ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In patients with noncirrhotic chronic extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO), data on the morbimortality of abdominal surgery are scarce. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 76 patients (78 interventions) with EHPVO undergoing abdominal surgery within the Vascular Disease Interest Group network. Fourteen percent of the patients had ≥1 major bleeding (unrelated to portal hypertension) and 21% had ≥1 Dindo-Clavien grade ≥3 postoperative complications within 1 month after surgery. Fifteen percent had ≥1 portal hypertension-related complication within 3 months after surgery. Three patients died within 12 months after surgery. An unfavorable outcome (ie, ≥1 abovementioned complication or death) occurred in 37% of the patients and was associated with a history of ascites and with nonwall, noncholecystectomy surgical intervention: 17% of the patients with none of these features had an unfavorable outcome, versus 48% and 100% when one or both features were present, respectively. We then compared 63/76 patients with EHPVO with 126 matched (2:1) control patients without EHPVO but with similar surgical interventions. As compared with control patients, the incidence of major bleeding ( p <0.001) and portal hypertension-related complication ( p <0.001) was significantly higher in patients with EHPVO, but not that of grade ≥3 postoperative complications nor of death. The incidence of unfavorable postoperative outcomes was significantly higher in patients with EHPVO than in those without (33% vs. 18%, p =0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EHPVO are at high risk of major perioperative or postoperative bleeding and postoperative complications, especially in those with ascites or undergoing surgery other than wall surgery or cholecystectomy.
ABSTRACT
The prognosis for oligometastatic colorectal cancer has improved in recent years, mostly because of recent advances in new techniques and approaches to the treatment of oligometastases, including new surgical procedures, better systemic treatments, percutaneous ablation, and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). There are several factors to consider when deciding on the better approach for each patient: tumor factors (metachronous or synchronous metastases, RAS mutation, BRAF mutation, disease-free interval, size and number of metastases), patient factors (age, frailty, comorbidities, patient preferences), and physicians' factors (local expertise). These advances have presented major challenges and opportunities for oncologic multidisciplinary teams to treat patients with limited liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer with a curative intention. In this review, we describe the different treatment options in patients with limited liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer, and the possible combination of three approaches: systemic treatment, surgery, and local ablative treatments.
