ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography has been reported as an effective alternative to invasive conventional coronary angiography (CCA) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, in previous reports, the diagnostic accuracy of MSCT has not been significant enough to be of benefit in symptomatic patients. The aim of this study was to identify the usefulness of 320-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (320-CTA) for symptomatic patients in terms of the diagnostic accuracy of 320-CTA and the prevalence of vasospastic angina pectoris (VSAP) within the study cohort. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 513 consecutive symptomatic patients with suspected CAD who had undergone 320-CTA and CCA. We determined the diagnostic accuracy of 320-CTA using CCA as the reference standard. Ergonovine provocation tests were performed on patients without significant coronary artery stenosis on CCA. RESULTS: Of the total cohort of 513 symptomatic patients, 39% had obstructive CAD. The patient based analysis of the accuracy of 320-CTA showed a sensitivity of 91.0%, a specificity of 71.0%, a positive predictive value of 66.5%, and a negative predictive value of 92.5%. Of the 314 symptomatic patients who did not have significant coronary artery stenosis on CCA, 58 (18%) were diagnosed with VSAP using ergonovine provocation tests. DISCUSSION: The negative and positive predictive values indicate that 320-CTA cannot replace CCA for symptomatic patients. Indeed, a combination of CCA and ergonovine provocation tests should be taken into consideration for symptomatic patients.
