Latching Medical Students onto a Virtual Breastfeeding Elective during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Objectives: To describe the implementation of a successful two-week virtual breastfeeding elective for medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic and characterize student demographics, objective knowledge, and perspectives on breastfeeding before and after the elective. Study Design: We adapted the Santa Rosa Kaiser Permanente Family Medicine breastfeeding residency curriculum to create a two-week virtual medical student elective using Kern's six steps of curriculum development and a competency-based education framework. Educational components included self-paced modules, shadowing experiences, and group didactics. Objective knowledge was assessed with multiple-choice tests before and after the elective compared using a paired t-test. Reflective writing pieces were qualitatively analyzed using the six phases of thematic analysis developed by Braun and Clarke. Results: From 2020 to 2023, 40 medical students completed the elective. Breastfeeding knowledge increased significantly from the pre-test 72% (95% CI: 52-92%) to post-test 91% (95% CI: 81-100%) (p < 0.001). Over 90% of students felt that learning objectives were met well or very well and agreed or strongly agreed that the elective increased their knowledge and confidence in providing anticipatory guidance to breastfeeding parents. Similar themes were shared across students' reflective writing pieces, with nearly 30% (n = 23) of the student essays addressing socio-cultural and racial differences in beliefs surrounding breastfeeding. Conclusion: A virtual breastfeeding curriculum for medical students is well-received by stakeholders (patients, lactation consultants, students, etc.) and improves breastfeeding knowledge and confidence. A virtual elective is an innovative and effective way to deliver breastfeeding education and can be used even when institutional breastfeeding or lactation support is unavailable.

A Pilot Breastfeeding-Supportive Texting Program for African American and Black Mothers.

Background: Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended through age 6 months, and 24.9% of all U.S. mothers, but only 19.8% of African American or Black (AA/B) mothers, achieved this goal (2020). Smartphone technology, specifically short message service (SMS or texting), may provide a strategy to reach and engage AA/B women who otherwise face barriers related to racism in accessing breastfeeding resources. Unfortunately, few mobile health applications are designed for AA/B women. Methods: We created a culturally sensitive breastfeeding promotion and support text message library that begins at 28 weeks prenatally and continues through 10 weeks postpartum. We tested feasibility and acceptability with a proof-of-concept (POC) trial that enrolled 20 AA/B women, and we tested content and perceived usefulness with a pilot study that enrolled 28 AA/B women. Results: In the POC trial, 95% of participants received all messages, demonstrating feasibility, and none requested fewer or to stop messages, demonstrating acceptability. In the pilot, >85% of participants responded positively regarding the number and helpfulness of the texts received, and whether the information was needed. Using a validated measure for online content for parents, >70% of POC and pilot study participants found that the information was very relevant or relevant, completely understandable, taught them something new, and "will help me improve the health or well-being of my child." Conclusion: A new breastfeeding-supportive text messaging program intended for AA/B mothers appears feasible, acceptable, informative, and relevant. This is the first breastfeeding text messaging application of which we are aware that is tailored for the AA/B population.

Understanding Breastfeeding Barriers at an Urban Pediatric Practice.

Breastfeeding is the optimal nutrition for infants given the numerous health benefits that are conferred on mothers, infants, and society in a dose-dependent manner. However, low breastfeeding rates and racial breastfeeding inequities persist for the African American (AA) community due to historic structural racism. The issue is especially salient at the Rainbow Center for Women and Children, an urban health center in Cleveland, Ohio where approximately 90% of their mothers are AA, WIC-eligible, and publicly insured. Our study aims to elucidate factors contributing to breastfeeding practices and identify supports that could be added for women served at RCWC. The study was conducted within 2 cohorts both of exclusively AA  women. Wave 1 of the study included AA mothers who exclusively breastfed, did mixed feeding, or exclusively formula fed. Wave 2 included expectant women at least considering breastfeeding. Breastfeeding attitudes of those who had exclusively breastfed or practiced mixed feeding were not significantly different than those of expectant participants planning to breastfeed; mean attitude scores, however, were in the "neutral" range. Participants endorsed many sources of support for their feeding choices, including the infant's father, their own parents, and family. However, the data show that even when women feel personally supported in their feeding choices by their partner and family, if additional breastfeeding help is needed, they will benefit from help accessing available resources. Thus, lactation support that helps women achieve their own breastfeeding goals is optimal; customized care ultimately can move the needle on racial inequities in breastfeeding for our society.

