ABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: A sufficient supply of safe, high-quality blood components for transfusion is essential to the healthcare system in Germany. The requirements for the current reporting system are laid down in the German Transfusion Act. The present work elaborates on the advantages and limitations of the current reporting system and investigates the feasibility of a pilot project that collects specific data on blood supply based on weekly reports. Materials and Methods: Selected data on blood collection and supply from 2009 to 2021 derived from the §21 German Transfusion Act database were examined. In addition, a pilot study over a period of 12 months was conducted on a voluntary basis. The number of red blood cell (RBC) concentrates was documented and stock availability was calculated weekly. Results: From 2009 to 2021, the annual number of RBC concentrates decreased from 4.68 to 3.43 million, the per capita distribution decreased from 58 to 41 RBC concentrates per 1,000 inhabitants. These figures did not change significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The data of the 1-year pilot project represented 77% of the released RBC concentrates in Germany. Percentage share of O RhD positive RBC concentrates fluctuated between 35% and 22% and for O RhD negative concentrates between 17% and 5%. The availability of O RhD positive RBC concentrate stocks varied between 2.1 and 7.6 days. Conclusion: The data presented shows a decrease in annual RBC concentrate sales over an 11-year period and no further change over the past 2 years. A weekly monitoring of blood components detects acute problems in RBC provision and supply. Close monitoring seems helpful but should be combined with a nationwide supply strategy.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Following the first assessment of the effects of safety measures taken against transfusion-transmitted bacterial infections (TTBI), the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) decided to newly analyze risk minimization measures (RMM) using German hemovigilance data from 2011 to 2020, focusing on blood components, recipients, and bacterial strains. Materials and Methods: The PEI assessed the imputability of all reported serious adverse reactions (SAR) relying mainly on microbiological test results. Reporting rates (RR) of suspected, confirmed, and fatal confirmed TTBI were calculated and compared to the previous reporting 10-year period (2001-2010) using Poisson regression to estimate RR ratios (RRR). Furthermore, details on blood component age, patients' medical history, and bacterial pathogenicity were collected. Results: With respect to the previous 10-year period, the number of suspected TTBI increased (n = 403), while fewer cases were confirmed (n = 40); the number of deaths remained more or less unchanged (n = 8). The RR for suspected TTBI were 7.9, 18.7, and 1.6 cases per million units transfused for red blood cells (RBC), platelet concentrates (PC), and fresh frozen plasma (FFP), respectively. RRR showed a statistically significant 2.5-fold increase in the RR for suspected TTBI after RBC administration from 2001-2010 to the period under review (p < 0.0001). The RR for confirmed TTBI were 0.4, 5.0, and 0.0 cases per million units transfused for RBC, PC, and FFP, respectively. Compared to the period 2001-2010, there was a statistically significant decrease in the RR of confirmed TTBI by half for PC (p = 0.0052). The RR for confirmed PC-caused TTBI with fatal outcome was 1.4 cases per million units transfused. Regardless of type of blood product transfused and outcome of SAR, the majority of TTBI occurred after administration of a product at the end of shelf life (40.0%) and to recipients of advanced age (median age: 68.5 years) and/or with severe immunosuppression (72.5%) due to decreased myelopoiesis (62.5%). 72.5% of the involved bacteria had a middle/high human pathogenicity. Conclusion: Despite a significant decrease in confirmed TTBI following PC transfusion in Germany after implementation of RMM, the current manufacture of blood products can still not prevent TTBI with fatal outcomes. As demonstrated in various countries, RMM like bacterial screening or pathogen reduction may measurably improve the safety of blood transfusion.
ABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: In 1993, a quarantine storage of 6 months was introduced for plasma for transfusion and was reduced to 4 months in 2003, owing to the improvements of screening assays used in German blood establishments. The presented survey analyses the value of quarantine storage under the current screening conditions. Materials and Methods: From 2015 to 2019, we collected data on the total amount of released quarantine plasma as well as on the number of quarantine plasma not released due to a reactive screening test of a follow-up donation. Results: Responding establishments covered 84% of plasma units released within the sampled period. In 3,583,913 (99.98%) of the total 3,584,664 test pairs, all screening assays revealed a negative result, leading to plasma release from quarantine storage. In 442 out of the residual 751 cases, confirmed positive results for human immunodeficiency virus (24), hepatitis C virus (22), or hepatitis B virus (396) were obtained in the follow-up donations. Of them, 372 revealed negative ID-NAT results in their retain samples confirmed by using highly sensitive individual donor nucleic acid amplification technology. In 70 cases, no testing of retain samples was performed as plasma was released for fractionation. The maximum theoretical risk for an undetected human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C or B virus infection was less than 0.0001%. Conclusion: No positive donation were found under the current screening regime and the quarantine storage during the 5-year survey period. In view of the current type and sensitivity of screening tests in German blood establishments, the results allow a reassessment of the value of quarantine storage of plasma regarding duration and release modalities. Due to the more sensitive donor screening, shorter quarantine periods as well as dispensing quarantine storage can be discussed. A reduction in the safety standard of plasma transfusions need not be feared, and the availability of plasma for transfusions could be facilitated.
