Disability and health-related Quality of Life in Long-term Survivors of Cancer in Childhood in Brazil

There is limited experience with patient-reported measurements of health status and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in survivors of cancer in childhood in low-income countries. The purposes of this study were to collect such measurements in Brazil, to test hypotheses about differences among diagnostic groups, and to compare results with those from other countries. Survivors were eligible if diagnosed with cancer in childhood, attending a long-term follow-up clinic, cancer free, literate, and at least 13 years of age. Health status measurements were collected using a Brazilian Portuguese Health Utilities Index questionnaire. Questionnaire responses were converted to scores for morbidity in individual health attributes and for overall HRQL. More than one-third of the 138 consecutive survivors who participated reported some cognitive disability or pain. Approximately one-quarter reported problems with vision, speech, or emotion. Mean HRQL was similar (P>0.05) among countries for survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and Hodgkin disease. The results support the hypotheses that Brazilian survivors of cancer in childhood experience a wide range of disabilities and impaired HRQL, are similar to those in other countries, and should be assessed in long-term follow-up clinics.

Translation and cultural adaptation of Health Utilities Index (HUI) Mark 2 (HUI2) and Mark 3 (HUI3) with application to survivors of childhood cancer in Brazil

There are few publications reporting health-related quality of life (HRQL) in developing nations. Most instruments measuring HRQL have been developed in English-speaking countries. These instruments need to be culturally adapted for use in non-English-speaking countries. The HUI2 and HUI3 are generic, preference-based systems for describing health status and HRQL. Developed in Canada, the systems have been translated into more than a dozen languages and used worldwide in hundreds of studies of clinical and general populations. The Brazilian-Portuguese translation of the HUI systems was supervised by senior HUInc staff having experience with both the HUI systems and translations. The process included two independent forward translations of the multi-attribute health status classification systems and related questionnaires, consensus between translators on a forward translation, back-translation by two independent translators of the forward translation, and review of the back-translations by original developers of the HUI. The final questionnaires were tested by surveying a sample of convenience of 50 patients recruited at the Centro de Tratamento e Pesquisa-Hospital do Cancer in São Paulo, Brazil. Fifty patients were enrolled in the study. No assessor, patient or nurse or physician, reported problems answering the HUI questionnaires. No significant differences were found in mean overall HUI2 or HUI3 utility scores among types of assessors. Variability in scores are similar to those from other studies in Latin America and Canada. Test results provide preliminary evidence that the Brazilian-Portuguese translation is acceptable, understandable, reliable and valid for assessing health-status and HRQL among survivors of cancer in childhood in Brazil

The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies.

This paper reviews the Health Utilities Index (HUI) systems as means to describe health status and obtain utility scores reflecting health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HUI Mark 2 (HUI2) and Mark 3 (HUI3) classification and scoring systems are described. The methods used to estimate multiattribute utility functions for HUI2 and HUI3 are reviewed. The use of HUI in clinical studies for a wide variety of conditions in a large number of countries is illustrated. HUI provides a comprehensive description of the health status of subjects in clinical studies. HUI has been shown to be a reliable, responsive and valid measure in a wide variety of clinical studies. Utility scores provide an overall assessment of the HRQoL of patients. Utility scores are also useful in cost-utility analyses and related studies. General population norm data are available. The widespread use of HUI facilitates the interpretation of results and permits comparisons. HUI is a useful tool for assessing health status and HRQoL in clinical studies.

Preliminary translation and cultural adaptation of Health Utilities Index questionnaires for application in Argentina.

Quality-of-life assessment is being used increasingly in clinical research. This is true particularly in the case of survivors of cancer in childhood, where improving survival rates have raised concern regarding the long-term effects of medical cure. Health-status assessment and quality-of-life instruments have been developed for the most part in the English language, thus necessitating their translation and cultural adaptation for use in non-English-speaking countries. Our purpose was to develop a set of Spanish-language questionnaires for application with a population of children with cancer in a tertiary-care center in Buenos Aires, Argentina. The Health Utilities Index (HUI), a conceptual framework for assessing health status, was chosen for this study. Three distinct questionnaires, based on the HUI, were used: a self-completed one for health professionals and teachers (15Q) to report assessments of children and 2 interviewer-administered ones, for child survivors (42Q) to report assessments about their own health status and parents (45Q) to report assessments about their children's health status. The original translations and reviews were accomplished with direct oversight by members of the HUI Group, to ensure conceptual equivalence. The instruments were then tested in Buenos Aires by application to staff of the hematology-oncology service, childhood cancer patients and the parents of childhood cancer patients. Several modifications were made based on these tests. We concluded that the translation and cultural adaptation of these instruments was adequate for use with the groups tested in a pilot survey of survivors of childhood cancer in Argentina.

Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2.

The Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HUI:2) is a generic multiattribute, preference-based system for assessing health-related quality of life. Health Utilities Index Mark 2 consists of two components: a seven-attribute health status classification system and a scoring formula. The seven attributes are sensation, mobility, emotion, cognition, self-care, pain, and fertility. A random sample of general population parents were interviewed to determine cardinal preferences for the health states in the system. The health states were defined as lasting for a 60-year lifetime, starting at age 10. Values were measured using visual analogue scaling. Utilities were measured using a standard gamble technique. A scoring formula is provided, based on a multiplicative multiattribute utility function from the responses of 194 subjects. The utility scores are death-anchored (death = 0.0) and form an interval scale. Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and its utility scores can be useful to other researchers in a wide variety of settings who wish to document health status and assign preference scores.

Evaluation of the burden of illness for pediatric asthmatic patients and their parents.

To examine the quality-of-life burden of asthma in a pediatric population, we systematically surveyed 100 patients with moderate asthma and one parent of each patient to determine the impact of the disease on day-to-day life. We found that perceptions of burden of illness varied by viewpoint. For patients, the symptoms of asthma form the largest component of the burden of the disease; in addition, more than half of the sample listed various emotional function items that were of at least moderate bother to them. Parents cited worry and concern about the disease and the medications used to treat it and their inability to relieve their child's symptoms as the major components of the burden of the disease. We conclude that although pediatric patients with moderate asthma find the respiratory symptoms of the disease troublesome, few children perceive that their asthma poses a major disruption of their lives. For the parents of these patients, strategies could be implemented by clinicians to ease the common worries and concerns surrounding the child's asthma.