugs due to side effects. A validation study is needed to confirm the reliability of these results.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/physiopathology , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Overweight/physiopathology , Thinness/physiopathology , Aged , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Remission Induction/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Tokyo , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 12(8): 774-776, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32034105

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop a nicardipine prolonged-release implant (NPRI) to prevent cerebral vasospasm in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage in 1999, which may be used during craniotomy, and report the results of our recent 12-year single critical care center experience. METHODS: Of 432 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treated between 2007 and 2019, 291 were enrolled. 97 Patients were aged >70 years (33%), 194 were female (67%), 138 were World Federation of Neurological Societies grades 1, 2, and 3 (47%), 218 were Fisher group 3 (75%), and 243 had an anterior circulation aneurysm (84%). Using a propensity score matching method for these five factors, the severity of cerebral vasospasm, occurrence of delayed cerebral infarction, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred patients each with or without NPRI were selected, and the ratios of coil/clip were 0/100 and 88/12, respectively. Cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral infarction were both significantly less common in the NPRI group (p=0.004, OR=0.412 (95% CI 0.223 to 0.760) and p=0.005, OR=0.272 (95% CI 0.103 to 0.714, respectively); a significant difference was seen in the mRS score at discharge by Fisher's exact test (p=0.0025). A mRS score of 6 (dead) was less common in the group with NPRI, and mRS scores of 0 and 1 were also less common. No side effects were seen. CONCLUSIONS: NPRIs significantly reduced the occurrence of cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral infraction without any side effects. The NPRI and non-NPRI groups showed different patterns of short-term outcomes in the single critical care center, which might have been due to selection bias and patient characteristics. Differences in outcomes may become clear in comparisons with patients treated by craniotomy.


Subject(s)
Nicardipine/therapeutic use , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cerebral Infarction , Critical Care , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Propensity Score , Prostheses and Implants , Treatment Outcome , Vasospasm, Intracranial/drug therapy , Vasospasm, Intracranial/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...