"All in Breastfeeding": An Approach to Improving Breastfeeding Support at the Rainbow Center for Women and Children.

It has been well documented in the literature that breastfeeding has many benefits for mothers and their infants. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life and continued breastfeeding until the age of 1 or longer as desired by the mother and infant; however, many mothers face barriers to achieving this goal. More specifically, we noticed that at our Rainbow Center for Women and Children (the Center), few mothers were able to achieve exclusive or sustained breastfeeding. This study aimed to determine stakeholder views at the Center regarding barriers to breastfeeding in an underserved patient population and to develop a Breastfeeding Intervention Bundle from these responses to improve breastfeeding rates. We then surveyed participants including mothers, providers, and staff about support and comfort with knowledge gained over the period of the Intervention. While our study was unable to document a clear or sustained improvement in participant support or comfort related to breastfeeding over a 6-month period, we furthered our knowledge about barriers to breastfeeding and concluded that interventions to improve breastfeeding rates will likely need to be initiated at the systems level, not only at the individual patient and provider level, and with joint support from all stakeholders.

Human milk feeding and wheeze in Black infants born preterm.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between human milk exposure at 3 months corrected gestational age and recurrent wheeze in preterm Black infants. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from the D-Wheeze trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01601847). Associations between human milk feeding at 3 months corrected age and wheezing outcomes were examined by generalized linear models. RESULTS: Exclusively human milk fed infants (n = 13) had significantly fewer wheezing episodes than formula fed infants (n = 230) (IRR (95% CI) = 0.25 (0.07, 0.89), p = 0.03). There were no hospitalizations in infants receiving exclusive human milk. Receiving any human milk was associated with decreased odds of hospitalization by 12 months corrected age (OR (95% CI) = 0.12 (0.02, 0.79), p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Exclusive human milk feeding at three months corrected gestational age is associated with decreased number of wheezing episodes in the first year of life in preterm Black infants.

A behavioral economic demand analysis of mothers' decision to exclusively breastfeed in the workplace.

The present study determined whether behavioral economic demand analysis could characterize mothers' decision to exclusively breastfeed in the workplace. Females, aged between 18 and 50 who have given birth in the past three years, completed a novel demand task with hypothetical scenarios, in which they returned to work with a 2-month-old baby. Participants rated their likelihood of breastfeeding their baby at a workplace lactation room versus formula-feeding their baby at their desk. The distance to the lactation room ranged from 10 s to 60 min. This assessment was conducted with and without hypothetical financial incentives for 6-month exclusive breastfeeding. Primary dependent measures were demand intensity and change in demand elasticity, which could conceptually represent initiation and continuation of breastfeeding, respectively. Demand for breastfeeding was more intense and less elastic (i.e., more likely to initiate and continue breastfeeding) among mothers with an experience of 6-month exclusive breastfeeding and under the condition with the financial incentives. The novel demand task can potentially provide a useful behavioral marker for quantifying mothers' decision to initiate and continue exclusive breastfeeding in the workplace, informing workplace policy regarding lactation rooms, identifying risk for early cessation, and developing and individualizing an intervention to assist mothers to exclusively breastfeed in the workplace.

Mobile Phone Applications to Support Breastfeeding Among African-American Women: a Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities persist with respect to breastfeeding. The use of health e-technology is increasing, with promise for a role in improving breastfeeding outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We undertook a scoping review of both individual breastfeeding apps and the literature on breastfeeding apps to map the available evidence on app-based breastfeeding support for African-American mothers. DESIGN: A systematic search of online databases identified 241 English language papers published on or before June 2020 that included e-technology in support of breastfeeding. We included those that (1) described individual human subjects research studies utilizing any research design, (2) described app-based breastfeeding support, and (3) could be pertinent for African-American mothers, and assessed for inclusion and relevance for this population. We also searched app stores for breastfeeding apps, and evaluated features with a rubric. Our aim was to identify if gaps exist relative to breastfeeding support for African-Americans. RESULTS: Of the 15 publications meeting inclusion criteria, 9 focused on app development, 4 examined user experience, and 3 examined breastfeeding outcomes with use of an app (one study overlapped categories). The percentage of African-American participants ranged from 100% (2 studies) to none (7 studies); 3 studies (20%) focused on African-American mothers' breastfeeding experience. Of 77 apps that met inclusion criteria, just one was both breastfeeding-focused by content and targeted for African-Americans by picture predominance. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of studies was generally high and many included African-American participants, but research focused on breastfeeding apps specifically for African-American mothers/parents is limited, creating a meaningful gap in the literature.

