Human population genetic structure and diversity inferred from polymorphic L1(LINE-1) and Alu insertions.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The L1 retrotransposable element family is the most successful self-replicating genomic parasite of the human genome. L1 elements drive replication of Alu elements, and both have had far-reaching impacts on the human genome. We use L1 and Alu insertion polymorphisms to analyze human population structure. METHODS: We genotyped 75 recent, polymorphic L1 insertions in 317 individuals from 21 populations in sub-Saharan Africa, East Asia, Europe and the Indian subcontinent. This is the first sample of L1 loci large enough to support detailed population genetic inference. We analyzed these data in parallel with a set of 100 polymorphic Alu insertion loci previously genotyped in the same individuals. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The data sets yield congruent results that support the recent African origin model of human ancestry. A genetic clustering algorithm detects clusters of individuals corresponding to continental regions. The number of loci sampled is critical: with fewer than 50 typical loci, structure cannot be reliably discerned in these populations. The inclusion of geographically intermediate populations (from India) reduces the distinctness of clustering. Our results indicate that human genetic variation is neither perfectly correlated with geographic distance (purely clinal) nor independent of distance (purely clustered), but a combination of both: stepped clinal.

The structures of mouse and human L1 elements reflect their insertion mechanism.

L1 is an abundant, interspersed repeated DNA element of mammalian genomes. It has achieved its high copy number via retrotransposition. Like other non-LTR retrotransposons, L1 insertion into chromosomal DNA apparently occurs by target-site primed reverse transcription, or TPRT. L1 retrotransposition often generates elements with 5' truncations that are flanked by a duplication of the genomic target site (TSD). It is typically assumed that the 5' truncated elements are the consequence of poor processivity of the L1 reverse transcriptase. However, we find that the majority of young L1 elements from both the human and mouse genomes are truncated at sequences that can basepair with the target site. Thus, to whatever extent truncation is a consequence of poor processivity, we suggest that truncation is likely to occur when target site sequence can basepair with L1 sequence. This finding supports a model for insertion that occurs by two sequential TPRT reactions, the second of which relies upon the homology between the target site and L1. Because perfect heteroduplex formation is not required for all insertions, a dynamic relationship between the primer, template and enzyme during reverse transcription is inferred. 5' truncation may be a successful evolutionary strategy that is exploited by L1 as a means to escape host suppression of transposition.

The recent evolution of human L1 retrotransposons.

L1 elements are the most successful retrotransposons in mammals and are responsible for at least 30% of human DNA. Far from being indolent genomic parasites, L1 elements have evolved and amplified rapidly during human evolution. Indeed during just the last 25 million years (MY) five distinct L1 families have emerged and generated tens of thousands of copies. The most recently evolved human specific L1 family is currently active and L1 copies have been accumulating in the human genome at about the same rate per generation as the currently active L1 families in Old World rats and mice. At times during the last 25 MY L1 activity constituted a significant enough genetic load to be subject to negative selection. During these same times, and in apparent response to the host, L1 underwent adaptive evolution. Understanding the molecular basis for these evolutionary changes should help illuminate one of the least understood but most important aspects of L1 biology, namely the extent and nature of the interaction between L1 and its host.

Adaptive evolution in LINE-1 retrotransposons.

We traced the sequence evolution of the active lineage of LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposons over the last approximately 25 Myr of human evolution. Five major families (L1PA5, L1PA4, L1PA3B, L1PA2, and L1PA1) of elements have succeeded each other as a single lineage. We found that part of the first open-reading frame (ORFI) had a higher rate of nonsynonymous (amino acid replacement) substitution than synonymous substitution during the evolution of the ancestral L1PA5 through the L1PA3B families. This segment encodes the coiled coil region of the protein-protein interaction domain of the ORFI protein (ORFIp). Statistical analysis of these changes indicates that positive selection had been acting on this region. In contrast, the coiled coil segment hardly changed during the evolution of the L1PA3B to the present L1PA1 family. Therefore, selective pressure on the coiled coil segment has changed over time. We suggest that the fast rate of amino acid replacement in the coiled coil segment reflects the adaptation of L1 either to a changing genomic environment or to host repression factors. In contrast, the second open-reading frame and the nucleic acid-binding domain of the first open-reading frame are extremely well conserved, attesting to the strong purifying selection acting on these regions.

