ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: The transtheoretical model (TTM) is a promising approach to the promotion of behavior change, but it remains to be established whether there is an association between the TTM approach and intradialytic exercise among patients on hemodialysis (HD) with low motivation to exercise in a real-world setting.This retrospective cohort study, conducted in a regional hospital in Japan, included adult outpatients receiving HD 3 times per week who had never participated in intradialytic pedaling exercise despite the encouragement of the HD personnel. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to HD weekday. Patients undergoing HD on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday were encouraged by the HD unit team to exercise during HD based on the TTM (exposure group) and those receiving HD on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday were encouraged to exercise as usual (control group). The primary outcome was sustained intradialytic exercise using a leg ergometer, defined as a total of 72 sessions of 30-minute pedaling exercise (duration of at least 6âmonths).Overall, 85 patients were included in the analysis (mean age: 67.1â±â11.9âyears, 22% female). Of 33 patients in the exposure group, 10 (30%) maintained intradialytic exercise, compared with 2 of 52 patients (4%) in the control group. Log-binomial regression models with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting showed a significant association between the TTM approach and sustained intradialytic exercise (adjusted risk ratio 9.23 [95% confidence interval 2.13-40.00]). There were no exercise-related cardiovascular events.Among patients with low motivation to exercise during HD, use of the TTM approach in clinical practice was associated with sustained intradialytic exercise compared with usual care.
Subject(s)
Bicycling/physiology , Counseling/methods , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Renal Dialysis/methods , Transtheoretical Model , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bicycling/psychology , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Healthy Lifestyle , Humans , Japan , Kidney Failure, Chronic/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Motivation , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the outcome of living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) performed in low-volume centers lacking the services of full-time transplant surgeons. This retrospective cohort study assessed the outcome of LDKT performed in a low-volume center by visiting transplant surgeons from a high-volume center and managed perioperatively by transplant nephrologists. METHODS: We compared Japanese adult patients who had no donor-specific antibodies and underwent LDKT between 2006 and 2015 either in a low-volume (n = 31) or high-volume (n = 481) center. In the low-volume center, visiting transplant surgeons from the high-volume center conducted LDKT and transplant nephrologists managed the recipients peri- and postoperatively. The primary outcome was the composite of infection, cardiovascular disease, or cancer during 1-year follow-up. The outcomes of the low- and high-volume centers were compared using 1:2 propensity score matching. RESULTS: After matching, 9 of 29 patients in the low-volume center (31.0%) and 16 of 58 patients in the high-volume center (27.6%) experienced the primary composite outcome (risk ratio = 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-2.23). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in graft function at 1 year, all-cause graft loss, biopsy-proven rejection, and urological complications. However, the median duration of post-LDKT hospitalization was significantly longer in the low-volume center than in the high-volume center (23 and 16 days, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among Japanese patients without preformed donor-specific antibodies, LDKT conducted at a low-volume center by visiting transplant surgeons from a high-volume center and managed clinically by transplant nephrologists was not associated with significantly higher risk of postoperative complications.
Subject(s)
Hospitals, High-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Low-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Nephrologists/statistics & numerical data , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Antibodies/analysis , Female , Graft Survival , Humans , Japan , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Living Donors , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications/immunology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
In patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC), adsorptive granulocyte/monocyte apheresis (GMA) is expected to promote remission. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GMA in patients with active UC. Twenty-one UC patients including five pregnant or lactating mothers and four elderly patients (aged >60 years) received up to 10 GMA sessions. UC severity was evaluated at baseline and after GMA therapy according to Lichtiger's Clinical Activity Index (CAI). We defined clinical remission as CAI ≤4. Overall, the median CAI score after GMA therapy had decreased from 9 to 4 (P < 0.001). The clinical remission rate was 62%, but in the elderly and pregnant or lactating mothers, the remission rates were 100% and 60%, respectively. No severe adverse effects were seen in this study. Our results may support GMA as an effective and safe treatment for active UC patients, including elderly patients and pregnant cases.
