Worldwide meta-analysis of the prevalence of Campylobacter in animal food products.

The objective of this meta-analysis was to summarize available information on the prevalence of thermotolerant Campylobacter in different animal food products. A number of multilevel random-effect meta-analysis models were fitted to estimate mean prevalence of thermotolerant Campylobacter and to compare them among animal food products (cattle, pigs, broiler, hen, goat, sheep). The mean prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in animal food products was 29.6% (95% CI 27.6%-31%), and the mean prevalence of C. jejuni and C. coli were 19.3% and 9.7%, respectively. The prevalence of Campylobacter spp. was higher in products whose sources were broiler meat (p-estimate = 47.8%; 95% CI 44.9%-50.6%). C. jejuni was mainly observed in broiler meat where prevalence estimate (p-estimate) was 33.7% (95% CI 30.7%-36.8%). On the other hand, C. coli was observed in broiler meat (p-estimate = 14.1%; 95% CI 12.3%-16.1%) and sheep meat (p-estimate = 11.0%; 95% CI 3.6%-29.1%). The animal food products with the lowest prevalence of Campylobacter spp. were milk and dairy products (p-estimate = 3.5%; 95% CI 1.8%-6.5%), eggs (p-estimate = 4.0%; 95% CI 1.4%-10.7%), sausage (p-estimate = 9.4%; 95% CI 3.3%-24.0%), This meta-analysis concluding that C. jejuni is the most prevalent species worldwide and broiler meat is the main contamination source for human. The prevalence of Campylobacter species has public health importance and national authorities must monitor the situation in each country with the aim to establish the appropriate risk management measures.

Impact of lyophilized Lactobacillus salivarius DSPV 001P administration on growth performance, microbial translocation, and gastrointestinal microbiota of broilers reared under low ambient temperature.

This study was undertaken with the aim of investigating the effects of dietary supplementation of probiotic strain Lactobacillus salivarius DSPV 001P on growth performance, microbial translocation, and gastrointestinal microbiota of broilers reared under low ambient temperature. Two hundred and forty, one-day-old male Cobb broilers were randomly distributed into two treatment groups, a probiotic group and a control group, with four replicates per treatment and 30 broilers per replicate. The temperature of the broiler house was maintained at 18-22°C during the first three weeks, after which the temperature was at range of 8°C to 12°C. The results showed that probiotic treatment significantly improved body weight of broilers when compared with the control group. After 42days, the weight means were 2905±365.4g and 2724±427.0g, respectively. Although there were no significant differences, dietary inclusion of L. salivarius tended to increase feed intake and to reduce feed conversion ratio during the six-week experimental period. Similarly, supplementation tended to reduce the rate of mortality, with 12 deaths occurring in the probiotic group, and 20 in the control group. However, no differences were observed in intestinal bacterial concentrations of Enterobacteriaceae, E.coli, and lactic acid bacteria in both crop and caecum among treatments. Through our study, it appears that L. salivarius DSPV 001P was non-pathogenic, safe and beneficial to broilers, which implies that it could be a promising feed additive, thus enhancing the growth performance of broilers and improving their health.

Probiotics and broiler growth performance: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

1. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of probiotics on the growth performance of broilers. PubMed, Scopus and Scholar Google databases were searched in all languages from 1980 to 2012. The studies in the meta-analysis were only selected if they were randomised and controlled experiments using broilers without apparent disease and the results were published in peer-reviewed journals. 2. A total of 48 and 46 studies were included to assess probiotic effects on body weight gain (BWG) and feed efficiency (FE), respectively. Probiotics increased BWG compared to controls (SMD = 0.661, 95% CI 0.499 to 0.822) and improved FE (SMD = - 0.281, 95% CI -0.404 to -0.157) in the pooled standardised mean difference random effect model, considering the source of heterogeneity and publication biases. However, there are evidences of publication bias and heterogeneity, so the results of this meta-analysis should be considered with caution. Applying the Duval and Tweedie's trim-and-fill methods, the adjusted value for BWG was 0.0594 (95% CI -0.122 to 0.242), and the adjusted value for FE did not show any modifications. 3. The meta-analysis showed that application of probiotics via water resulted in greater BGW and FE than administration through the feed. The effect was not related to the use of mono-strain or multi-strain probiotics, although it may depend on the strain used. The number of broilers and the duration of the experiments had an impact on the outcomes. 4. Additional studies should be conducted with the aim to identify the covariates which can explain the differences in the estimated effect sizes.