Radiation therapy versus surgery for patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy revisited.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic significance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radiation therapy (RT) was negated during the early 1990s. Here, we compared post-NAC RT to surgery for chemo-sensitive cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). METHODS: This study included 79 consecutive patients with cervical SCC who were treated by NAC followed by surgery (n = 49) or by definitive RT (n = 30). We compared characteristics and survival outcomes between the surgery and RT groups by their responses to NAC. RESULTS: Of the 79 patients, 70 (89%) had stage II-IV disease and 41 (52%) had radiological pelvic lymph node enlargement. The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate of the entire cohort was 66.4% (median follow-up 54 months). Fifty-five patients (70%) achieved sufficient (complete or partial) responses to NAC. Among patients with insufficient NAC responses, the 5-year DSS rate of the surgery group (55.6%) was significantly higher than the RT group (20.0%; P = 0.044). However, among patients with sufficient responses to NAC, 5-year DSS rates did not significantly differ between the surgery and RT groups (82.3 vs 78.6%; P = 0.79) even though the RT group had many more unfavorable prognostic factors and received fewer subsequent treatments than the surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: Post-NAC survival outcomes among patients with chemo-sensitive cervical SCC who then underwent RT were not inferior to those treated with surgery, and NAC did not detract from the efficacy of subsequent RT. Among selected patients who respond favorably to NAC, RT could be a less invasive substitute for surgery without compromising treatment outcomes.

Prognostic factors for patients with brain metastasis from gynecological cancer: a significance of treatment-free interval of more than 6 months.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment-free interval has been confirmed as a significant prognostic factor in recurrent gynecological cancers. However, treatment-free interval has not been evaluated in previous studies investigating brain metastasis from gynecological malignancies. The aim of the study was to establish a predictive model of survival period after brain metastasis from gynecological cancer. METHODS: Of a total of 2848 patients with gynecological cancer, patients with brain metastasis were included in the study. Data at the time of brain metastasis diagnosis, which included primary origin, presence of extracranial metastasis, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, the number of brain metastases, brain-metastasis free-interval, treatment-free interval and treatment for brain metastasis were collected. Survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Incidences of brain metastasis were 1.7% (47/2848). Median survival period after diagnosis of brain metastasis was 20 weeks (4-5 months). The 6-, 12- and 24-month survival rates after brain metastasis were 44.0%, 22.0% and 16.5%, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed that extracranial metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 5.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-26.3), ECOG performance status of 3-4 (HR, 3.1; 95% CI: 1.20-7.91), treatment-free interval of <6 months (HR, 3.8; 95% CI: 1.09-13.1), and no anti-cancer treatment for brain metastasis (HR, 3.6; 95% CI: 1.34-9.41) were significantly and independently related to poor survival. CONCLUSION: Treatment-free interval should be assessed in a future study to verify prognostic predictors of brain metastasis from gynecological cancer.