Barriers to post-placental intrauterine device receipt among expectant minority women.

PURPOSE: We aimed to identify barriers to breastfeeding-compatible post-placental intrauterine devices (IUDs) for expectant predominantly non-Hispanic African-American women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional survey study, conducted at 3 Cleveland community partner locations, enrolled 119 expectant predominantly unmarried but partnered non-Hispanic African-American women. The survey assessed contraceptive, IUD-specific and breastfeeding attitudes and intentions. Survey responses were described with percentages and frequencies, and compared by feeding intention using 2-sided Chi-Square tests. Factor analysis with Varimax rotation identified 2 potential measures of reluctance to post-placental IUD acceptance. The relationship of factors scores to maternal characteristics was assessed. RESULTS: Feeding intention (breastfeeding versus not) was not related to perceived barriers to post-placental IUD receipt among expectant minority women. A "Personal Risks Reluctance" factor included low risk IUD events (migration and expulsion), misconceptions (delayed fertility return), menstrual changes and partner preference: a higher score was significantly associated with younger age group but no other maternal characteristics. A "Not Me Reasons" factor included provider and insurance barriers, and was not related to any maternal characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Expectant minority women's perceived barriers to post-placental IUDs are not related to prenatal feeding intentions. We identified two clinically relevant factors that appear to measure barriers to post-placental IUD acceptance.

Individual breastfeeding support with contingent incentives for low-income mothers in the USA: the 'BOOST (Breastfeeding Onset & Onward with Support Tools)' randomised controlled trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: National breastfeeding rates have improved in recent years, however, disparities exist by socioeconomic and psychosocial factors. Suboptimal breastfeeding overburdens the society by increasing healthcare costs. Existing breastfeeding supports including education and peer support have not been sufficient in sustaining breastfeeding rates especially among low-income women. The preliminary outcomes of contingent incentives for breastfeeding in addition to existing support show promising effects in sustaining breastfeeding among mothers in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Programme for women, infants and children (WIC). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This trial uses a parallel randomised controlled trial. This trial is conducted at two sites in separate states in the USA. Mothers who were enrolled in WIC and initiated breastfeeding are eligible. Participants (n=168) are randomised into one of the two study groups: (1) standard care control (SC) group consisting of WIC breastfeeding services plus home-based individual support or (2) SC plus breastfeeding incentives (SC +BFI) contingent on demonstrating successful breastfeeding. All participants receive standard breastfeeding services from WIC, home-based individual support and assessments. Participants in SC receive financial compensation based on the number of completed monthly home visits, paid in a lump sum at the end of the 6-month intervention period. Participants in SC +BFI receive an escalating magnitude of financial incentives contingent on observed breastfeeding, paid monthly during the intervention period, as well as bonus incentives for selecting full breastfeeding food packages at WIC. The primary hypothesis is that monthly incentives contingent on breastfeeding in SC +BFI will significantly increase rates of any breastfeeding compared with SC. The primary outcome is the rate of any breastfeeding over 12 months. Randomisation is completed in an automated electronic system. Staff conducting home visits for support and assessments are blinded to study groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Advarra Institutional Review Board has approved the study protocol (Pro00033168). Findings will be disseminated to our participants, scientific communities, public health officials and any other interested community members. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03964454.

Identifying barriers to post-placental intrauterine device placement: male partners' views.

Objective: The use of post-placental intrauterine devices (IUDs) has potential to address the health issues of suboptimal breastfeeding rates and short inter-pregnancy intervals. An understudied factor that may influence choice of breastfeeding-compatible contraception among postpartum women is their romantic partner. We aimed to identify male partner influences on women's postpartum breastfeeding-compatible contraception choices.Methods: Questionnaires were administered to 75 men in Cleveland, OH, USA. Data on partner priorities, opinions and knowledge about breastfeeding and contraception, and barriers to partner IUD receipt were collected. Survey data were summarised using frequencies and percentages, and univariate logistic regression models were used to explore associations between responses.Results: Participants were predominantly African American, unmarried and had at least one child. Twenty-six participants (36%) reported using contraception with their current partner; men who had discussions and agreed about contraception with their partner were more likely to use it. Thirty-nine men (54%) intended for a future child to breastfeed; this intention was more likely for men who had a child that was breastfed previously and for those with knowledge of breastfeeding benefits. Only 25 (35%) thought a post-placental IUD was safe for breastfeeding mothers; correct IUD knowledge and a partner's positive IUD experience were significantly associated with this response.Conclusion: Our findings suggest that knowledge about breastfeeding and contraception as well as experiential learning regarding breastfeeding and contraception within a partnered relationship are important and that minimal prior experience and low knowledge in these areas may be a male partner barrier to post-placental IUD placement for breastfeeding mothers.