Selection against deleterious LINE-1-containing loci in the human lineage.

We compared sex chromosomal and autosomal regions of similar GC contents and found that the human Y chromosome contains nine times as many full-length (FL) ancestral LINE-1 (L1) elements per megabase as do autosomes and that the X chromosome contains three times as many. In addition, both sex chromosomes contain a ca. twofold excess of elements that are >500 bp but not long enough to be capable of autonomous replication. In contrast, the autosomes are not deficient in short (<500 bp) L1 elements or SINE elements relative to the sex chromosomes. Since neither the Y nor the X chromosome, when present in males, can be cleared of deleterious genetic loci by recombination, we conclude that most FL L1s were deleterious and thus subject to purifying selection. Comparison between nonrecombining and recombining regions of autosome 21 supported this conclusion. We were able to identify a subset of loci in the human DNA database that once contained active L1 elements, and we found by using the polymerase chain reaction that 72% of them no longer contain L1 elements in a representative of each of eight different ethnic groups. Genetic damage produced by both L1 retrotransposition and ectopic (nonallelic) recombination between L1 elements could provide the basis for their negative selection.

L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposon evolution and amplification in recent human history.

L1 (LINE-1) elements constitute a large family of mammalian retrotransposons that have been replicating and evolving in mammals for more than 100 Myr and now compose 20% or more of the DNA of some mammals. Here, we investigated the evolutionary dynamics of the active human Ta L1 family and found that it arose approximately 4 MYA and subsequently differentiated into two major subfamilies, Ta-0 and Ta-1, each of which contain additional subsets. Ta-1, which has not heretofore been described, is younger than Ta-0 and now accounts for at least 50% of the Ta family. Although Ta-0 contains some active elements, the Ta-1 subfamily has replaced it as the replicatively dominant subfamily in humans; 69% of the loci that contain Ta-1 inserts are polymorphic for the presence or absence of the insert in human populations, as compared with 29% of the loci that contain Ta-0 inserts. This value is 90% for loci that contain Ta-1d inserts, which are the youngest subset of Ta-1 and now account for about two thirds of the Ta-1 subfamily. The successive emergence and amplification of distinct Ta L1 subfamilies shows that L1 evolution has been as active in recent human history as it has been found to be for rodent L1 families. In addition, Ta-1 elements have been accumulating in humans at about the same rate per generation as recently evolved active rodent L1 subfamilies.

The biological properties and evolutionary dynamics of mammalian LINE-1 retrotransposons.

Mammalian LINE-1 (L1) elements belong to the superfamily of autonomously replicating retrotransposable elements that lack the long terminal repeated (LTR) sequences typical of retroviruses and retroviral-like retrotransposons. The non-LTR superfamily is very ancient and L1-like elements are ubiquitous in nature, having been found in plants, fungi, invertebrates, and various vertebrate classes from fish to mammals. L1 elements have been replicating and evolving in mammals for at least the past 100 million years and now constitute 20% or more of some mammalian genomes. Therefore, L1 elements presumably have had a profound, perhaps defining, effect on the evolution, structure, and function of mammalian genomes. L1 elements contain regulatory signals and encode two proteins: one is an RNA-binding protein and the second one presumably functions as an integrase-replicase, because it has both endonuclease and reverse transcriptase activities. This work reviews the structure and biological properties of L1 elements, including their regulation, replication, evolution, and interaction with their mammalian hosts. Although each of these processes is incompletely understood, what is known indicates that they represent challenging and fascinating biological phenomena, the resolution of which will be essential for fully understanding the biology of mammals.

