Perineal reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection: Comprehensive review of the literature.

Abdominoperineal resection (APR) in patients with anorectal carcinomas may involve flap-based perineal reconstruction techniques, such as rectus abdominis, myocutaneous, gracilis, and gluteal flaps. There is no consensus on the optimal approach. We evaluated the outcomes of perineal reconstruction following APR in the literature and identified a predominance of abdominal-based approaches, though overall outcomes were similar compared with thigh or perineal-based options. Statistical power to detect small differences in outcomes is limited, however, due to the retrospective design, relatively short-term follow-up, and potential selection bias based on morbidities associated with reconstructive techniques. Lacking randomized studies to define optimum approaches to perineal reconstruction, clinicians should individualize surgical strategy.

Does the timing of postoperative showering impact infection rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Optimum timing of postoperative showering varies. Earlier showering improves patient satisfaction, but the impact of the timing of showering on postoperative infection is unclear. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of various postoperative showering practices. METHODS: We searched PubMed to identify relevant human clinical studies in English, and searched these for additional references. Articles were reviewed for patient demographics, surgical specialty and procedure, wound closure method, placement of drains, showering protocol, and rates of infection and complications. Only randomized controlled trials were analyzed. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to determine overall infection and complication rates between patients allowed to shower within the first 48 h postoperatively or later. RESULTS: Out of 357 studies, seven and five were included in the infection and complications rate meta-analyses, respectively. A total of 1,881 and 958 patients were included in each analysis; 605 and 477 patients in each analysis were allowed to shower on or before postoperative day 2 ("early"), while the remainder were prohibited from showering until postoperative day 3 to beyond one week ("delayed") postoperatively. There was no difference in infection (p = 0.45, [-0.0052, 2 × 0.007 95% CI]) or complication rate (p = 0.36, [-0.0046, 2 × 0.005 95% CI]) with earlier vs. delayed showering protocols. CONCLUSION: Published literature demonstrates no increase in the overall rate of wound infections or complications when patients showered earlier in the postoperative period. Additional randomized studies are needed to determine the ideal time for postoperative showering. These data should be considered by surgeons while determining when to permit patients to shower after surgery.

Innovations in the Plastic Surgery Care Pathway: Using Telemedicine for Clinical Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine delivers clinical information and permits discussion between providers and patients at a distance. Postoperative visits may be a burden to patients-many of whom travel long distances and miss work opportunities. By implementing a telehealth opportunity, the authors sought to develop a process that optimizes efficiency and provides optimal patient satisfaction. METHODS: Using quality improvement methods that have been highly effective in the business sector, we developed a testable workflow for patients in the postoperative telehealth setting. Seventy-two patients were enrolled and surveyed. A preoperative survey sought to determine travel distance, comfort with technology, access to the Internet and video-enabled devices, and the patient's interest in telehealth. A postoperative survey focused on patient satisfaction with the experience. RESULTS: Using the Lean Six Sigma methodology, the authors developed a telehealth workflow to optimize clinical efficiency. Preoperative surveys revealed that the majority (73 percent) of patients preferred in-person follow-up visits in the clinic. However, the postoperative survey distributed after the telehealth encounter found that nearly 100 percent of patients were satisfied with the telehealth experience. Ninety-six percent of patients said that their questions were answered, and 97 percent of patients stated that they would use telehealth again in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth encounters enable real-time clinical decision-making by providing patients and visiting nurses access to providers and decreasing patient transportation needs and wait times. Although initially hesitant to opt for a telehealth encounter in lieu of a traditional visit, the great majority of patients voiced satisfaction with the telehealth experience. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

The Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Wound Healing in Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Although diabetes mellitus (DM) is a known risk factor for surgical complications in general, there is little published evidence to establish such an effect among patients undergoing breast reconstruction (BR). The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of DM on complications in patients undergoing postmastectomy BR. METHODS: Patients who underwent BR at our institution from November 2002 to November 2012 were identified. Clinical and demographic data of patients with type 1 or type 2 DM were reviewed. Complications occurring within 60 days of surgery were compared between diabetic and nondiabetic patients for both autologous and nonautologous reconstruction types. RESULTS: A total of 1371 BR were performed in 1035 patients. There were 877 (64.0%) autologous reconstructions and 494 (36.0%) implant-based reconstructions. Patients with DM (n = 64) had significantly higher preoperative blood glucose levels (137.5 vs 100.1, P < 0.05). Postoperatively, DM patients reconstructed with implants had a significantly higher incidence of delayed wound healing (22.2% vs 9.7%; P = 0.04). This was not observed in patients with DM reconstructed with autologous tissue (7.4% vs 6.6%; P = 0.70). Diabetic patients had a significantly higher incidence of hypertension and were older than nondiabetic patients. To control for these variables and other potential confounders, multiple logistic regression analysis was performed. Again, diabetic patients had a significantly higher incidence of delayed wound healing following implant-based reconstruction (odds ratio, 2.52, 95% confidence interval = 1.2-6.2) but not autologous reconstruction (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval = 0.2-4.6). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes heightens the risk of wound healing complications among patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction.

Direct binding of GTP cyclohydrolase and tyrosine hydroxylase: regulatory interactions between key enzymes in dopamine biosynthesis.

The signaling functions of dopamine require a finely tuned regulatory network for rapid induction and suppression of output. A key target of regulation is the enzyme tyrosine hydroxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme in dopamine synthesis, which is activated by phosphorylation and modulated by the availability of its cofactor, tetrahydrobiopterin. The first enzyme in the cofactor synthesis pathway, GTP cyclohydrolase I, is activated by phosphorylation and inhibited by tetrahydrobiopterin. We previously reported that deficits in GTP cyclohydrolase activity in Drosophila heterozygous for mutant alleles of the gene encoding this enzyme led to tightly corresponding diminution of in vivo tyrosine hydroxylase activity that could not be rescued by exogenous cofactor. We also found that the two enzymes could be coimmunoprecipitated from tissue extracts and proposed functional interactions between the enzymes that extended beyond provision of cofactor by one pathway for another. Here, we confirm the physical association of these enzymes, identifying interacting regions in both, and we demonstrate that their association can be regulated by phosphorylation. The functional consequences of the interaction include an increase in GTP cyclohydrolase activity, with concomitant protection from end-product feedback inhibition. In vivo, this effect would in turn provide sufficient cofactor when demand for catecholamine synthesis is greatest. The activity of tyrosine hydroxylase is also increased by this interaction, in excess of the stimulation resulting from phosphorylation alone. Vmax is elevated, with no change in Km. These results demonstrate that these enzymes engage in mutual positive regulation.

A typical N-terminal extensions confer novel regulatory properties on GTP cyclohydrolase isoforms in Drosophila melanogaster.

The cofactor tetrahydrobiopterin plays critical roles in the modulation of the signaling molecules dopamine, serotonin, and nitric oxide. Deficits in cofactor synthesis have been associated with several human hereditary diseases. Responsibility for the regulation of cofactor pools resides with the first enzyme in its biosynthetic pathway, GTP cyclohydrolase I. Because organisms must be able to rapidly respond to environmental and developmental cues to adjust output of these signaling molecules, complex regulatory mechanisms are vital for signal modulation. Mammalian GTP cyclohydrolase is subject to end-product inhibition via an associated regulatory protein and to positive regulation via phosphorylation, although target residues are unknown. GTP cyclohydrolase is composed of a highly conserved homodecameric catalytic core and non-conserved N-terminal domains proposed to be regulatory sites. We demonstrate for the first time in any organism that the N-terminal arms of the protein serve regulatory functions. We identify two different modes of regulation of the enzyme mediated through the N-terminal domains. The first is end-product feedback inhibition, catalytically similar to that of the mammalian enzyme, except that feedback inhibition by the cofactor requires sequences in the N-terminal arms rather than a separate regulatory protein. The second is a novel inhibitory interaction between the N-terminal arms and the active sites, which can be alleviated through the phosphorylation of serine residues within the N termini. Both mechanisms allow for acute and highly responsive regulation of cofactor production as required by downstream signaling pathways.