Do Expectant Mothers' Breastfeeding Plans Influence Provider Prenatal Contraceptive Counseling?

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding and optimal birth spacing are associated with improved maternal and infant health outcomes worldwide. Provision of contraceptive advice that is aligned with recommendations for breastfeeding has potential to maximize maternal and infant health. Although there is broad agreement regarding the breastfeeding compatibility of specific postpartum contraceptive methods, it is not known whether maternal breastfeeding intention influences prenatal provider contraceptive counseling. RESEARCH AIM: We aimed to determine if maternal feeding intention is considered by prenatal providers during contraceptive counseling. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional online author-created survey including all prenatal providers (N = 40) at two academic safety-net institutions in Cleveland, Ohio. Of 100 obstetrics/gynecology faculty members, 40 (40%) completed the survey, which included multiple-choice questions. Nominal and ordinal survey results were reported with percentages and frequencies, and categorical variables were compared using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Participants appropriately promoted breastfeeding-compatible postplacental intrauterine device placement, even though maternal feeding intention was specifically considered by just 12 (30%). Endorsed barriers to contraception for breastfeeding mothers included provider medical worries, patient concerns, and colleague resistance. Postplacental levonorgestrel intrauterine devices were recommended for all mothers by 92.5% of participants (n = 37). Recommendations regarding progestin-only and combined oral contraceptive pills were influenced by maternal breastfeeding versus formula-feeding intention. CONCLUSION: Asking expectant women about their feeding intentions within each contraceptive discussion may create opportunities for shared decision making that can optimize perinatal outcomes for both mother and infant worldwide.

Assessing the Feasibility and Effectiveness of Two Prenatal Breastfeeding Intervention Apps in Promoting Postpartum In-Hospital Exclusive Breastfeeding.

Purpose: To test the feasibility and possible effects of two iPad®-based breastfeeding interventions for expectant minority women and evaluate (1) the intervention effect on exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) intention, (2) intervention acceptability and satisfaction, and (3) follow-up rates of in-hospital EBF. Materials and Methods: This was a longitudinal survey study with follow-up chart review. Expectant women who completed clinically required breastfeeding education were eligible and were assigned to one of the following interventions by nonrandomized block design: the champion intervention utilized a free commercially available app to identify a supportive breastfeeding champion and the positive messaging intervention offered breastfeeding information in a question-answer format. Medical records were reviewed postpartum for in-hospital feeding choice. Data were analyzed using percentages, frequencies, chi-squared analyses, and McNemar's test. Results: We enrolled 243 publicly insured predominantly African American women: 132 and 111 completed the champion and positive messaging interventions, respectively. Thirty-two of 40 champion participants (80.03%) intended EBF and did in-hospital EBF; 39/86 champion participants (45.3%) not intending EBF did in-hospital EBF (p < 0.0001 for change). Similarly, 30/36 positive messaging participants (83.3%) intended EBF and did in-hospital EBF; 36/67 positive messaging participants (53.7%) not intending EBF did in-hospital EBF (p < 0.0001 for change). Conclusions: In this pilot of two brief, iPad-based prenatal interventions designed to promote in-hospital EBF among minority women, interventions were feasible and a statistically significant change in the proportion of women who intended (prenatally) and then chose (postpartum) EBF was noted. Additional controlled trials are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach.

Associations Between Prenatal Intention and Postpartum Choice: Infant Feeding and Contraception Decisions Among Inner-City Women.

