A randomized placebo-controlled trial of desipramine, cognitive behavioral therapy, and active placebo therapy for low back pain.

This clinical trial evaluated the independent and combined effects of a tricyclic antidepressant (desipramine) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic back pain relative to an active placebo treatment. Participants (n = 142) were patients experiencing daily chronic back pain at an intensity of ≥4/10 who were randomized to a single-center, double-blind, 12-week, 4-arm, parallel groups controlled clinical trial of (1) low concentration desipramine titrated to reach a serum concentration level of 15 to 65 ng/mL; (2) CBT and active placebo medication (benztropine mesylate, 0.125 mg); (3) low concentration desipramine and CBT; and (4) active benztropine placebo medication. Participants completed the Differential Description Scale and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaires before and after treatment as validated measures of outcomes in back pain intensity and disability, respectively. Participants within each condition showed significant reductions from pre-treatment to post-treatment in pain intensity (mean changes ranged from = -2.58 to 3.87, Cohen's d's = 0.46-0.84) and improvements in pain disability (mean changes = -3.04 to 4.29, Cohen's d's = 0.54-0.88). However, intent-to-treat analyses at post-treatment showed no significant differences between any condition, with small effect sizes ranging from 0.06 to 0.27. The results from this clinical trial did not support the hypothesis that desipramine, CBT, or their combination would be statistically superior to an active medicine placebo for reducing chronic back pain intensity or disability. Key limitations included recruiting 71% of the planned sample size and use of multiple inclusion/exclusion criteria that may limit generalizability to broader populations of patients with chronic back pain.

A randomized controlled trial of gabapentin for chronic low back pain with and without a radiating component.

Gabapentin is prescribed for analgesia in chronic low back pain, yet there are no controlled trials supporting this practice. This randomized, 2-arm, 12-week, parallel group study compared gabapentin (forced titration up to 3600 mg daily) with inert placebo. The primary efficacy measure was change in pain intensity from baseline to the last week on treatment measured by the Descriptor Differential Scale; the secondary outcome was disability (Oswestry Disability Index). The intention-to-treat analysis comprised 108 randomized patients with chronic back pain (daily pain for ≥6 months) whose pain did (43%) or did not radiate into the lower extremity. Random effects regression models which did not impute missing scores were used to analyze outcome data. Pain intensity decreased significantly over time (P < 0.0001) with subjects on gabapentin or placebo, reporting reductions of about 30% from baseline, but did not differ significantly between groups (P = 0.423). The same results pertained for disability scores. In responder analyses of those who completed 12 weeks (N = 72), the proportion reporting at least 30% or 50% reduction in pain intensity, or at least "Minimal Improvement" on the Physician Clinical Global Impression of Change did not differ significantly between groups. There were no significant differences in analgesia between participants with radiating (n = 46) and nonradiating (n = 62) pain either within or between treatment arms. There was no significant correlation between gabapentin plasma concentration and pain intensity. Gabapentin appears to be ineffective for analgesia in chronic low back pain with or without a radiating component.

Pancreastatin: multiple actions on human intermediary metabolism in vivo, variation in disease, and naturally occurring functional genetic polymorphism.

RATIONALE: The chromogranin A (CHGA) fragment pancreastatin (human CHGA250-301) impairs glucose metabolism, but the role of human pancreastatin in vivo remains unexplored. METHODS: We studied brachial arterial infusion of pancreastatin (CHGA273-301-amide at approximately 200 nm) on forearm metabolism of glucose, free fatty acids, and amino acids. Plasma pancreastatin was measured in obesity or type 2 diabetes. Systematic discovery of amino acid variation was performed, and the potency of one variant in the active carboxyl terminus (Gly297Ser) was tested. RESULTS: Pancreastatin decreased glucose uptake by approximately 48-50%; the lack of change in forearm plasma flow indicated a metabolic, rather than hemodynamic, mechanism. A control CHGA peptide (catestatin, CHGA352-372) did not affect glucose. Insulin increased glucose uptake, but pancreastatin did not antagonize this action. Pancreastatin increased spillover of free fatty acids by about 4.5- to 6.4-fold, but not spillover of amino acids. Insulin diminished spillover of both free fatty acids and amino acids, but these actions were not reversed by pancreastatin. Plasma pancreastatin was elevated approximately 3.7-fold in diabetes, but was unchanged during weight loss. Proteolytic cleavage sites for pancreastatin in vivo were documented by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization/time of flight mass spectrometry. Three pancreastatin variants were discovered: Arg253Trp, Ala256Gly, and Gly297Ser. The Gly297Ser variant had unexpectedly increased potency to inhibit glucose uptake. CONCLUSIONS: The dysglycemic peptide pancreastatin is specifically and potently active in humans on multiple facets of intermediary metabolism, although it did not antagonize insulin. Pancreastatin is elevated in diabetes, and the variant Gly297Ser had increased potency to inhibit glucose uptake. The importance of human pancreastatin in vivo as well as its natural variants is established.

Human response to alpha2-adrenergic agonist stimulation studied in an isolated vascular bed in vivo: Biphasic influence of dose, age, gender, and receptor genotype.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Activation of alpha 2 -adrenergic receptors regulates a broad spectrum of physiologic responses, including blood pressure (centrally and peripherally), sedation, analgesia, insulin release, renal function, cognition, and behavior. The purpose of this study was to explore systematically the local vascular responses in humans triggered by a highly selective alpha 2 -adrenergic agonist (azepexole [B-HT 933]) and whether such responses are dose-dependent or influenced by age, gender, or allelic variation at the drug's receptor. METHODS: We evaluated dorsal hand vein vascular responses to the infusion of a wide spectrum of doses of azepexole, assessing any venodilation, as well as the maximal extent of venoconstriction (B max ) and the dose that produced a half-maximal effect (K d ), in 50 healthy normotensive adults of both genders and 4 ethnicities. Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid from the study subjects was evaluated at polymorphisms of the alpha 2B -adrenergic receptor gene (ADRA2B). RESULTS: We found previously unreported initial venodilation to low doses (10-100 ng/min) of azepexole, followed by progressive, intense venoconstriction to higher doses (200-100,000 ng/min) of the drug. Younger individuals (aged <30 years) had less venodilation than older individuals (aged >30 years) with low doses of azepexole but had a greater extent of venoconstriction at higher doses of azepexole (ANOVA, P = .001). Men had less venodilation than women with low doses of azepexole but greater venoconstriction with higher doses (ANOVA, P = .036). Several common polymorphisms (>10% minor allele frequency) at ADRA2B (insertion/deletion polymorphism [Glu 322-325 ], G-98C, C1182A, and C1776A) did not show an association with either B max or K d for the drug response. The A36G (Thr12Thr) synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism displayed a nonsignificant trend (P = .073) toward higher K d in A/G heterozygotes compared with A/A homozygotes. CONCLUSIONS: Local infusion into the human dorsal hand vein of a highly selective alpha 2 -adrenergic agonist, azepexole, produces biphasic responses, with venodilation at a low dose and intense venoconstriction at a higher concentration. These responses to azepexole show prominent differences as a function of age and gender but appear not to depend on common allelic variations at the ADRA2B receptor.