ABSTRACT
Background: Cranioplasty (CP) of autologous bone flap after decompressive craniectomy (DC) is known to be associated with a high complication rate, particularly bone flap resorption (BFR). In a retrospective study, we used a novel virtual reality (VR) visualisation technique to identify and evaluate risk factors associated with CP.Method: Twenty-five patients underwent early autologous CP. All complications were recorded. Cranial computed tomography scans were visualised via the VR software to access the fitting accuracy of the bone flap (bone flap size, gap width at trepanation cutting edge, extent of osteoclastic extension).Results: An overall complication rate of 44% was seen, and BFR was the most common (36%). Only 'osteoclastic extension of trepanation' (p = .04) was a significant risk factor for BFR. The factors 'indication for DC' (p = .09) and 'size of bone flap' (p = .09) had a tendency towards influencing the rate of BFR, while 'age' (p = .68), 'time interval between DC and CP' (p = 1.00), and 'gap width' (p = .50) were not considered to influence the BFR rate.Conclusions: DC and subsequent CP is a complication-prone procedure. Therefore, it is relevant to identify and quantify probable risk factors for the most common complications, such as BFR. Here, we found that the extent of osteoclastic extension may impair the patient's healing process. Our investigation was made considerably easier by using the novel VR visualisation technique, which allows parallax free measurements of distances in 3D space.
Subject(s)
Decompressive Craniectomy/methods , Virtual Reality , Adult , Aged , Decompressive Craniectomy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surgical Flaps , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , TrephiningABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Foraminal cervical nerve root compression can be caused by lateral disk herniation or osteophyte formation of the vertebrae. Improved diagnosis and evaluation can be achieved using different imaging techniques: radiographs, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging. We retrospectively evaluated the potential influence of a virtual reality (VR) visualization technique on surgery planning and evaluation of postoperative results in patients with monosegmental, unilateral osseous cervical neuroforaminal stenosis. METHODS: Seventy-three patients were included. Ventral decompression of the neuroforamen was performed in 41 patients, dorsal decompression in 32 patients. Patients' files were evaluated. CT scans were visualized via VR software to measure the smallest cross-sectional area of the intervertebral neuroforamen in the lateral resection region. A questionnaire evaluated the influence of VR technique on surgical planning and strategy. RESULTS: The VR-technique had a moderate influence on the choice of the approach (ventral or dorsal), a significant influence on the ventral approach strategy, and no influence on the positioning of the patient or the dorsal approach strategy. A significant difference was found in the size of the smallest cross-sectional area of the intervertebral neuroforamen in the lateral resection region between ventral and dorsal approaches, with no correlation to the clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of pre- and postoperative 2D-CT images of the cervical spine into 3D images, and the spatial and anatomical reconstructions in VR models, can be helpful in planning surgical approaches and treatment strategies for patients with cervical foraminal stenoses, and for evaluation of their postoperative results.