Determining and dating recent rodent speciation events by using L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposons.

Phylogenies based on the inheritance of shared derived characters will be ambiguous when the shared characters are not the result of common ancestry. Such characters are called homoplasies. Phylogenetic analysis also can be problematic if the characters have not changed sufficiently, as might be the case for rapid or recent speciations. The latter are of particular interest because evolutionary processes may be more accessible the more recent the speciation. The repeated DNA subfamilies generated by the mammalian L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposon are apparently homoplasy-free phylogenetic characters. L1 retrotransposons are transmitted only by inheritance and rapidly generate novel variants that produce distinct subfamilies of mostly defective copies, which then "age" as they diverge. Here we show that the L1 character can both resolve and date recent speciation events within the large group of very closely related rats known as Rattus sensu stricto. This lineage arose 5-6 million years ago (Mya) and subsequently underwent two episodes of speciation: an intense one, approximately 2.7 Mya, produced at least five lineages in <0.3 My; a second began approximately 1.2 Mya and may still be continuing.

Rapid evolution of a young L1 (LINE-1) clade in recently speciated Rattus taxa.

L1 elements are retrotransposons that have been replicating and evolving in mammalian genomes since before the mammalian radiation. Rattus norvegicus shares the young L1mlvi2 clade only with its sister taxon, Rattus cf moluccarius. Here we compared the L1mlvi2 clade in these recently diverged species and found that it evolved rapidly into closely related but distinct clades: the L1mlvi2-rm clade (or subfamily), characterized here from R. cf moluccarius, and the L1mlvi2-rn clade, originally described in R. norvegicus. In addition to other differences, these clades are distinguished by a cluster of amino acid replacement substitutions in ORF I. Both rat species contain the L1mlvi2-rm clade, but the L1mlvi2-rn clade is restricted to R. norvegicus. Therefore, the L1mlvi2-rm clade arose prior to the divergence of R. norvegicus and R. cf moluccarius, and the L1mlvi2-rn clade amplified after their divergence. The total number of L1mlvi2-rm elements in R. cf moluccarius is about the same as the sum of the L1mlvi2-rm and L1mlvi2-rn elements in R. norvegicus. The possibility that L1 amplification is in some way limited so that the two clades compete for replicative supremacy as well as the implications of the other distinguishing characteristic of the L1mlvi2-rn and L1mlvi2-rm clades are discussed.

Determination of the evolutionary relationships in Rattus sensu lato (Rodentia : Muridae) using L1 (LINE-1) amplification events.

We determined approximately 215 bp of DNA sequence from the 3'-untranslated region (UTR) of 240 cloned L1 (LINE-1) elements isolated from 22 species of Rattus sensu lato and Rattus sensu stricto murine rodents. The sequences were sorted into different L1 subfamilies, and oligonucleotides cognate to them were hybridized to genomic DNA of various taxa. From the distribution of the L1 subfamilies in the various species, we inferred the partial phylogeny of Rattus sensu lato. The four Maxomys species comprise a well-defined clade separate from a monophyletic cluster that contains the two Leopoldamys and four Niviventer species. The Niviventer/Leopoldamys clade, in turn, shares a node with the clade that contains Berylmys, Sundamys, Bandicota, and Rattus sensu stricto. The evolutionary relationships that we deduced agree with and significantly extend the phylogeny of Rattus sensu lato established by other molecular criteria. Furthermore, the L1 amplification events scored here produced a unique phylogenetic tree, that is, in no case did a character (a given L1 amplification event) appear on more than one branch. The lack of homoplasy found in this study supports the robustness of L1 amplification events as phylogenetic markers for the study of mammalian evolution.

Recombination creates novel L1 (LINE-1) elements in Rattus norvegicus.

