Clinical Obesity Services in Public Hospitals in Australia: a position statement based on expert consensus.

We aimed to describe the current state of specialist obesity services for adults with clinically severe obesity in public hospitals in Australia, and to analyse the gap in resources based on expert consensus. We conducted two surveys to collect information about current and required specialist obesity services and resources using open-ended questionnaires. Organizational level data were sought from clinician expert representatives of specialist obesity services across Australia in 2017. Fifteen of 16 representatives of current services in New South Wales (n = 8), Queensland (n = 1), Victoria (n = 2), South Australia (n = 3), and the Australian Capital Territory (n = 1) provided data. The composition of services varied substantially between hospitals, and patient access to services and effective treatments were limited by strict entry criteria (e.g. body mass index 40 kg/m2 or higher with specific complication/s), prolonged wait times, geographical location (major cities only) and out-of-pocket costs. Of these services, 47% had a multidisciplinary team (MDT), 53% had an exercise physiologist/physiotherapist, 53% had a bariatric surgeon and 33% had pharmacotherapy resources. Key gaps included staffing components of the MDT (psychologist, exercise physiologist/physiotherapist) and access to publicly funded weight loss pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery. There was consensus on the need for significant improvements in staff, physical infrastructure, access to services, education/training in obesity medicine and targeted research funding. Based on the small number of existing, often under-resourced specialist obesity services that are located only in a few major cities, the vast majority of Australians with clinically severe obesity cannot access the specialist evidence based treatments needed.

The value of local registry data for describing cervical cancer management and outcomes over three decades in Australia.

Registry data on invasive cervical cancers (n = 1,274) from four major hospitals (1984-2012) were analysed to determine their value for informing local service delivery in Australia. The methodology comprised disease-specific survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates and Cox proportional hazards models and treatment analyses using logistic regression. Five- and 10-year survivals were 72% and 68%, respectively, equating with relative survival estimates for Australia and the USA. Most common treatments were surgery and radiotherapy. Systemic therapies increased in recent years, generally with radiotherapy, but were less common for residents from less accessible areas. Surgery was more common for younger women and early-stage disease, and radiotherapy for older women and regional and more advanced disease. The proportion of glandular cancers increased in-step with national trends. Little evidence of variation in risk-adjusted survival presented over time or by Local Health District. The study illustrates the value of local registry data for describing local treatment and outcomes. They show the lower use of systemic therapies among residents of less accessible areas which warrants further investigation. Risk-adjusted treatment and outcomes did not vary by socio-economic status, suggesting equity in service delivery. These data are important for local evaluation and were not available from other sources.

Clinical outcomes for the obese hospital inpatient: An observational study.

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of obesity presents a burden for Australian health care. The aim of this study was to determine whether severely obese hospital inpatients have worse outcomes. METHODS: This is an observational cohort study, using data from all adult patients admitted to hospital for all elective and emergency admissions of patients aged over 18 years to two large Australian urban hospitals. We measured their length of stay, intensive care unit admission rate, intensive care unit length of stay, mortality and readmission rates within 28 days of discharge and compared these outcomes in the severely obese and non-severely obese subjects using t-test or chi-square test as appropriate. RESULTS: Between February 2008 and February 2012, 120,872 were admitted to hospital 193,800 times; 2701 patients were identified as severely obese (2.23%) and 118,171 patients were non-severely obese. If admitted as an emergency, severely obese patients have worse outcomes and consume more resources than other patients. These outcomes are still worse, but less so, if the obese patient is admitted as an elective patient suggesting that anticipation of any obesity-specific problems can have a beneficial effect. CONCLUSION: Upon admission or discharge of severely obese hospital inpatients, health care plans should be even more carefully laid than usual to reduce the risk of readmission.

Assessing impact of organised breast screening across small residential areas-development and internal validation of a prediction model.

Monitoring screening mammography effects in small areas is often limited by small numbers of deaths and delayed effects. We developed a risk score for breast cancer death to circumvent these limitations. Screening, if effective, would increase post-diagnostic survivals through lead-time and related effects, as well as mortality reductions. Linked cancer and BreastScreen data at four hospitals (n = 2,039) were used to investigate whether screened cases had higher recorded survivals in 13 small areas, using breast cancer deaths as the outcome (M1), and a risk of death score derived from TNM stage, grade, histology type, hormone receptor status, and related variables (M2). M1 indicated lower risk of death in screened cases in 12 of the 13 areas, achieving statistical significance (p < .05) in 5. M2 indicated lower risk scores in screened cases in all 13 areas, achieving statistical significance in 12. For cases recently screened at diagnosis (<6 months), statistically significant reductions applied in 8 areas (M1) and all 13 areas (M2). Screening effects are more detectable in small areas using these risk scores than death itself as the outcome variable. An added advantage is the application of risk scores for providing a marker of screening effect soon after diagnosis.

Colorectal cancer treatment and survival over three decades at four major public hospitals in South Australia: trends by age and in the elderly.

Data from registries at four major public hospitals in South Australia indicate increased 5-year disease-specific survivals for colorectal cancer from 48% to 63% between 1980-1986 and 2005-2010. For 80+ year olds, the increase was smaller, from 47% to 52%. Risk of case fatality halved overall, adjusting for age, gender, stage, differentiation and sub-site. Patients aged 80+ years had a lower risk reduction of about a third (hazards ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence limits, 0.52-0.92). Percentages having surgery and other specified treatments were lower for 80+ year olds than younger cases, although increases in treatment intensity occurred in this age range during 1980-2010, as seen in younger ages, in accordance with guidelines. The study illustrates the important feedback clinical registries can provide to clinicians on care patterns and outcomes in their hospital settings. Feedback can be the subject of local deliberations on how to achieve the best outcomes, including in the elderly by considering the best trade-offs between optimal cancer care and accommodations for co-morbidity and frailty. Clinical registry data can be used in comparative effectiveness research in local settings where there are sufficient case numbers.