Evaluation of a novel solubilized formulation of ibuprofen in the treatment of migraine headache: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study.

A total of 729 migraine sufferers with moderate to severe baseline pain evaluated a single 200, 400 or 600 mg dose of a new liquigel formulation of ibuprofen over 8 h. Ibuprofen liquigels were significantly superior to placebo for cumulative headache response (pain reduced to mild or none) from 0.5 (600 mg) or 1 h (200 and 400 mg) to 8 h. At 2 h, respective headache response rates for ibuprofen 200, 400 and 600 mg and placebo were 64%, 72%, 72% and 50%. All three doses were also significantly superior to placebo for 2-h pain-free (25%, 28%, 29% and 13%, respectively) and for proportions with mild or no limitation of activity (2-8 h). Ibuprofen liquigels were generally superior to placebo for reducing photophobia, phonophobia, or nausea (1-4 h) and for global evaluation. All doses were well tolerated. These data demonstrate that ibuprofen liquigels relieve the pain, ancillary symptoms, and limitation of activity, of migraine.

The safety profile of nonprescription ibuprofen in multiple-dose use: a meta-analysis.

A meta-analysis was performed to compare the incidence of adverse experiences (AEs) during the multiple-dose use of nonprescription ibuprofen to a placebo. Eight studies, with doses ranging from 800 to 1200 mg/day and durations of 1 to 10 days, met the criteria for inclusion. AEs were classified according to COSTART, except that "abdominal pain" was conservatively reassigned to the digestive system. In each study, the overall AE frequency among ibuprofen-treated subjects (n = 1094) was numerically less than or equal to the placebo (n = 1093). Pooled across all studies, placebo subjects reported AEs significantly (p = 0.018) more often (31.7%) than ibuprofen subjects (27.4%). The frequency of digestive system AEs was comparable (p = 0.420) for the placebo (11.0%) and ibuprofen (12.1%); there was no significant difference for any specific digestive system AE. AE frequency in the "body-as-a-whole" category was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the placebo (20.4%) than in ibuprofen (14.8%). The number of severe AEs in all of these categories was lower for ibuprofen than for the placebo. These data indicate that nonprescription ibuprofen has an excellent side effect profile in multiple-dose use, with a frequency of gastrointestinal AEs comparable to a placebo.

Brompheniramine maleate: a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with terfenadine for symptoms of allergic rhinitis.

This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel study comparing the effectiveness, at recommended doses, of an extended-release formulation of brompheniramine maleate and terfenadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Subjects with symptoms of seasonal and/or perennial allergic rhinitis received brompheniramine 12 mg (n = 106), 8 mg (n = 105), terfenadine 60 mg (n = 106), or placebo (n = 53) twice daily for 14 days. On treatment days 3, 7, and 14, symptom severity ratings (i.e., rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, itchy nose, eyes or throat, excessive tearing, postnasal drip) were completed by the physician; subjects and physicians each completed a global efficacy evaluation. Brompheniramine 12 mg and 8 mg and terfenadine were more effective than placebo (p < or = 0.05) on the physicians' global: brompheniramine 12 mg was more effective than terfenadine (p < or = 0.05) on days 7 and 14 and brompheniramine 8 mg on day 3. On the subjects' global evaluation, brompheniramine 12 mg and 8 mg and terfenadine were more effective than placebo (p < or = 0.05); brompheniramine 12 mg was more effective than terfenadine (p < or = 0.05) on days 7 and 14 and brompheniramine 8 mg on day 3. In general, brompheniramine 8 mg was comparable to terfenadine. On days 3 and 7, the total symptom and total nasal symptom severity scores for subjects receiving brompheniramine 12 mg were significantly more improved than for placebo (p < 0.05); terfenadine was not different from placebo; brompheniramine 12 mg was significantly better than terfenadine on day 7 (p < 0.05) for reducing total symptom severity and on days 3, 7, and 14 for reducing total nasal symptom severity. Adverse experiences were reported by 155 (41.9%) of the 370 subjects enrolled in the study. The overall rate of adverse experiences in the brompheniramine 12 mg treatment group (57.5%) was significantly greater (p < 0.05) than for brompheniramine 8 mg (38.1%), terfenadine (31.1%), and placebo (39.6%). In conclusion, an extended-release formulation of brompheniramine 12 mg or 8 mg bid alleviates allergic rhinitis symptoms and brompheniramine 12 mg provides significantly better relief of these symptoms than terfenadine 60 mg bid.

Brompheniramine, loratadine, and placebo in allergic rhinitis: a placebo-controlled comparative clinical trial.