Mammalian L1 (long interspersed repeated DNA. LINE-1) retrotransposons consist of a 5' untranslated region (UTR) with regulatory properties, two protein encoding regions (ORF I, ORF II, which encodes a reverse transcriptase) and a 3' UTR. L1 elements have been evolving in mammals for > 100 million years and this process continues to generate novel L1 subfamilies in modern species. Here we characterized the youngest known subfamily in Rattus norvegicus, L1mlvi2, and unexpectedly found that this element has a dual ancestry. While its 3' UTR shares the same lineage as its nearest chronologically antecedent subfamilies, L13 and L14, its ORF I sequence does not. The L1mlvi2 ORF I was derived from an ancestral ORF I sequence that was the evolutionary precursor of the L13 and L14 ORF I. We suggest that an ancestral ORF I sequence was recruited into the modern L1mlvi2 subfamily by recombination that possibly could have resulted from template strand switching by the reverse transcriptase during L1 replication. This mechanism could also account for some of the structural features of rodent L1 5' UTR and ORF I sequences including one of the more dramatic features of L1 evolution in mammals, namely the repeated acquisition of novel 5' UTRs.

L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposable elements provide a "fossil" record of the phylogenetic history of murid rodents.

The single most difficult problem in phylogenetic analysis is deciding whether a shared taxonomic character is due to common ancestry or one that appeared independently due to convergence, parallelism, or reversion to an ancestral state. Mammalian L1 retrotransposons undergo periodic amplifications in which multiple copies of the elements are interspersed in the genome. Because these elements apparently are transmitted only by inheritance and are retained in the genome, a shared L1 amplification event can only be an inherited ancestral character. We propose that L1 amplification events can be an excellent tool for analyzing mammalian evolution and demonstrate here how we addressed several refractory problems in rodent systematics using L1 DNA as a taxonomic character.

Amplification of the ancient murine Lx family of long interspersed repeated DNA occurred during the murine radiation.

We identified and characterized the relics of an ancient rodent L1 family, referred to as Lx, which was extensively amplified at the time of the murine radiation about 12 million years ago, and which we showed was ancestral to the modern L1 families in rat and mouse. Here we have extended our analysis of the Lx amplification by examining more murine and nonmurine species for Lx sequences using both blot hybridization and the polymerase chain reaction for a total of 36 species. In addition we have determined the relative copy number and sequence divergence, or age, of Lx elements in representative murine genera. Our results show that while Lx sequences are confined to murine genera, the extent of the amplification was different in the different murine lineages, indicating that the amplification of Lx did not precede, but was coincident with, the murine radiation. The implications of our findings for the evolutionary dynamics of L1 families and the utility of ancestral amplification events for systematics are discussed.

The evolution of long interspersed repeated DNA (L1, LINE 1) as revealed by the analysis of an ancient rodent L1 DNA family.

All modern mammals contain a distinctive, highly repeated (> or = 50,000 members) family of long interspersed repeated DNA called the L1 (LINE 1) family. While the modern L1 families were derived from a common ancestor that predated the mammalian radiation approximately 80 million years ago, most of the members of these families were generated within the last 5 million years. However, recently we demonstrated that modern murine (Old World rats and mice) genomes share an older long interspersed repeated DNA family that we called Lx. Here we report our analysis of the DNA sequence of Lx family members and the relationship of this family to the modern L1 families in mouse and rat. The extent of DNA sequence divergence between Lx members indicates that the Lx amplification occurred about 12 million years ago, around the time of the murine radiation. Parsimony analysis revealed that Lx elements were ancestral to both the modern rat and mouse L1 families. However, we found that few if any of the evolutionary intermediates between the Lx and the modern L1 families were extensively amplified. Because the modern L1 families have evolved under selective pressure, the evolutionary intermediates must have been capable of replication. Therefore, replication-competent L1 elements can reside in genomes without undergoing extensive amplification. We discuss the bearing of our findings on the evolution of L1 DNA elements and the mammalian genome.

Amplification of an ancestral mammalian L1 family of long interspersed repeated DNA occurred just before the murine radiation.

