Changes in Nasal Tip Aesthetics Over Time Following Asian Tip Plasty.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the sequential postoperative changes in tip aesthetics, by evaluating the aesthetic performance of the septal extension graft with or without tip grafting. METHODS: A total of 62 patients who underwent rhinoplasty with tip plasty were included. Using a three-dimensional scanner, we measured anthropometric aesthetic features of the nasal tip, including tip height, tip width, nasolabial angle, and columellar lobular angle. Preoperative and 1-month and 12-month postoperative anthropometric parameters were compared. The patients were grouped according to surgical techniques (i.e., septal extension only and septal extension plus tip grafting groups) and subtype of tip graft. RESULTS: The 1-month postoperative values of all four aesthetic features were significantly increased compared with the preoperative values. The tip height, tip width, and nasolabial angle at 12 months were significantly decreased compared with 1 month post-operation values, whereas the tip height and width were still greater than the preoperative values. No difference was found between 1 and 12 month values of columellar lobular angle. There were no differences in the degree of decrease in tip height, tip width, nasolabial angle, and columellar lobular angle between the septal extension graft only and septal extension graft plus tip graft groups. There were no differences in the tip graft by subtypes, single- and multi-layer tip grafts. CONCLUSIONS: Increased tip height, tip width, and widened nasolabial angle gained immediately after septal extension grafting surgery gradually decreased over the year regardless of addition of tip graft or tip grafting methods. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:678-683, 2024.

Aesthetic Outcomes of Rhinoplasty Performed in the Early Posttrauma Period after Nasal Bone Fracture.

The optimal timing of rhinoplasty for patients with nasal bone fractures remains controversial. We investigated whether the timing of rhinoplasty after nasal trauma affects the aesthetic outcome of the procedure. A total of 41 adult patients with nasal bone fractures who underwent rhinoplasty between 2006 and 2021 were enrolled in this study. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to indicate the assessor's satisfaction with the surgical outcome after a comparison of the pre- and postoperative facial photographs of each patient. Of the 41 patients, 28 underwent rhinoplasty within 14 days after nasal trauma (early rhinoplasty group), whereas 13 underwent rhinoplasty more than 14 days after nasal trauma (late rhinoplasty group). The rate of receiving spreader and shield graft was higher in the late rhinoplasty group (p = 0.043 and 0.018, respectively). Patients with type IV or V nasal bone fracture and patients with preoperative saddle noses had higher VAS scores than those with types I to III fractures and those without preoperative saddle nose (p = 0.003 and 0.020, respectively). There was no significant difference in overall aesthetic outcome between the early and late rhinoplasty groups. Both groups achieved significantly better radix height, dorsal height, and tip projection after rhinoplasty. The aesthetic outcome of rhinoplasty performed in the early posttrauma period is comparable with that of rhinoplasty performed more than 2 weeks after nasal bone fracture. Rhinoplasty can be considered a safe surgical treatment option for nasal bone fracture, even in the early posttrauma period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : 4.

Revision Rhinoplasty Using Glued Diced Costal Cartilage Shaped With Mold for Management of Complicated Silicone Rhinoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Complicated silicone nose is a common clinical problem. Selection of replacement material for revision dorsal augmentation is a challenging task. OBJECTIVES: The authors presented their experience in the use of molded glued diced cartilage graft (GDCG) for revision rhinoplasty in patients who had complicated silicone augmentation. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of the medical records of 28 patients who underwent silicone implant removal and revision dorsal augmentation with costal cartilage at a tertiary center between February 1, 2018, and February 28, 2022. Patient demographics, surgical technique, anthropometric measurements, and complication data were retrieved and analyzed. Aesthetic outcome scoring and anthropometric measurements were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (9 males and 19 females) who underwent revision rhinoplasty with augmentation were reviewed. The principal indication for revision was cosmetic dissatisfaction. Mean postoperative follow-up duration was 18.3 months. All patients had revision dorsal augmentation with molded GDCG. Other key surgical techniques include the use of caudal septal extension and extended spreader and tip grafts. The majority of the patients were judged to have good or excellent outcomes (91.1%). There were significant percentage increases in dorsal height, radix height, nasal length, and nasal tip projection (2.78%, 2.26%, 7.53%, and 2.40%, respectively; P < .05) and reduction of nasal axis deviation of 1.15° (P < .05) postoperatively. Two patients had postoperative complications, including infection and cosmetic dissatisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Revision rhinoplasty following unsuccessful silicone augmentation is commonly encountered in the Asian population. Molded GDCG for revision dorsal augmentation is a reliable option that delivers good to excellent aesthetic outcomes with acceptable complication rates.