Purpose: We sought to understand how women's prenatal infant feeding and contraception intentions were related to postpartum choices. Materials and Methods: Expectant women ≥14 years of age receiving care at MacDonald Women's Hospital, Cleveland Ohio were previously surveyed regarding feeding and contraceptive intentions. Here, we asked: (1) What were postpartum feeding choices, and did prenatal intention predict postpartum choice?, (2) What were postpartum contraceptive choices, and did prenatal intention predict postpartum choice?, and (3) What was the relationship of postpartum contraceptive choice to postpartum feeding choice? Results: Of 223 women interviewed prenatally, 214 (96%) were followed to postpartum in-hospital, and 119 out of 214 (56%) were followed to the postpartum visit. The mean age was 25 years, 185 out of 206 (89.8%) were African American, and 149 out of 200 (75.0%) were multiparous. Prenatal feeding and contraceptive intent were significantly associated with postpartum feeding and contraceptive choices, respectively (both p < 0.0001). More women who initiated breastfeeding chose no contraception (54.5% for any breastfeeding versus 32.2% for exclusive formula feeding) versus long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), tubal ligation, or other contraceptive types (χ2 = 9.28, p = 0.03). After adjusting for known confounders, only receipt of other contraceptive types (not LARC, not tubal ligation) was significantly associated with decreased odds of any breastfeeding (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Among low-income predominantly African American inner-city women, prenatal intentions were significantly associated with postnatal choices for infant feeding and contraception. After controlling for confounders, women receiving less effective types of contraception (not LARC and not tubal ligation) had reduced odds of any breastfeeding (p = 0.02).

Expectant inner-city women: attitudes about contraception given infant feeding choice.

PURPOSE: We sought to examine whether low-income inner-city expectant women who intend to breastfeed make different contraceptive choices than those who intend to formula feed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional pilot study surveyed expectant women age 14 years and older receiving prenatal care at MacDonald Women's Hospital, Cleveland Ohio (01 November 2016-15 January 2017). Questions assessed knowledge and attitudes regarding infant feeding and contraception options, and postpartum feeding and contraceptive intentions. RESULTS: We enrolled 223 expectant women, mean age 25.6 years at a median of 30 weeks gestation; 192 (86.5%) were African-American and 171 (75%) were multiparous. Women intending to breastfeed had 0.44 times the odds of intending to use birth control after delivery (95% CI [0.19-1.05], p = .06), while women intending to feed formula had 2.26 times the odds of intending to use birth control after delivery (95% CI [0.95-5.40]). Contraceptive attitudes significantly impacted intent to use contraception (p = .007), with every point higher on the contraception attitudes scale equating to a 7% increase in odds of postpartum contraception use. CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum contraceptive intentions do not differ significantly between women intending to breastfeed and those intending formula feeding. Contraception attitudes do not significantly change this association, but were significantly related to contraceptive intent. Findings highlight the importance of providing comprehensive birth control education to all expectant mothers, regardless of feeding intention. Our study is unique in addressing interactions between maternal contraceptive and feeding intentions among expectant women at high risk for both not breastfeeding and unintended short interval pregnancy.

The Effect of Breast Pump Use on Exclusive Breastfeeding at 2 Months Postpartum in an Inner-City Population.

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is the optimal form of infant nutrition, yet national rates are below recommendations with persistent disparities. Breast pumps may address the reasons that mothers discontinue breastfeeding. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether breast pump use increases exclusive breastfeeding at 1.5-3.5 months postpartum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed charts for maternal-infant descriptors and feeding type for infants born between November 2013 and June 2014 who received any breast milk at a visit <14 days of age in our inner-city pediatric practice. We compared feeding at 1.5-3.5 months between those with breast pump and those without breast pump. RESULTS: Of the 905 infants with feeding type recorded, 487 (54%) received any breast milk, of whom 355 (72.9%) had a visit at 1.5-3.5 months [95.4% African American (AA)]. Rates of any breastfeeding (93.8% vs. 38.9%) and exclusive breastfeeding (50.0% vs. 17.8%) were significantly higher in non-AAs than in AAs. Due to small numbers of non-AAs, further analyses were conducted for AAs only. The rate of exclusive breastfeeding at 1.5-3.5 months (19.4% vs. 16.3%) was similar between those with a breast pump and those without a breast pump, whereas rates of any breastfeeding were higher among those with no breast pump (46.9% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.004). Also, among AA mothers, rates of feeding at the breast were lower (21.5% vs. 44.4%, p < 0.0001) and rates of feeding expressed breast milk were higher (16.6% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.02) among those with a breast pump versus those without a breast pump. CONCLUSIONS: Although breast pumps were free, breast pump use among predominantly AA WIC-eligible mothers was not associated with increased rates of exclusive breastfeeding at 1.5-3.5 months postpartum.