Each mammalian genus examined so far contains 50,000-100,000 members of an L1 (LINE 1) family of long interspersed repeated DNA elements. Current knowledge on the evolution of L1 families presents a paradox because, although L1 families have been in mammalian genomes since before the mammalian radiation approximately 80 million years ago, most members of the L1 families are only a few million years old. Accordingly it has been suggested either that the extensive amplification that characterizes present-day L1 families did not occur in the past or that old members were removed as new ones were generated. However, we show here that an ancestral rodent L1 family was extensively amplified approximately 10 million years ago and that the relics (approximately 60,000 copies) of this amplification have persisted in modern murine genomes (Old World rats and mice). This amplification occurred just before the divergence of modern murine genera from their common ancestor and identifies the murine node in the lineage of modern muroid rodents. Our results suggest that repeated amplification of L1 elements is a feature of the evolution of mammalian genomes and that ancestral amplification events could provide a useful tool for determining mammalian lineages.

Insertion of L1 elements into sites that can form non-B DNA. Interactions of non-B DNA-forming sequences.

Three rat L1 element integration (target) sites chosen at random can adopt non-B DNA structures in vitro at normal bacterial superhelical densities. These target sites contain, respectively, short, mixed (AT)n tracts that we show can form one or more cruciforms, short (GT)n tracts, or polypurine:polypyrimidine regions. These sites share no sequence homology, and a non-B DNA structure appears to be the only feature common to them all. When the right end of the L1Rn3 element which forms a complex series of non-B DNA structures including two triplexes, and its target site which undergoes cruciform extrusion, are present on the same supercoiled molecule, they compete for available supercoil energy. The amount of non-B DNA formed at each site varies with pH, the concentration of cations, and the size of the topological domain. The implication of our findings for recombination of L1 elements and for the effect of these elements on contiguous DNA sequences is discussed.

The structure of the guanine-rich polypurine:polypyrimidine sequence at the right end of the rat L1 (LINE) element.

We report here that the 64-base pair (bp) guanine-rich polypurine:polypyrimidine tract derived from the right end of the rat long interspersed DNA element is reactive in a supercoil-dependent manner with a variety of chemical probes of non-B DNA structure. At pH 5.0 in the presence of Mg2+, part of the sequence (position 10-40) forms the following two types of triplexes: a G.G.C triplex, and an unusual C.G.C triplex. The latter structure is much more prevalent than the former and is unusual in that the resultant free purine strand forms a hairpin loop. In the absence of Mg2+ the G.G.C triplex disappears and the amount of C.G.C triplex is diminished, and at pH 7.5 in the presence or absence of Mg2+, little or no triplex is observed. Deletion of the 24-bp region just 3' of the triplex-forming region greatly reduces the amount of triplex formed. In this region, which includes an 18-bp polypurine:polypyrimidine sequence, both strands exhibit a moderate symmetric reactivity with the chemical probes tested, independent of pH and Mg2+. The implications of this structurally complex region for the properties of the rat L1 element are discussed.

The structure of the regulatory region of the rat L1 (L1Rn, long interspersed repeated) DNA family of transposable elements.

Here we report the DNA structure of the left 1.5 kb of two newly isolated full length members of the rat L1 DNA family (L1Rn, long interspersed repeated DNA). In contrast to earlier isolated rat L1 members, both of these contain promoter-like regions that are most likely full length. In addition, the promoter-like region of both members has undergone a partial tandem duplication. A second internal region of the left end of one of the reported members is also tandemly duplicated. The propensity of the left end of rat L1 elements to undergo this form of genetic rearrangement, as well as other structural features revealed by the present work, is discussed in light of the fact that during evolution the otherwise conserved mammalian L1 DNA families have each acquired completely different promoter-like regions. In an accompanying paper [Nur, I., Pascale, E., and Furano, A. V. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, submitted], we report that one of the rat promoter-like regions can function as a promoter in rat cells when fused to the Escherichia coli chloramphenicol acyltransferase gene.