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of an extended-release formulation of a classical antihistamine, brompheniramine, and a second-generation compound, loratadine, in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Subjects with symptoms of allergic rhinitis received brompheniramine 12 mg twice daily (n = 112), loratadine 10 mg once daily (n = 112), or placebo twice daily (n = 114) for 7 days. Study medications were blinded using a double-dummy technique. Subjects completed an overall evaluation of symptom relief on a daily basis and returned on treatment days 3 and 7, at which times the investigator assessed symptom severity. The investigator and subject each completed a global efficacy evaluation, and subjects were interviewed regarding adverse experiences. The primary efficacy variable was the physicians' global efficacy evaluation on day 3. Symptoms also were analyzed as summed severity scores for all symptoms and for the nasal symptom cluster of rhinorrhea, sneezing, and nasal blockage. At all post-baseline evaluations (days 3, 7, and averaged over the two days), brompheniramine was significantly better than loratadine and placebo for both sets of summed symptom scores and all three global assessments. Loratadine was significantly better than placebo for physician ratings of total symptom severity averaged over the two days and for the physician and subject ratings of the nasal cluster on day 3. Central nervous system-related symptoms were the most frequently reported adverse experiences; somnolence was reported most frequently by patients taking brompheniramine, and its occurrence was less frequent as treatment continued. A nonprescription, extended-release formulation of brompheniramine 12 mg twice daily provided significantly better relief of symptomatic allergic rhinitis than loratadine 10 mg once daily.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effectiveness and safety of nizatidine in the prevention of postprandial heartburn.

BACKGROUND: Heartburn is frequently associated with overindulgence in food and drink, meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion, and a gastroesophageal reflux with a pH of 4 or lower. Nizatidine is a selective histamine2 receptor antagonist that effectively suppresses gastric acid secretion at lower than prescription doses and has been approved for nonprescription use in the prevention of postprandial heartburn. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relative effectiveness of 3 dose levels of nizatidine (225 mg, 75 mg, and 25 mg) in preventing postprandial heartburn. METHODS: Four hundred thirteen subjects with documented moderate to severe heartburn following a standard meal that provoked heartburn were randomized to receive a single dose of nizatidine at 225 mg (n = 104), 75 mg (n = 101), or 25 mg (n = 105), or placebo (n = 103) 30 minutes before the meal, at 30 minutes (immediately after completing the meal), and at 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, and 210 minutes (from beginning the meal), subjects assessed the presence or absence of heartburn (yes or no) and the severity of heartburn (100-mm visual analog scale). RESULTS: The use of both 225 mg and 75 mg of nizatidine were significantly better than placebo in preventing heartburn in the proportion of subjects with complete prevention of heartburn (15 [14.4%] and 15 [14.9%], respectively, vs 3 [2.9%]; P < .001); the effects of nizatidine, 25 mg, in 7 subjects (7%) were not distinguishable from placebo. Similar results for nizatidine, 225 mg and 75 mg, were seen for longest duration of no heartburn, total duration of no heartburn, the average severity of heartburn, and the peak heartburn severity. All 3 doses of nizatidine were superior to placebo (P < .001) in reducing average and peak heartburn severity and were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Single doses of 225 mg and 75 mg of nizatidine administered 30 minutes before a standard meal intended to provoke heartburn are significantly more effective than placebo for the prevention and/or reduction of postprandial heartburn.

Nonprescription ibuprofen and acetaminophen in the treatment of tension-type headache.

A single-dose, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted to examine the relative analgesic effectiveness of 400 mg of ibuprofen (n = 153), 1,000 mg of acetaminophen (n = 151), and placebo (n = 151) in volunteers with muscle contraction headache. At regular intervals during a 4-hour period, participants evaluated headache pain intensity on a 100-mm visual analog scale and headache pain relief on a six-category scale. Both active agents were significantly different from placebo at all time points and in reducing pain intensity and providing relief of headache overall. Similarly, ibuprofen at 400 mg differed significantly from acetaminophen at 1,000 mg on both rating scales. Participants receiving ibuprofen at 400 mg achieved complete relief of headache faster than those receiving acetaminophen at 1,000 mg or placebo, and more participants taking ibuprofen experienced complete relief of headache than those taking placebo or acetaminophen. Both ibuprofen at 400 mg and acetaminophen at 1,000 mg are efficacious analgesic agents for muscle contraction headache, and ibuprofen at 400 mg is significantly more effective than acetaminophen at 1,000 mg for treating this condition.

