ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 outbreaks in residential care homes for the elderly (RCHEs) and for persons with disability (RCHDs) have caused significant morbidity and mortality during 5th epidemic in Hong Kong. This article reviewed COVID-19 outbreaks situation and estimated the effectiveness of receiving at least two-dose of COVID-19 vaccine in preventing severe outcomes. Methods: To estimate attack rates and vaccination coverage, documentation on COVID-19 infection and their vaccination records of residential care homes (RCH) residents reported between December 31, 2021 and May 31, 2022 were reviewed, and infected cases were follow-up for 4 weeks for severe outcomes or death. Correlation between vaccination coverage against attack rate by types of homes was examined. Infected RCH residents with available information were included in the analysis of vaccine effectiveness against severe outcomes and death. Results: COVID-19 vaccination coverage was low in RCHDs (median 0.46, IQR: 0.24-0.76) and very low in RCHEs (median 0.08, IQR: 0.00-0.19). Higher attack rates were recorded among RCHE residents (median 0.84, IQR: 0.64-0.93) and higher case fatality rate (CFR: 28.1%) than in RCHDs (median 0.58, IQR: 0.31-0.84; CFR: 3.9%). The attack rate decreased when vaccination coverage increased for both RCHEs (ρ = -0.131, p < 0.001) and RCHDs (ρ = -0.333, p < 0.001). Comparing with infected residents who were unvaccinated/vaccinated with one-dose, receiving at least two-dose was estimated to be effective in reducing severe outcomes in 31% and 36% of infected RCHE and RCHD residents respectively; with greater reduction in mortality among RCHD than RCHE residents (54% and 38%, respectively). Vaccine effectiveness of two-dose of BNT162b2 against severe outcomes and death are higher than that of CoronaVac. Conclusions: Increasing COVID-19 vaccination could have significant impact on reducing the risk of COVID-19 outbreaks in RCHs. At least two-dose of COVID-19 vaccine is still effective in reducing severe outcomes and death among infected residents in RCHs during Omicron epidemic.
ABSTRACT
Cancer-related mortality of solid tumors remains the major cause of death worldwide. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) released from cancer cells harbors specific somatic mutations. Sequencing ctDNA opens opportunities to non-invasive population screening and lays foundations for personalized therapy. In this study, two commercially available platforms, Roche's Avenio ctDNA Expanded panel and QIAgen's QIAseq Human Comprehensive Cancer panel were compared for (1) panel coverage of clinically relevant variants; (2) target enrichment specificity and sequencing performance; (3) the sensitivity; (4) concordance and (5) sequencing coverage using the same human blood sample with ultra-deep next-generation sequencing. Our finding suggests that Avenio detected somatic mutations in common cancers in over 70% of patients while QIAseq covered nearly 90% with a higher average number of variants per patient (Avenio: 3; QIAseq: 8 variants per patient). Both panels demonstrated similar on-target rate and percentage of reads mapped. However, Avenio had more uniform sequencing coverage across regions with different GC content. Avenio had a higher sensitivity and concordance compared with QIAseq at the same sequencing depth. This study identifies a unique niche for the application of each of the panel and allows the scientific community to make an informed decision on the technologies to meet research or application needs.