Brompheniramine, terfenadine, and placebo in allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Second-generation antihistamines, reported to lack central nervous system depressant activity, may be considered to have a clinical advantage over traditional antihistamines. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness, at recommended doses, of an extended-release formulation of nonprescription brompheniramine and prescription terfenadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel study. Subjects with symptoms of allergic rhinitis received brompheniramine 12 mg (n = 96), terfenadine 60 mg (n = 96), or placebo (n = 95) twice daily for 14 days. Subjects returned on treatment days 3, 7, and 14; at which times, the investigator assessed symptom severity (i.e., rhinorrhea; sneezing; nasal blockage; pruritus of the eyes, nose, or pharynx; watery eyes; and postnasal drip). The investigator and the subject each completed a global efficacy evaluation, and subjects were interviewed regarding the occurrence of adverse experiences. Symptoms were analyzed as summed severity scores for (1) all symptoms and (2) for the symptom cluster of rhinorrhea, sneezing, and nasal blockage. RESULTS: At all post-baseline evaluations (days 3, 7, and 14), brompheniramine was significantly better (P < or = .05) than terfenadine and placebo for both sets of summed symptom scores and for both global assessments. Terfenadine was significantly better (P < or = .05) than placebo on the physician's global at day 14. Central nervous system-related complaints were the most frequently reported adverse experiences among all three groups; somnolence was reported most frequently by brompheniramine-treated subjects. CONCLUSION: A nonprescription, extended-release formulation of brompheniramine, 12 mg bid, provided significantly better relief of symptomatic allergic rhinitis than terfenadine, 60 mg bid.

Renovascular effects of nonprescription ibuprofen in elderly hypertensive patients with mild renal impairment.

To determine the renovascular effects of nonprescription ibuprofen in the maximum labeled over-the-counter (OTC) dosage for 7 days, and to compare these effects with those of two other available OTC analgesics, aspirin and acetaminophen, we evaluated 25 elderly patients with mild thiazide-treated hypertension and mild renal insufficiency. Under double-blind conditions, patients were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups: ibuprofen 400 mg 3 times/day, aspirin 650 mg 3 times/day, or acetaminophen 650 mg 3 times/day. Blood pressure and indexes of renal function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine clearance, serum electrolytes) were measured over 7 days in a clinical research center. None of the treatments had a clinically significant effect on blood pressure. Renal function indexes also remained unchanged during all three treatments. We conclude that elderly patients with mild thiazide-treated hypertension and mild renal insufficiency seem not to be at risk of developing additional renal compromise or of having their hypertension control diminished by treatment with these OTC analgesics for 7 days.

Nonprescription ibuprofen: side effect profile.

Single doses of nonprescription analgesics are commonly used to treat self-diagnosed conditions. To evaluate the safety of single doses of nonprescription-strength ibuprofen, we examined reported side effects from 15 double-blind, randomized, controlled trials we conducted of the drug to treat various common painful conditions (e.g., headache, sore throat). All studies included placebo and another nonprescription analgesic, acetaminophen. A total of 878 subjects received ibuprofen 200 or 400 mg, 849 acetaminophen 650 or 1000 mg, and 852 placebo. The overall frequency of side effects was comparable: ibuprofen 2.4%, acetaminophen 3.2%, and placebo 2.1%. The frequency of central nervous system symptoms was 0.8%, 2.1%, and 0.9%, respectively. Upper gastro-intestinal upset ranged from 0.8-0.9% of subjects in all groups. We conclude that single doses of nonprescription ibuprofen are well tolerated and demonstrate a side effect profile indistinguishable from that of acetaminophen and placebo.

Use of a community task force by hospitals to improve systems of care.

A community task force is effective in the strategic planning process for improvement of health care services in a continuum of care. This article describes the role of a community task force in developing services for senior citizens within the mission of a hospital. A case study is presented demonstrating how a hospital benefited from a task force with a focus on senior care.

Interactions among heart rate, autonomic activity, and arterial pressure upon the multiple repetitive extrasystole threshold in the dog.

The effects of heart rate, autonomic stimulation, and arterial blood pressure upon the multiple repetitive extrasystole threshold (MRET) were studied after coronary occlusion in anesthetized dogs. The MRET was unaffected by changes in heart rate. Sympathetic stimulation alone reduced the MRET from 52.4 +/- 3.7 (mean +/- SEM) to 41.3 +/- 2.7 mA. Vagal stimulation alone was without effect. During simultaneous sympathetic and vagal stimulation the threshold was 48.7 +/- 3.0 mA. This supports the contention that vagal activity serves mainly to oppose the tendency for sympathetic activity to lower the MRET. Reduction of blood pressure significantly decreased the average MRET from 38.6 +/- 2.5 to 34.4 +/- 1.8 mA. The presence of a post junctional site for the observed sympathetic-vagal interaction was investigated using isoproterenol infusion and vagal stimulation. Infusion of isoproterenol lowered the MRET. Vagal stimulation in this situation raised the MRET; the effect varied directly with the rate of isoproterenol infusion. This suggests that part of the vagal effect is exerted postjunctionally; that is, directly upon the myocardial cell and not merely by inhibition of adrenergic transmitter release at sympathetic nerve endings.